Control of cardiometabolic risk factors and their association with carotid intima media thickness among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-single center experience in a developing country.
{"title":"Control of cardiometabolic risk factors and their association with carotid intima media thickness among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus-single center experience in a developing country.","authors":"Thilak Priyantha Weerarathna, Sarath Lekamwasam, Iroshani Kodikara, Keddegoda Gamage Piyumi Wasana, Lakmal Fonseka","doi":"10.55730/1300-0144.5821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is closely associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). The objective of this study was to describe the degree of ASCVD risk factor control and their association with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in T2DM patients followed up at a diabetes clinic in Southern, Sri Lanka.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A crosssectional study was conducted to examine the association between CIMT and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)in 300 T2DM patients. Both CIMT and its associations with modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors were examined using ultrasonography. The recommended optimal targets for risk factors were defined as glycated hemoglobin (HbA<sub>1C</sub>) < 7 %, absence of NAFLD, albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) < 30 mg, triglyceride (TG) < 150 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 100 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in men > 40 and in women > 50 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 130 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 80 mmHg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SBP, DBP, LDL-C, TG, HDL-C, HbA<sub>1C</sub>, and ACR were optimally controlled in 59.3%, 75.0%, 46.7%, 84.3%, 46.0%, 33.0%, and 18.7% of patients, respectively. Notably, nearly half of the study subjects did not have NAFLD. Only three patients (1%) had achieved all therapeutic targets. There were statistically significant differences in CIMT between optimally controlled TG and suboptimally controlled TG group (p = 0.027) and between the groups with and without NAFLD (p = 0.045) when adjusted for age and duration of diabetes. CIMT showed significant and positive associations with LDL-C (p = 0.024), TG (p = 0.026), and NAFLD (p = 0.005). Among these, the presence of NAFLD had the highest odds of having higher CIMT when compared to LDL-C and TG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of patients have not achieved the recommended targets for ASCVD risk factors and are at high risk of ASCVD. It is therefore necessary to identify the reasons for not achieving the treatment targets in order to reduce the ASCVD burden by controlling LDL-C, TG, and NAFLD.</p>","PeriodicalId":23361,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5821","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is closely associated with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). The objective of this study was to describe the degree of ASCVD risk factor control and their association with carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in T2DM patients followed up at a diabetes clinic in Southern, Sri Lanka.
Materials and methods: A crosssectional study was conducted to examine the association between CIMT and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)in 300 T2DM patients. Both CIMT and its associations with modifiable cardiometabolic risk factors were examined using ultrasonography. The recommended optimal targets for risk factors were defined as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) < 7 %, absence of NAFLD, albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) < 30 mg, triglyceride (TG) < 150 mg/dL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) < 100 mg/dL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) in men > 40 and in women > 50 mg/dL, systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 130 mmHg, and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) < 80 mmHg.
Results: SBP, DBP, LDL-C, TG, HDL-C, HbA1C, and ACR were optimally controlled in 59.3%, 75.0%, 46.7%, 84.3%, 46.0%, 33.0%, and 18.7% of patients, respectively. Notably, nearly half of the study subjects did not have NAFLD. Only three patients (1%) had achieved all therapeutic targets. There were statistically significant differences in CIMT between optimally controlled TG and suboptimally controlled TG group (p = 0.027) and between the groups with and without NAFLD (p = 0.045) when adjusted for age and duration of diabetes. CIMT showed significant and positive associations with LDL-C (p = 0.024), TG (p = 0.026), and NAFLD (p = 0.005). Among these, the presence of NAFLD had the highest odds of having higher CIMT when compared to LDL-C and TG.
Conclusion: The majority of patients have not achieved the recommended targets for ASCVD risk factors and are at high risk of ASCVD. It is therefore necessary to identify the reasons for not achieving the treatment targets in order to reduce the ASCVD burden by controlling LDL-C, TG, and NAFLD.
期刊介绍:
Turkish Journal of Medical sciences is a peer-reviewed comprehensive resource that provides critical up-to-date information on the broad spectrum of general medical sciences. The Journal intended to publish original medical scientific papers regarding the priority based on the prominence, significance, and timeliness of the findings. However since the audience of the Journal is not limited to any subspeciality in a wide variety of medical disciplines, the papers focusing on the technical details of a given medical subspeciality may not be evaluated for publication.