Cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus autogenic muscle energy technique for chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 Q2 REHABILITATION
Hoda I Abbas, Ragia M Kamel, Ayman E Shafei, Mayada A Mahmoud, Yasser R Lasheen
{"title":"Cervicothoracic junction mobilization versus autogenic muscle energy technique for chronic mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Hoda I Abbas, Ragia M Kamel, Ayman E Shafei, Mayada A Mahmoud, Yasser R Lasheen","doi":"10.1080/10669817.2024.2384199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Neck pain is a prevalent global health concern often accompanied by musculoskeletal symptoms. This randomized controlled trial attempted to contrast the impacts of non-thrust Maitland mobilization and Autogenic inhibition muscle energy technique on chronic mechanical neck pain associated with cervico-thoracic junction hypo-mobility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty participants (24 males and 36 females, aged 18-45 years) were allocated randomly into three equally sized groups (A, B, C). Group A: Maitland mobilization plus conventional treatment, Group B: Autogenic Muscle energy technique plus conventional treatment, while; Group C solely received conventional treatment. Treatment was administered for four weeks, three times a week. Outcome measures: neck pain (The primary outcome measure) assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), disability evaluated through Neck Disability Index (NDI), active range of motion (AROM), and joint position error (JPE) as an indicator of cervical proprioception. All measures were assessed both at baseline and after four weeks of intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed significant improvements in VAS, NDI, and increased ROM across all groups post-treatment (<i>p</i> < 0.001). While Groups A and B demonstrated superior outcomes compared to Group C, differences between Groups A and B were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> > 0.05). For VAS and NDI, Cohen-d between Groups A and B was 0.31 and 0.31, and for ROM, Cohen-d was 0.37, 0.16, 0.07, 0.29, 0.36, and 0.53 for flexion, extension, right rotation, left rotation, right bending, and left bending, respectively. Furthermore, all groups experienced a significant decrease in JPE, with Groups A and B showing greater improvement than Group C (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Group B exhibited significantly greater improvement in reducing JPE related to specific motions compared to Group A (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervico-thoracic junction mobilization and the Autogenic muscle energy technique offer enhanced management for mechanical neck pain by improving pain, function, ROM, and cervical proprioception.</p>","PeriodicalId":47319,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10669817.2024.2384199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Neck pain is a prevalent global health concern often accompanied by musculoskeletal symptoms. This randomized controlled trial attempted to contrast the impacts of non-thrust Maitland mobilization and Autogenic inhibition muscle energy technique on chronic mechanical neck pain associated with cervico-thoracic junction hypo-mobility.

Methods: Sixty participants (24 males and 36 females, aged 18-45 years) were allocated randomly into three equally sized groups (A, B, C). Group A: Maitland mobilization plus conventional treatment, Group B: Autogenic Muscle energy technique plus conventional treatment, while; Group C solely received conventional treatment. Treatment was administered for four weeks, three times a week. Outcome measures: neck pain (The primary outcome measure) assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), disability evaluated through Neck Disability Index (NDI), active range of motion (AROM), and joint position error (JPE) as an indicator of cervical proprioception. All measures were assessed both at baseline and after four weeks of intervention.

Results: Results showed significant improvements in VAS, NDI, and increased ROM across all groups post-treatment (p < 0.001). While Groups A and B demonstrated superior outcomes compared to Group C, differences between Groups A and B were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). For VAS and NDI, Cohen-d between Groups A and B was 0.31 and 0.31, and for ROM, Cohen-d was 0.37, 0.16, 0.07, 0.29, 0.36, and 0.53 for flexion, extension, right rotation, left rotation, right bending, and left bending, respectively. Furthermore, all groups experienced a significant decrease in JPE, with Groups A and B showing greater improvement than Group C (p < 0.01). Group B exhibited significantly greater improvement in reducing JPE related to specific motions compared to Group A (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Cervico-thoracic junction mobilization and the Autogenic muscle energy technique offer enhanced management for mechanical neck pain by improving pain, function, ROM, and cervical proprioception.

颈胸交界处动员术与自发肌肉能量技术治疗慢性机械性颈痛:随机对照试验。
目的:颈痛是全球普遍关注的健康问题,通常伴有肌肉骨骼症状。这项随机对照试验试图对比无推力麦特兰运动疗法和自发抑制肌肉能量技术对与颈胸交界处低运动性相关的慢性机械性颈痛的影响:将 60 名参与者(24 名男性和 36 名女性,年龄在 18-45 岁之间)随机分配到三个人数相等的小组(A、B、C)。A组B 组:自生肌肉能量技术加常规治疗,C 组仅接受常规治疗。治疗为期四周,每周三次。结果测量:颈部疼痛(主要结果测量)由视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估,残疾由颈部残疾指数(NDI)评估,主动运动范围(AROM)和关节位置误差(JPE)作为颈椎本体感觉的指标。所有指标均在基线和四周干预后进行评估:结果显示,治疗后各组的 VAS、NDI 和 ROM 均有明显改善(P P > 0.05)。对于 VAS 和 NDI,A 组和 B 组之间的 Cohen-d 值分别为 0.31 和 0.31,而对于 ROM,Cohen-d 值分别为 0.37、0.16、0.07、0.29、0.36 和 0.53,包括屈曲、伸展、右旋、左旋、右弯和左弯。此外,所有组的 JPE 都有显著下降,A 组和 B 组比 C 组有更大的改善(p p 结论):颈胸交界处动员和自发肌肉能量技术可改善疼痛、功能、活动度和颈椎本体感觉,从而加强对机械性颈痛的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: The Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the publication of original research, case reports, and reviews of the literature that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field of manual therapy, clinical research, therapeutic practice, and academic training. In addition, each issue features an editorial written by the editor or a guest editor, media reviews, thesis reviews, and abstracts of current literature. Areas of interest include: •Thrust and non-thrust manipulation •Neurodynamic assessment and treatment •Diagnostic accuracy and classification •Manual therapy-related interventions •Clinical decision-making processes •Understanding clinimetrics for the clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信