Impact of Downsampling Size and Interpretation Methods on Diagnostic Accuracy in Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-06 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1620/tjem.2024.J071
Ryusei Inamori, Tomofumi Kaneno, Ken Oba, Eichi Takaya, Daisuke Hirahara, Tomoya Kobayashi, Kurara Kawaguchi, Maki Adachi, Daiki Shimokawa, Kengo Takahashi, Hiroko Tsunoda, Takuya Ueda
{"title":"Impact of Downsampling Size and Interpretation Methods on Diagnostic Accuracy in Deep Learning Model for Breast Cancer Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images.","authors":"Ryusei Inamori, Tomofumi Kaneno, Ken Oba, Eichi Takaya, Daisuke Hirahara, Tomoya Kobayashi, Kurara Kawaguchi, Maki Adachi, Daiki Shimokawa, Kengo Takahashi, Hiroko Tsunoda, Takuya Ueda","doi":"10.1620/tjem.2024.J071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While deep learning (DL) models have shown promise in breast cancer diagnosis using digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images, the impact of varying matrix sizes and image interpolation methods on diagnostic accuracy remains unclear. Understanding these effects is essential to optimize preprocessing steps for DL models, which can lead to more efficient training processes, improved diagnostic accuracy, and better utilization of computational resources. Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent from the patients. In this study, 499 patients (29-90 years old, mean age 50.5 years) who underwent breast tomosynthesis were included. We performed downsampling to 256 × 256, 128 × 128, 64 × 64, and 32 × 32 using five image interpolation methods: Nearest (NN), Bilinear (BL), Bicubic (BC), Hamming (HM), and Lanczos (LC). The diagnostic accuracy of the DL model was assessed by mean AUC with its 95% confidence interval (CI). DL models with downsampled images to 256 × 256 pixels using the LC interpolation method showed a significantly lower AUC than the original 512 × 512 pixels model. This decrease was also observed with the 128 × 128 pixels DL models using HM and LC methods. All interpolation methods showed a significant decrease in AUC for the 64 × 64 and 32 × 32 pixels DL models. Our results highlight the significant impact of downsampling size and interpolation methods on the diagnostic performance of DL models. Understanding these effects is essential for optimizing preprocessing steps, which can enhance the accuracy and reliability of breast cancer diagnosis using DBT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":23187,"journal":{"name":"Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.2024.J071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While deep learning (DL) models have shown promise in breast cancer diagnosis using digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) images, the impact of varying matrix sizes and image interpolation methods on diagnostic accuracy remains unclear. Understanding these effects is essential to optimize preprocessing steps for DL models, which can lead to more efficient training processes, improved diagnostic accuracy, and better utilization of computational resources. Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study and waived the requirement for informed consent from the patients. In this study, 499 patients (29-90 years old, mean age 50.5 years) who underwent breast tomosynthesis were included. We performed downsampling to 256 × 256, 128 × 128, 64 × 64, and 32 × 32 using five image interpolation methods: Nearest (NN), Bilinear (BL), Bicubic (BC), Hamming (HM), and Lanczos (LC). The diagnostic accuracy of the DL model was assessed by mean AUC with its 95% confidence interval (CI). DL models with downsampled images to 256 × 256 pixels using the LC interpolation method showed a significantly lower AUC than the original 512 × 512 pixels model. This decrease was also observed with the 128 × 128 pixels DL models using HM and LC methods. All interpolation methods showed a significant decrease in AUC for the 64 × 64 and 32 × 32 pixels DL models. Our results highlight the significant impact of downsampling size and interpolation methods on the diagnostic performance of DL models. Understanding these effects is essential for optimizing preprocessing steps, which can enhance the accuracy and reliability of breast cancer diagnosis using DBT images.

使用数字乳腺断层合成图像的乳腺癌深度学习模型中,下采样大小和解释方法对诊断准确性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
171
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Our mission is to publish peer-reviewed papers in all branches of medical sciences including basic medicine, social medicine, clinical medicine, nursing sciences and disaster-prevention science, and to present new information of exceptional novelty, importance and interest to a broad readership of the TJEM. The TJEM is open to original articles in all branches of medical sciences from authors throughout the world. The TJEM also covers the fields of disaster-prevention science, including earthquake archeology. Case reports, which advance significantly our knowledge on medical sciences or practice, are also accepted. Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Commentary, and News and Views will also be considered. In particular, the TJEM welcomes full papers requiring prompt publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信