John K Brooks, Lillian M Height, Beverly A Jimenez, Anthony C Anyadike, Joseph G Kvint, Jeffery B Price
{"title":"Successful completion of orthodontic therapy in a patient with osteopetrosis: Case Report.","authors":"John K Brooks, Lillian M Height, Beverly A Jimenez, Anthony C Anyadike, Joseph G Kvint, Jeffery B Price","doi":"10.1177/14653125241264294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Orthodontic therapy in patients with osteopetrosis (OP) of the jaws has typically been contraindicated owing to the presence of poorly perfused and extremely compact bone, and the potential risk for infection and osteomyelitis. As such, completed orthodontic cases in association with OP have rarely been published.</p><p><strong>Patient concerns: </strong>A patient aged 14 years 6 months, with no known diagnosis of OP, sought orthodontic assessment for anterior crowding.</p><p><strong>Clinical findings: </strong>The patient exhibited a straight facial profile and increased mandibular facial height, competent lips, shallow mentolabial sulcus with mild mentalis strain, flat/reverse smile arc and wide buccal corridors on smiling.</p><p><strong>Primary diagnosis: </strong>The patient had a Class I incisor relationship on Class I skeletal bases with bilateral Class I molars and Class II canine relationships. This was complicated by a crossbite involving the lateral incisors and a Bolton discrepancy due to small maxillary lateral incisors. A radiologic assessment revealed polyostotic OP of the oromaxillofacial complex.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Treatment consisted of maxillary and mandibular fixed orthodontic therapy, bite turbos and elastics to level and align the dentition. Extractions of permanent teeth were not needed.</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>At the conclusion of treatment, there was a slight left Class II malocclusion, with incomplete intercuspation on the left side due to tooth size discrepancy, possibly attributed to inadequate elastics compliance and the presence of osteopetrotic bone. The treatment was completed in 3 years, 1 year longer than anticipated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This report represents the second published account of a patient with OP successfully managed with comprehensive orthodontic care and without osseous complications. Obtaining cephalometric measurements on OP-affected patients may be imprecise owing to the presence of extremely dense bone and difficulty to identify bony landmarks. To reduce osteopetrotic sequelae, attending clinicians should consider reduced exertional orthodontic forces and closely monitor patients for adverse alveolar events.</p>","PeriodicalId":16677,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthodontics","volume":" ","pages":"14653125241264294"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14653125241264294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Orthodontic therapy in patients with osteopetrosis (OP) of the jaws has typically been contraindicated owing to the presence of poorly perfused and extremely compact bone, and the potential risk for infection and osteomyelitis. As such, completed orthodontic cases in association with OP have rarely been published.
Patient concerns: A patient aged 14 years 6 months, with no known diagnosis of OP, sought orthodontic assessment for anterior crowding.
Clinical findings: The patient exhibited a straight facial profile and increased mandibular facial height, competent lips, shallow mentolabial sulcus with mild mentalis strain, flat/reverse smile arc and wide buccal corridors on smiling.
Primary diagnosis: The patient had a Class I incisor relationship on Class I skeletal bases with bilateral Class I molars and Class II canine relationships. This was complicated by a crossbite involving the lateral incisors and a Bolton discrepancy due to small maxillary lateral incisors. A radiologic assessment revealed polyostotic OP of the oromaxillofacial complex.
Interventions: Treatment consisted of maxillary and mandibular fixed orthodontic therapy, bite turbos and elastics to level and align the dentition. Extractions of permanent teeth were not needed.
Outcomes: At the conclusion of treatment, there was a slight left Class II malocclusion, with incomplete intercuspation on the left side due to tooth size discrepancy, possibly attributed to inadequate elastics compliance and the presence of osteopetrotic bone. The treatment was completed in 3 years, 1 year longer than anticipated.
Conclusion: This report represents the second published account of a patient with OP successfully managed with comprehensive orthodontic care and without osseous complications. Obtaining cephalometric measurements on OP-affected patients may be imprecise owing to the presence of extremely dense bone and difficulty to identify bony landmarks. To reduce osteopetrotic sequelae, attending clinicians should consider reduced exertional orthodontic forces and closely monitor patients for adverse alveolar events.
简介:颌骨骨化症(OP)患者的正畸治疗通常是禁忌症,原因是患者的骨灌注不良,骨质极其致密,存在感染和骨髓炎的潜在风险。因此,与 OP 相关的已完成正畸病例很少发表:患者 14 岁 6 个月,未确诊 OP,因前牙拥挤寻求正畸评估:临床发现:患者面部轮廓平直,下颌面部高度增加,嘴唇干练,门唇沟变浅,伴有轻度心肌劳损,平/反向笑弧,微笑时颊廊宽大:患者的切牙关系为 I 类,骨骼基底为 I 类,双侧臼齿为 I 类,犬齿关系为 II 类。由于上颌侧切牙较小,导致侧切牙交叉咬合和博尔顿差异。放射学评估显示,该患儿的口颌面复合体存在多骨OP:治疗包括上颌和下颌固定正畸治疗、咬合涡轮和弹性矫正器,以平整和排列牙齿。无需拔除恒牙:治疗结束时,左侧有轻微的二类错牙合畸形,由于牙齿大小不一,左侧牙间隙不完整,这可能是由于弹力袜的顺应性不足以及存在骨质腐蚀性骨质造成的。治疗在 3 年内完成,比预期时间长 1 年:本报告是发表的第二例通过全面正畸护理成功治疗且无骨质增生并发症的 OP 患者的案例。由于受 OP 影响的患者存在极度致密的骨质,且难以识别骨质标志,因此对其进行头颅测量可能并不精确。为减少骨质腐蚀后遗症,临床主治医生应考虑减少正畸时的外力,并密切监测患者的牙槽骨不良事件。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Orthodontics has an international circulation, publishing papers from throughout the world. The official journal of the British Orthodontic Society, it aims to publish high quality, evidence-based, clinically orientated or clinically relevant original research papers that will underpin evidence based orthodontic care. It particularly welcomes reports on prospective research into different treatment methods and techniques but also systematic reviews, meta-analyses and studies which will stimulate interest in new developments. Regular features include original papers on clinically relevant topics, clinical case reports, reviews of the orthodontic literature, editorials, book reviews, correspondence and other features of interest to the orthodontic community. The Journal is published in full colour throughout.