Mônica do Amaral Silva, Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas, Guilherme Antônio Lopes de Oliveira, Edilson Martins Rodrigues Neto, Emmanuel Arraes de Alencar Júnior, Patricia Leal Dantas Lobo, Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho Dantas, Mary Anne Medeiros Bandeira, Marta Maria de França Fonteles, Gandhi Radis Baptista
{"title":"Biomarkers of Orthodontic Patients After Use of 1% Brazilian Red Propolis Toothpaste: A Randomized Clinical Study.","authors":"Mônica do Amaral Silva, Lídia Audrey Rocha Valadas, Guilherme Antônio Lopes de Oliveira, Edilson Martins Rodrigues Neto, Emmanuel Arraes de Alencar Júnior, Patricia Leal Dantas Lobo, Thereza Cristina Farias Botelho Dantas, Mary Anne Medeiros Bandeira, Marta Maria de França Fonteles, Gandhi Radis Baptista","doi":"10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_120_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the salivary biomarkers and plaque index after a treatment with a propolis-contained toothpaste.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a longitudinal, randomized, double-blind study where 76 participants were randomized into two groups: Group I: Fluoridated Red Propolis toothpaste; Group II: Fluoridated toothpaste. The participants were selected in a municipality without fluoridated public water. All participants received standardized oral hygiene instructions from the same instructor for 3 daily brushings (after breakfast, after lunch, and before bed) for a period of 2 min; Saliva samples were collected before (D0) and after 28 days (D28) of treatment for analysis of pH and total protein, amylase, and IL-10. Saliva was collected in the initial consultation and on return, totaling two collections. All samples were collected under the same conditions, by the same operator and between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM in order to minimize the influence of circadian rhythm on salivary flow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On D0 and D28, the various treatments had no effect on total salivary proteins (G1: <i>P</i> = 0.0746; G2: <i>P</i> = 0.2144), and the pH stayed about the same. Additionally, there was no change in the amylase activity in G1 (<i>P</i> = 0.1877) or G2 (<i>P</i> = 0.4674). Significant decreases in G1 (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) and G2 (<i>P</i> = 0.03) were observed with IL-10. There was no statistically significant difference in the salivary flow between the BRP toothpaste-treated group (<i>P</i> = 0.172) and the commercial fluoridated toothpaste-treated group (<i>P</i> = 0.329). Compared to G2 (<i>P</i> = 0.03), G1 showed a superior decline in the plaque index (<i>P</i> = <0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After 28 days of using the toothpastes, there were no changes in the amylase, pH, or total protein indicators. After 28 days, there was a decrease in the propolis group's IL-10 dose and plaque index.</p>","PeriodicalId":47247,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","volume":"14 3","pages":"218-224"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268535/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jispcd.jispcd_120_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the salivary biomarkers and plaque index after a treatment with a propolis-contained toothpaste.
Materials and methods: This is a longitudinal, randomized, double-blind study where 76 participants were randomized into two groups: Group I: Fluoridated Red Propolis toothpaste; Group II: Fluoridated toothpaste. The participants were selected in a municipality without fluoridated public water. All participants received standardized oral hygiene instructions from the same instructor for 3 daily brushings (after breakfast, after lunch, and before bed) for a period of 2 min; Saliva samples were collected before (D0) and after 28 days (D28) of treatment for analysis of pH and total protein, amylase, and IL-10. Saliva was collected in the initial consultation and on return, totaling two collections. All samples were collected under the same conditions, by the same operator and between 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM in order to minimize the influence of circadian rhythm on salivary flow.
Results: On D0 and D28, the various treatments had no effect on total salivary proteins (G1: P = 0.0746; G2: P = 0.2144), and the pH stayed about the same. Additionally, there was no change in the amylase activity in G1 (P = 0.1877) or G2 (P = 0.4674). Significant decreases in G1 (P < 0.0001) and G2 (P = 0.03) were observed with IL-10. There was no statistically significant difference in the salivary flow between the BRP toothpaste-treated group (P = 0.172) and the commercial fluoridated toothpaste-treated group (P = 0.329). Compared to G2 (P = 0.03), G1 showed a superior decline in the plaque index (P = <0.0001).
Conclusions: After 28 days of using the toothpastes, there were no changes in the amylase, pH, or total protein indicators. After 28 days, there was a decrease in the propolis group's IL-10 dose and plaque index.
期刊介绍:
It is a journal aimed for research, scientific facts and details covering all specialties of dentistry with a good determination for exploring and sharing the knowledge in the medical and dental fraternity. The scope is therefore huge covering almost all streams of dentistry - starting from original studies, systematic reviews, narrative reviews, very unique case reports. Journal scope is not limited to these subjects and is more wider covering all specialities of dentistry follows: -Preventive and Community dentistry (Dental public health)- Endodontics- Oral and maxillofacial pathology- Oral and maxillofacial radiology- Oral and maxillofacial surgery (also called oral surgery)- Orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics- Periodontology (also called periodontics)- Pediatric dentistry (also called pedodontics)- Prosthodontics (also called prosthetic dentistry)- Oral medicine- Special needs dentistry (also called special care dentistry)- Oral Biology- Forensic odontology- Geriatric dentistry or Geriodontics- Preventive and Social Medicine (Public health)- Our journal appreciates research articles pertaining with advancement of dentistry, preventive and community dentistry including oral epidemiology, oral health services research, oral health education and promotion, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, dental jurisprudence, ethics and oral health, economics, and quality assessment, recent advances in preventive dentistry and community dentistry.