Raman spectroscopy as an alternative rapid microbial bioburden test method for continuous, automated detection of contamination in biopharmaceutical drug substance manufacturing.
IF 3.2 3区 生物学Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Erin M Masucci, James E Hauschild, Helena M Gisler, Erin M Lester, Karin M Balss
{"title":"Raman spectroscopy as an alternative rapid microbial bioburden test method for continuous, automated detection of contamination in biopharmaceutical drug substance manufacturing.","authors":"Erin M Masucci, James E Hauschild, Helena M Gisler, Erin M Lester, Karin M Balss","doi":"10.1093/jambio/lxae188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate an in-line Raman method capable of detecting accidental microbial contamination in pharmaceutical vessels, such as bioreactors producing monoclonal antibodies via cell culture.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The Raman method consists of a multivariate model built from Raman spectra collected in-line during reduced-scale bioreactor batches producing a monoclonal antibody, as well as a reduced-scale process with intentional spiking of representative compendial method microorganisms (n = 4). The orthogonal partial least squares regression discriminant analysis model (OPLS-DA) area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were 0.96, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Furthermore, the model successfully detected contamination in an accidentally contaminated manufacturing-scale batch. In all cases, the time to detection (TTD) for Raman was superior compared to offline, traditional microbiological culturing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Raman OPLS-DA method met acceptance criteria for equivalent decision making to be considered a viable alternative to the compendial method for in-process bioburden testing. The in-line method is automated, non-destructive, and provides a continuous assessment of bioburden compared to an offline compendial method, which is manual, results in loss of product, and in practice is only collected once daily and requires 3-5 days for enumeration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jambio/lxae188","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: To investigate an in-line Raman method capable of detecting accidental microbial contamination in pharmaceutical vessels, such as bioreactors producing monoclonal antibodies via cell culture.
Methods and results: The Raman method consists of a multivariate model built from Raman spectra collected in-line during reduced-scale bioreactor batches producing a monoclonal antibody, as well as a reduced-scale process with intentional spiking of representative compendial method microorganisms (n = 4). The orthogonal partial least squares regression discriminant analysis model (OPLS-DA) area under the curve (AUC), specificity and sensitivity were 0.96, 0.99, and 0.95, respectively. Furthermore, the model successfully detected contamination in an accidentally contaminated manufacturing-scale batch. In all cases, the time to detection (TTD) for Raman was superior compared to offline, traditional microbiological culturing.
Conclusions: The Raman OPLS-DA method met acceptance criteria for equivalent decision making to be considered a viable alternative to the compendial method for in-process bioburden testing. The in-line method is automated, non-destructive, and provides a continuous assessment of bioburden compared to an offline compendial method, which is manual, results in loss of product, and in practice is only collected once daily and requires 3-5 days for enumeration.
期刊介绍:
Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.