Longting Lin, Yueming Wang, Chushuang Chen, Andrew Bivard, Kenneth Butcher, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Neil J Spratt, Christopher R Levi, Xin Cheng, Qiang Dong, Mark W Parsons
{"title":"Exploring ischemic core growth rate and endovascular therapy benefit in large core patients.","authors":"Longting Lin, Yueming Wang, Chushuang Chen, Andrew Bivard, Kenneth Butcher, Carlos Garcia-Esperon, Neil J Spratt, Christopher R Levi, Xin Cheng, Qiang Dong, Mark W Parsons","doi":"10.1177/0271678X241242911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After stroke onset, ischemic brain tissue will progress to infarction unless blood flow is restored. Core growth rate measures the infarction speed from stroke onset. This multicenter cohort study aimed to explore whether core growth rate influences benefit from the reperfusion treatment of endovascular thrombectomy in large ischemic core stroke patients. It identified 134 patients with large core volume >70 mL assessed on brain perfusion image within 9 hours of stroke onset. Of 134 patients, 71 received endovascular thrombectomy and 63 did not receive the treatment. Overall, poor outcomes were frequent, with 3-month severed disability or death rate at 56% in treatment group and 68% in no treatment group (p = 0.156). Patients were then stratified by core growth rate. For patients with 'ultrafast core growth' of >70 mL/hour, rates of poor outcome were especially high in patients without endovascular thrombectomy (n = 13/14, 93%) and relatively lower in patients received the treatment (n = 12/20, 60%, p = 0.033). In contrast, for patients with core growth rate <70 mL/hour, there was not a large difference in poor outcomes between patients with and without the treatment (55% vs. 61%, p = 0.522). Therefore, patients with 'ultrafast core growth' might stand to benefit the most from endovascular treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":15325,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X241242911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
After stroke onset, ischemic brain tissue will progress to infarction unless blood flow is restored. Core growth rate measures the infarction speed from stroke onset. This multicenter cohort study aimed to explore whether core growth rate influences benefit from the reperfusion treatment of endovascular thrombectomy in large ischemic core stroke patients. It identified 134 patients with large core volume >70 mL assessed on brain perfusion image within 9 hours of stroke onset. Of 134 patients, 71 received endovascular thrombectomy and 63 did not receive the treatment. Overall, poor outcomes were frequent, with 3-month severed disability or death rate at 56% in treatment group and 68% in no treatment group (p = 0.156). Patients were then stratified by core growth rate. For patients with 'ultrafast core growth' of >70 mL/hour, rates of poor outcome were especially high in patients without endovascular thrombectomy (n = 13/14, 93%) and relatively lower in patients received the treatment (n = 12/20, 60%, p = 0.033). In contrast, for patients with core growth rate <70 mL/hour, there was not a large difference in poor outcomes between patients with and without the treatment (55% vs. 61%, p = 0.522). Therefore, patients with 'ultrafast core growth' might stand to benefit the most from endovascular treatment.
期刊介绍:
JCBFM is the official journal of the International Society for Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, which is committed to publishing high quality, independently peer-reviewed research and review material. JCBFM stands at the interface between basic and clinical neurovascular research, and features timely and relevant research highlighting experimental, theoretical, and clinical aspects of brain circulation, metabolism and imaging. The journal is relevant to any physician or scientist with an interest in brain function, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral vascular regulation and brain metabolism, including neurologists, neurochemists, physiologists, pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, neuropathologists and neuroscientists.