{"title":"Exploring heart rate variability in polycystic ovary syndrome: implications for cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Seyedeh Tarlan Mirzohreh, Padideh Panahi, Fariba Heidari","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02617-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent and complex endocrine disorder that affects women of reproductive age. It has significant implications for female endocrine function, reproductive health, and metabolic disturbances, including insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and dyslipidemia. Studies have shown that decreased heart rate variability (HRV), a marker of autonomic dysfunction, is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Recent research has focused on investigating autonomic function in PCOS, and some studies have suggested altered autonomic drive in these patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate cardiac autonomic function by analyzing HRV in women with PCOS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was prepared using PRISMA reporting guidelines. The databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Risk of Bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for non-RCTs. The GRADE approach was employed to evaluate the level of certainty in the evidence for each outcome. In order to identify the underlying cause of high heterogeneity, a subgroup analysis was conducted. Sensitivity analysis was checked. A random effect model was used and calculated a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen articles were included in the final analysis, varied in quality, ranging from a \"low\" to a \"high risk of bias\". Combined analyses indicated a notable decrease in HRV among individuals with PCOS compared to the control group. Significant changes were observed in SDNN (SMD: -0.763, 95%CI [-1.289 to -0.237], p=0.004), PNN50 (SMD: -1.245, 95%CI [-2.07, -0.419], p=0.003), LF/HF ratio (SMD: 0.670, 95%CI [0.248, 1.091], p=0.002), HFnu (SMD: -0.873, 95%CI [-1.257, -0.489], p=0.000), LFnu (SMD: 0.840, 95%CI [0.428, 1.251], p=0.000) and TP (SMD: -1.997, 95%CI [-3.306, -0.687], p=0.003). The heterogeneity was partially explained by types of study design. Subgroup analysis revealed significant alterations of HRV in normal-weighted and overweight PCOS cases. Conversely, no significant changes in HRV were observed in obese PCOS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this meta-analysis provide evidence suggesting diminished HRV in individuals with PCOS compared to non-PCOS control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"13 1","pages":"194"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02617-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent and complex endocrine disorder that affects women of reproductive age. It has significant implications for female endocrine function, reproductive health, and metabolic disturbances, including insulin resistance, impaired glucose tolerance, and dyslipidemia. Studies have shown that decreased heart rate variability (HRV), a marker of autonomic dysfunction, is associated with adverse cardiovascular events. Recent research has focused on investigating autonomic function in PCOS, and some studies have suggested altered autonomic drive in these patients. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate cardiac autonomic function by analyzing HRV in women with PCOS.
Methods: This systematic review was prepared using PRISMA reporting guidelines. The databases searched were PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane. Risk of Bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for non-RCTs. The GRADE approach was employed to evaluate the level of certainty in the evidence for each outcome. In order to identify the underlying cause of high heterogeneity, a subgroup analysis was conducted. Sensitivity analysis was checked. A random effect model was used and calculated a pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).
Results: Seventeen articles were included in the final analysis, varied in quality, ranging from a "low" to a "high risk of bias". Combined analyses indicated a notable decrease in HRV among individuals with PCOS compared to the control group. Significant changes were observed in SDNN (SMD: -0.763, 95%CI [-1.289 to -0.237], p=0.004), PNN50 (SMD: -1.245, 95%CI [-2.07, -0.419], p=0.003), LF/HF ratio (SMD: 0.670, 95%CI [0.248, 1.091], p=0.002), HFnu (SMD: -0.873, 95%CI [-1.257, -0.489], p=0.000), LFnu (SMD: 0.840, 95%CI [0.428, 1.251], p=0.000) and TP (SMD: -1.997, 95%CI [-3.306, -0.687], p=0.003). The heterogeneity was partially explained by types of study design. Subgroup analysis revealed significant alterations of HRV in normal-weighted and overweight PCOS cases. Conversely, no significant changes in HRV were observed in obese PCOS cases.
Conclusion: The findings of this meta-analysis provide evidence suggesting diminished HRV in individuals with PCOS compared to non-PCOS control group.
期刊介绍:
Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.