The Effects of the Use of Plyometric Exercises with and without the Ball in the Development of Explosive Strength in Volleyball.

IF 2.6 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Giovanni Esposito, Gaetano Altavilla, Giuseppe Giardullo, Rosario Ceruso, Tiziana D'Isanto
{"title":"The Effects of the Use of Plyometric Exercises with and without the Ball in the Development of Explosive Strength in Volleyball.","authors":"Giovanni Esposito, Gaetano Altavilla, Giuseppe Giardullo, Rosario Ceruso, Tiziana D'Isanto","doi":"10.3390/jfmk9030126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Volleyball primarily focuses on technical and tactical training with a ball. However, there is growing interest in integrating fitness training into volleyball practice, particularly to enhance explosive strength through plyometric methods, but there is a lack of a direct scientific comparison between training with and without the ball. This study aimed to compare the effects of two training protocols on volleyball players. One protocol combined plyometric exercises with technical gestures (wall drills) using the ball, while the other protocol excluded the ball during plyometric exercises. Twenty male volleyball players (aged 18.6 ± 0.3 years, height 189.8 ± 2.2 cm, weight 79.4 ± 1.6 kg) were divided into experimental (with ball) and control (without ball) groups. The analysis of the results highlights significant improvements in both the squat jumps (SJs) and the countermovement jumps with arm swing (CMJas) for both groups. While there were no significant differences between the groups for SJ, significant differences emerged in CMJas, indicating varied training effects. Specifically, the interaction effect was significant (<i>p</i> = 0.004), demonstrating a meaningful distinction in performance improvements between the two groups. The effect size of the interaction is moderate (η<sub>p</sub><sup>2</sup> = 0.37, 95% CI: 0; 0.91). These results suggest that incorporating a ball into plyometric training can be beneficial for developing explosive strength in a different way, thereby improving performance due to the motivational stimulus provided. However, given the specificity of the sample and the training protocols used, further studies are needed to confirm these results and evaluate their applicability to a larger sample of volleyball players.</p>","PeriodicalId":16052,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270292/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk9030126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Volleyball primarily focuses on technical and tactical training with a ball. However, there is growing interest in integrating fitness training into volleyball practice, particularly to enhance explosive strength through plyometric methods, but there is a lack of a direct scientific comparison between training with and without the ball. This study aimed to compare the effects of two training protocols on volleyball players. One protocol combined plyometric exercises with technical gestures (wall drills) using the ball, while the other protocol excluded the ball during plyometric exercises. Twenty male volleyball players (aged 18.6 ± 0.3 years, height 189.8 ± 2.2 cm, weight 79.4 ± 1.6 kg) were divided into experimental (with ball) and control (without ball) groups. The analysis of the results highlights significant improvements in both the squat jumps (SJs) and the countermovement jumps with arm swing (CMJas) for both groups. While there were no significant differences between the groups for SJ, significant differences emerged in CMJas, indicating varied training effects. Specifically, the interaction effect was significant (p = 0.004), demonstrating a meaningful distinction in performance improvements between the two groups. The effect size of the interaction is moderate (ηp2 = 0.37, 95% CI: 0; 0.91). These results suggest that incorporating a ball into plyometric training can be beneficial for developing explosive strength in a different way, thereby improving performance due to the motivational stimulus provided. However, given the specificity of the sample and the training protocols used, further studies are needed to confirm these results and evaluate their applicability to a larger sample of volleyball players.

有球和无球负重练习对排球运动员爆发力发展的影响。
排球运动主要侧重于带球的技术和战术训练。然而,人们对将体能训练融入排球训练的兴趣日益浓厚,尤其是通过负重方法增强爆发力,但有球训练和无球训练之间缺乏直接的科学比较。本研究旨在比较两种训练方案对排球运动员的影响。其中一个训练方案将负重练习与使用球的技术手势(墙壁练习)相结合,而另一个方案则在负重练习中不使用球。20 名男子排球运动员(年龄 18.6 ± 0.3 岁,身高 189.8 ± 2.2 厘米,体重 79.4 ± 1.6 千克)被分为实验组(有球)和对照组(无球)。结果分析显示,实验组和对照组的深蹲跳(SJs)和摆臂反身跳(CMJas)均有显著提高。虽然在 SJ 方面组间没有明显差异,但在 CMJas 方面出现了明显差异,这表明训练效果各不相同。具体来说,交互作用效果显著(p = 0.004),表明两组在成绩提高方面存在显著差异。交互作用的效应大小适中(ηp2 = 0.37,95% CI:0;0.91)。这些结果表明,将球纳入负重训练有利于以不同的方式发展爆发力,从而在动机刺激下提高成绩。然而,鉴于样本的特殊性和所使用的训练方案,还需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果,并评估其对更大样本排球运动员的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology
Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信