Addressing the Evidence Gap in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Need for a Pragmatic Randomized Trial Platform.

IF 7.8 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stroke Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048089
Hooman Kamel, Jose I Suarez, E Sander Connolly, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, William T Mack, Sherry Hsiang-Yi Chou, Katharina M Busl, Colin P Derdeyn, Neha S Dangayach, Jordan E Elm, Jonathan Beall, Nerissa U Ko
{"title":"Addressing the Evidence Gap in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: The Need for a Pragmatic Randomized Trial Platform.","authors":"Hooman Kamel, Jose I Suarez, E Sander Connolly, Sepideh Amin-Hanjani, William T Mack, Sherry Hsiang-Yi Chou, Katharina M Busl, Colin P Derdeyn, Neha S Dangayach, Jordan E Elm, Jonathan Beall, Nerissa U Ko","doi":"10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) occurs less often than other stroke types but affects younger patients, imposing a disproportionately high burden of long-term disability. Although management advances have improved outcomes over time, relatively few aSAH treatments have been tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). One lesson learned from COVID-19 is that trial platforms can facilitate the efficient execution of multicenter RCTs even in complex diseases during challenging conditions. An aSAH trial platform with standardized eligibility criteria, randomization procedures, and end point definitions would enable the study of multiple targeted interventions in a perpetual manner, with treatments entering and leaving the platform based on predefined decision algorithms. An umbrella institutional review board protocol and clinical trial agreement would allow individual arms to be efficiently added as amendments rather than stand-alone protocols. Standardized case report forms using the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke common data elements and general protocol standardization across arms would create synergies for data management and monitoring. A Bayesian analysis framework would emphasize frequent interim looks to enable early termination of trial arms for futility, common controls, borrowing of information across arms, and adaptive designs. A protocol development committee would assist investigators and encourage pragmatic designs to maximize generalizability, reduce site burden, and execute trials efficiently and cost-effectively. Despite decades of steady clinical progress in the management of aSAH, poor patient outcomes remain common, and despite the increasing availability of RCT data in other fields, it remains difficult to perform RCTs to guide more effective care for aSAH. The development of a platform for pragmatic RCTs in aSAH would help close the evidence gap between aSAH and other stroke types and improve outcomes for this important disease with its disproportionate public health burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":21989,"journal":{"name":"Stroke","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347113/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048089","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) occurs less often than other stroke types but affects younger patients, imposing a disproportionately high burden of long-term disability. Although management advances have improved outcomes over time, relatively few aSAH treatments have been tested in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). One lesson learned from COVID-19 is that trial platforms can facilitate the efficient execution of multicenter RCTs even in complex diseases during challenging conditions. An aSAH trial platform with standardized eligibility criteria, randomization procedures, and end point definitions would enable the study of multiple targeted interventions in a perpetual manner, with treatments entering and leaving the platform based on predefined decision algorithms. An umbrella institutional review board protocol and clinical trial agreement would allow individual arms to be efficiently added as amendments rather than stand-alone protocols. Standardized case report forms using the National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke common data elements and general protocol standardization across arms would create synergies for data management and monitoring. A Bayesian analysis framework would emphasize frequent interim looks to enable early termination of trial arms for futility, common controls, borrowing of information across arms, and adaptive designs. A protocol development committee would assist investigators and encourage pragmatic designs to maximize generalizability, reduce site burden, and execute trials efficiently and cost-effectively. Despite decades of steady clinical progress in the management of aSAH, poor patient outcomes remain common, and despite the increasing availability of RCT data in other fields, it remains difficult to perform RCTs to guide more effective care for aSAH. The development of a platform for pragmatic RCTs in aSAH would help close the evidence gap between aSAH and other stroke types and improve outcomes for this important disease with its disproportionate public health burden.

缩小动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血的证据差距:需要一个务实的随机试验平台。
动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)的发病率低于其他类型的中风,但患者年龄较轻,造成的长期残疾负担过重。虽然随着时间的推移,治疗方法的进步改善了预后,但在随机临床试验(RCT)中测试过的蛛网膜下腔出血治疗方法相对较少。从 COVID-19 中汲取的一个经验是,试验平台可以促进多中心 RCT 的高效执行,即使是在条件艰苦的复杂疾病中也不例外。aSAH 试验平台具有标准化的资格标准、随机化程序和终点定义,可以对多种目标干预措施进行永久性研究,治疗方法可根据预定义的决策算法进入或退出平台。总括性的机构审查委员会协议和临床试验协议将允许以修正案的形式而不是以独立协议的形式有效地添加单个臂。使用美国国立卫生研究院/美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所通用数据元素的标准化病例报告表以及各臂的一般方案标准化将为数据管理和监测带来协同效应。贝叶斯分析框架将强调频繁的中期检查,以便尽早终止无用的试验臂、共同控制、跨臂信息借用和适应性设计。方案制定委员会将协助研究人员并鼓励务实的设计,以最大限度地提高可推广性,减轻研究机构的负担,并以高效、经济的方式执行试验。尽管数十年来aSAH的临床治疗取得了稳步进展,但患者预后不佳的情况仍很普遍,而且尽管其他领域的RCT数据越来越多,但仍很难通过RCT来指导更有效的aSAH治疗。开发一个针对 aSAH 的务实 RCT 平台将有助于缩小 aSAH 与其他类型卒中之间的证据差距,并改善这种对公共卫生造成极大负担的重要疾病的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stroke
Stroke 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
6.00%
发文量
2021
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Stroke is a monthly publication that collates reports of clinical and basic investigation of any aspect of the cerebral circulation and its diseases. The publication covers a wide range of disciplines including anesthesiology, critical care medicine, epidemiology, internal medicine, neurology, neuro-ophthalmology, neuropathology, neuropsychology, neurosurgery, nuclear medicine, nursing, radiology, rehabilitation, speech pathology, vascular physiology, and vascular surgery. The audience of Stroke includes neurologists, basic scientists, cardiologists, vascular surgeons, internists, interventionalists, neurosurgeons, nurses, and physiatrists. Stroke is indexed in Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAB Abstracts, Chemical Abstracts, CINAHL, Current Contents, Embase, MEDLINE, and Science Citation Index Expanded.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信