The roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort

IF 5.9 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
{"title":"The roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jtos.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To investigate the roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort (CLD).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Cooling stimuli (20 °C) were applied to the cornea in a group comprising 24 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers as well as 15 non-CL wearing controls, using a computerized Belmonte esthesiometer. The adaptation paradigm consisted of 20 repetitive stimuli at threshold, sub- and supra-threshold levels. The sensitization paradigm involved five levels of suprathreshold stimuli ranging between 1x to 2x threshold. Following each stimulus, participants rated the sensation magnitude regarding intensity, coolness and irritation. Measurements were taken with habitual CL (BL_CL), after 2 weeks of no-CL (No_CL) and after restarting habitual CL wear (ReSt_CL).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The symptomatic subjects exhibited a lower threshold but reported enhanced sensations during the adaptation and sensitization paradigm, compared to the asymptomatic and control groups (all p ≤ 0.021). At the BL_CL and ReSt_CL visits, they showed increased ratings to repeated subthreshold stimuli (p = 0.025) and greater irritation during the sensitization paradigm (p ≤ 0.032). Ratings in asymptomatic and control groups were relatively unchanged over time (p ≥ 0.181). Logistic regression revealed a link between the augmented sensory responses and increased likelihood with CLD.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The maladaptive sensory responses seen in CLD subjects, with reduced adaptation and heightened sensitization to ocular surface stimulation, suggest an imbalance between sensitization and adaptation in CLD. As CLD may represent a reversible subcategory of dry eye, it can serve as a human dry eye model for studying the neurosensory effect of ocular surface stimulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54691,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Surface","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542012424000727/pdfft?md5=6bb2ef1d0f29a2084e73134238b3ae37&pid=1-s2.0-S1542012424000727-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Surface","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542012424000727","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the roles of neural adaptation and sensitization in contact lens discomfort (CLD).

Methods

Cooling stimuli (20 °C) were applied to the cornea in a group comprising 24 symptomatic and 25 asymptomatic contact lens (CL) wearers as well as 15 non-CL wearing controls, using a computerized Belmonte esthesiometer. The adaptation paradigm consisted of 20 repetitive stimuli at threshold, sub- and supra-threshold levels. The sensitization paradigm involved five levels of suprathreshold stimuli ranging between 1x to 2x threshold. Following each stimulus, participants rated the sensation magnitude regarding intensity, coolness and irritation. Measurements were taken with habitual CL (BL_CL), after 2 weeks of no-CL (No_CL) and after restarting habitual CL wear (ReSt_CL).

Results

The symptomatic subjects exhibited a lower threshold but reported enhanced sensations during the adaptation and sensitization paradigm, compared to the asymptomatic and control groups (all p ≤ 0.021). At the BL_CL and ReSt_CL visits, they showed increased ratings to repeated subthreshold stimuli (p = 0.025) and greater irritation during the sensitization paradigm (p ≤ 0.032). Ratings in asymptomatic and control groups were relatively unchanged over time (p ≥ 0.181). Logistic regression revealed a link between the augmented sensory responses and increased likelihood with CLD.

Conclusion

The maladaptive sensory responses seen in CLD subjects, with reduced adaptation and heightened sensitization to ocular surface stimulation, suggest an imbalance between sensitization and adaptation in CLD. As CLD may represent a reversible subcategory of dry eye, it can serve as a human dry eye model for studying the neurosensory effect of ocular surface stimulation.

隐形眼镜不适感的神经适应和敏化作用。
目的:研究神经适应和敏感化在隐形眼镜不适(CLD)中的作用 方法:使用计算机化的贝尔蒙特角膜震颤仪,对一组 24 名有症状和 25 名无症状的隐形眼镜佩戴者以及 15 名未佩戴隐形眼镜的对照者的角膜施加冷却刺激(20°C)。适应范式包括 20 个阈值、阈下和阈上水平的重复刺激。敏化范式包括五个级别的阈上刺激,从 1 倍到 2 倍阈值不等。每次刺激后,参与者都要对感觉的强度、凉爽度和刺激性进行评分。测量分别在佩戴习惯性耳环(BL_CL)、不佩戴耳环(No_CL)2 周后和重新佩戴习惯性耳环(ReSt_CL)后进行:结果:与无症状组和对照组相比,有症状的受试者阈值较低,但在适应和敏化范式中感觉增强(均 p≤ 0.021)。在BL_CL和ReSt_CL检查中,他们对重复阈值下刺激的评分增加(p= 0.025),在过敏范式中的刺激感增强(p≤ 0.032)。无症状组和对照组的评分随着时间的推移相对不变(p≥ 0.181)。逻辑回归显示,感觉反应增强与CLD可能性增加之间存在联系:结论:CLD 受试者出现适应不良的感觉反应,对眼表刺激的适应性降低而敏感性增强,这表明在 CLD 中敏感性和适应性之间存在失衡。CLD可能是干眼症的一个可逆的亚类,因此可作为研究眼表刺激神经感觉效应的人类干眼症模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ocular Surface
Ocular Surface 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
14.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Ocular Surface, a quarterly, a peer-reviewed journal, is an authoritative resource that integrates and interprets major findings in diverse fields related to the ocular surface, including ophthalmology, optometry, genetics, molecular biology, pharmacology, immunology, infectious disease, and epidemiology. Its critical review articles cover the most current knowledge on medical and surgical management of ocular surface pathology, new understandings of ocular surface physiology, the meaning of recent discoveries on how the ocular surface responds to injury and disease, and updates on drug and device development. The journal also publishes select original research reports and articles describing cutting-edge techniques and technology in the field. Benefits to authors We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services. Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信