Body Mass and Foot-dominance Disparities in the Foot Plantar Pressure Parameters of Older Women.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Min Liu, Yalu Zhang, Ning Kang, Donghui Mei, Erya Wen, Dongmin Wang, Gong Chen
{"title":"Body Mass and Foot-dominance Disparities in the Foot Plantar Pressure Parameters of Older Women.","authors":"Min Liu, Yalu Zhang, Ning Kang, Donghui Mei, Erya Wen, Dongmin Wang, Gong Chen","doi":"10.7547/23-210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the effects of foot dominance and body mass on foot plantar pressures in older women of regular, overweight, and obese weights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>96 female adults were divided into regular-weight group (68.30 ± 4.19 yr), overweight group (69.88 ± 3.76 yr), and obesity group (68.47 ± 3.67 yr) based on their body mass index scores. Footscan® plantar pressure test system was used to assess the dynamic plantar pressures, and parameters were collected from risk analysis, foot axis analysis, single foot timing analysis, and pressure analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>(1) The local risks of lateral forefoot and midfoot, the minimum and maximum subtalar joint angles, the flexibility of subtalar joint, foot flat phase, as well as the average pressures on toes, metatarsals,, midfoot, and lateral heel, with the peak pressures on toe 2-5, metatarsal 2, metatarsal 5, midfoot, and lateral heel had significant within-subject differences. (2) The phases of initial contact and foot flat, the average pressures on toe 2-5, metatarsals, midfoot, and heels, with the peak pressures on metatarsal 1-4, midfoot, and heels exhibited significant between-subjects differences. (3) There was an interaction effect of foot dominance and body mass index on the flexibility of subtalar joint.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The non-dominant foot works better for stability, especially when touching on and off the ground. The dominant foot works better for propulsion but is more susceptible to pain, injury, and falls. For obese older women, the forefoot and midfoot are primarily responsible for maintaining stability, but the lateral midfoot and hindfoot are more prone to pain and discomfort.</p>","PeriodicalId":17241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7547/23-210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the effects of foot dominance and body mass on foot plantar pressures in older women of regular, overweight, and obese weights.

Methods: 96 female adults were divided into regular-weight group (68.30 ± 4.19 yr), overweight group (69.88 ± 3.76 yr), and obesity group (68.47 ± 3.67 yr) based on their body mass index scores. Footscan® plantar pressure test system was used to assess the dynamic plantar pressures, and parameters were collected from risk analysis, foot axis analysis, single foot timing analysis, and pressure analysis.

Results: (1) The local risks of lateral forefoot and midfoot, the minimum and maximum subtalar joint angles, the flexibility of subtalar joint, foot flat phase, as well as the average pressures on toes, metatarsals,, midfoot, and lateral heel, with the peak pressures on toe 2-5, metatarsal 2, metatarsal 5, midfoot, and lateral heel had significant within-subject differences. (2) The phases of initial contact and foot flat, the average pressures on toe 2-5, metatarsals, midfoot, and heels, with the peak pressures on metatarsal 1-4, midfoot, and heels exhibited significant between-subjects differences. (3) There was an interaction effect of foot dominance and body mass index on the flexibility of subtalar joint.

Conclusions: The non-dominant foot works better for stability, especially when touching on and off the ground. The dominant foot works better for propulsion but is more susceptible to pain, injury, and falls. For obese older women, the forefoot and midfoot are primarily responsible for maintaining stability, but the lateral midfoot and hindfoot are more prone to pain and discomfort.

老年妇女足底压力参数的体重和足部优势差异。
目的:研究足部优势和体重对体重正常、超重和肥胖老年妇女足底压力的影响:方法:根据体重指数将 96 名成年女性分为正常体重组(68.30±4.19 岁)、超重组(69.88±3.76 岁)和肥胖组(68.47±3.67 岁)。使用 Footscan® 足底压力测试系统评估动态足底压力,并从风险分析、足轴分析、单足定时分析和压力分析中收集参数。结果:(1)前足外侧和中足外侧的局部风险、跗关节最小和最大角度、跗关节灵活性、平足阶段以及脚趾、跖骨、中足和外侧脚跟的平均压力,其中脚趾2-5、跖骨2、跖骨5、中足和外侧脚跟的峰值压力在受试者内部存在显著差异。(2) 初始接触和平足阶段,脚趾 2-5、跖骨、脚掌中部和脚跟的平均压力,以及跖骨 1-4、脚掌中部和脚跟的峰值压力表现出显著的受试者间差异。(3)足部优势和体重指数对踝关节灵活性有交互影响:结论:非优势足更利于稳定,尤其是在接触地面和离开地面时。结论:非优势足的稳定性更好,尤其是在接触地面和离开地面时;优势足的推进力更好,但更容易疼痛、受伤和跌倒。对于肥胖的老年妇女来说,前足和中足主要负责保持稳定,但外侧中足和后足更容易出现疼痛和不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, the official journal of the Association, is the oldest and most frequently cited peer-reviewed journal in the profession of foot and ankle medicine. Founded in 1907 and appearing 6 times per year, it publishes research studies, case reports, literature reviews, special communications, clinical correspondence, letters to the editor, book reviews, and various other types of submissions. The Journal is included in major indexing and abstracting services for biomedical literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信