P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mattia Galli, Claudio Laudani, Giovanni Occhipinti, Marco Spagnolo, Felice Gragnano, Domenico D'Amario, Eliano Pio Navarese, Roxana Mehran, Marco Valgimigli, Davide Capodanno, Dominick J Angiolillo
{"title":"P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mattia Galli, Claudio Laudani, Giovanni Occhipinti, Marco Spagnolo, Felice Gragnano, Domenico D'Amario, Eliano Pio Navarese, Roxana Mehran, Marco Valgimigli, Davide Capodanno, Dominick J Angiolillo","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may balance ischaemic and bleeding risks in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it remains uncertain how different P2Y12 inhibitors used as monotherapy affect outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Randomized controlled trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT (≤3 months) vs. 12-month DAPT in ACS were included. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All analyses included an interaction term for the P2Y12 inhibitor used as monotherapy. Trial sequential analyses were run to explore whether the effect estimate of each outcome may be affected by further studies. Seven trials encompassing 27 284 ACS patients were included. Compared with 12-month DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT was associated with no difference in MACE [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.12] and a significant reduction in net adverse clinical events (NACE) (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94), any bleeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66), and major bleeding (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.60). Significant interactions for subgroup difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel monotherapy were found for MACE (Pint = 0.016), all-cause death (Pint = 0.042), NACE (Pint = 0.018), and myocardial infarction (Pint = 0.028). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusive evidence of improved NACE with ticagrelor, but not with clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with standard DAPT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with ACS, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT halves bleeding without increasing ischaemic events compared with standard DAPT. Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel monotherapy, reduced MACE, NACE, and mortality compared with standard DAPT, supporting its use after aspirin discontinuation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvae057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) may balance ischaemic and bleeding risks in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, it remains uncertain how different P2Y12 inhibitors used as monotherapy affect outcomes.

Methods and results: Randomized controlled trials comparing P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT (≤3 months) vs. 12-month DAPT in ACS were included. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). All analyses included an interaction term for the P2Y12 inhibitor used as monotherapy. Trial sequential analyses were run to explore whether the effect estimate of each outcome may be affected by further studies. Seven trials encompassing 27 284 ACS patients were included. Compared with 12-month DAPT, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after a short course of DAPT was associated with no difference in MACE [odds ratio (OR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-1.12] and a significant reduction in net adverse clinical events (NACE) (OR 0.75; 95% CI 0.60-0.94), any bleeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.43-0.66), and major bleeding (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.60). Significant interactions for subgroup difference between ticagrelor and clopidogrel monotherapy were found for MACE (Pint = 0.016), all-cause death (Pint = 0.042), NACE (Pint = 0.018), and myocardial infarction (Pint = 0.028). Trial sequential analysis showed conclusive evidence of improved NACE with ticagrelor, but not with clopidogrel monotherapy, compared with standard DAPT.

Conclusions: In patients with ACS, P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after short DAPT halves bleeding without increasing ischaemic events compared with standard DAPT. Ticagrelor, but not clopidogrel monotherapy, reduced MACE, NACE, and mortality compared with standard DAPT, supporting its use after aspirin discontinuation.

急性冠状动脉综合征短期 DAPT 后的 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗:系统回顾和 Meta 分析》。
背景:在短期双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)后使用 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗可平衡急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者的缺血和出血风险。然而,目前仍不确定不同的 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗对疗效有何影响:纳入的随机对照试验比较了急性冠状动脉综合征患者短期 DAPT 疗程(≤3 个月)后 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与 12 个月 DAPT 疗程。主要终点是主要心血管不良事件(MACE)。所有分析均包含单药 P2Y12 抑制剂的交互项。进行了试验序列分析,以探讨进一步的研究是否会影响各项结果的效果估计:共纳入七项试验,涵盖27284名ACS患者。与为期12个月的DAPT相比,P2Y12抑制剂单药治疗与短期DAPT疗程后的MACE无差别(OR 0.92,95% CI 0.76-1.12),但可显著减少净不良临床事件(NACE)(OR 0.75;95% CI 0.60-0.94)、任何出血(OR 0.54,95% CI 0.43-0.66)和大出血(OR 0.47,95% CI 0.37-0.60)。在MACE(pint=0.016)、全因死亡(pint=0.042)、NACE(pint=0.018)和心肌梗死(pint=0.028)方面,发现替卡格雷与氯吡格雷单药治疗的亚组差异存在显著交互作用。试验序列分析表明,与标准DAPT相比,ticagrelor改善了NACE,而氯吡格雷单药治疗则没有:结论:对于 ACS 患者,与标准 DAPT 相比,短期 DAPT 后的 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗可使出血减半,但不会增加缺血事件。与标准 DAPT 相比,替卡格雷(而非氯吡格雷)单药治疗可减少 MACE、NACE 和死亡率,支持在停用阿司匹林后使用替卡格雷。协议注册:本研究已在 PROSPERO 注册(CRD42023494797)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
14.10%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field. While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信