A Novel Device for the Evaluation of In Vitro Bacterial Colonization in Membranes for Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration.

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Ana Clara Kuerten Gil, Eugenio A D Merino, Diogo Pontes Costa, César Nunes Giracca, Ricardo Mazzon, Gabriel Leonardo Magrin, Josiane de Almeida, Cesar Augusto Magalhães Benfatti
{"title":"A Novel Device for the Evaluation of In Vitro Bacterial Colonization in Membranes for Guided Tissue and Bone Regeneration.","authors":"Ana Clara Kuerten Gil, Eugenio A D Merino, Diogo Pontes Costa, César Nunes Giracca, Ricardo Mazzon, Gabriel Leonardo Magrin, Josiane de Almeida, Cesar Augusto Magalhães Benfatti","doi":"10.3390/dj12070202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate, in vitro, the efficiency of a novel apparatus to test the adherence and penetration of bacteria on different membranes for guided regeneration. <b>Methodology:</b> To create the 3D device, Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems were used. Three types of biomaterials were tested (<i>n</i> = 6): (DT) a collagen membrane; (DS) a polymer membrane; and (LP) a dense polytetrafluoroethylene barrier. The biomaterials were adapted to the apparatuses and challenged with two different monospecies bacterial culture of <i>A. actinomycetemcomitans b</i> and <i>S. mutans</i>. After 2 h, bacterial adherence and penetration were quantified by counting the number of colony-forming units (CFUs). Two specimens from each group were used for image analysis using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Statistical analysis was performed. <b>Findings:</b> The DS group had a higher adherence of <i>S. mutans</i> compared to <i>A. actinomycetemcomitans b</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.05). There was less adherence of <i>A. actinomycetemcomitans b</i> in the DS group, compared to the LP (<i>p</i> = 0.011) and DT (<i>p</i> < 0.001) groups. Only the membranes allowed penetration, which was blocked by barriers. The DT group allowed a greater penetration of <i>S. mutans</i> to occur compared to <i>A. actinomycetemcomitans b</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.009), which showed a higher penetration into the DS membranes compared to <i>S. mutans</i> (<i>p</i> = 0.016). The penetration of <i>A. actinomycetemcomitans b</i> through DS was higher compared to its penetration through DT and LP (<i>p</i> < 0.01 for both). DT and DS allowed a greater penetration of <i>S. mutans</i> to occur compared to LP, which prevented both bacterial species from penetrating. <b>Conclusion:</b> The apparatus allowed for the settlement and complete sealing of the biomaterials, enabling standardization.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11275268/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate, in vitro, the efficiency of a novel apparatus to test the adherence and penetration of bacteria on different membranes for guided regeneration. Methodology: To create the 3D device, Computer Aided Design/Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) systems were used. Three types of biomaterials were tested (n = 6): (DT) a collagen membrane; (DS) a polymer membrane; and (LP) a dense polytetrafluoroethylene barrier. The biomaterials were adapted to the apparatuses and challenged with two different monospecies bacterial culture of A. actinomycetemcomitans b and S. mutans. After 2 h, bacterial adherence and penetration were quantified by counting the number of colony-forming units (CFUs). Two specimens from each group were used for image analysis using Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Statistical analysis was performed. Findings: The DS group had a higher adherence of S. mutans compared to A. actinomycetemcomitans b (p = 0.05). There was less adherence of A. actinomycetemcomitans b in the DS group, compared to the LP (p = 0.011) and DT (p < 0.001) groups. Only the membranes allowed penetration, which was blocked by barriers. The DT group allowed a greater penetration of S. mutans to occur compared to A. actinomycetemcomitans b (p = 0.009), which showed a higher penetration into the DS membranes compared to S. mutans (p = 0.016). The penetration of A. actinomycetemcomitans b through DS was higher compared to its penetration through DT and LP (p < 0.01 for both). DT and DS allowed a greater penetration of S. mutans to occur compared to LP, which prevented both bacterial species from penetrating. Conclusion: The apparatus allowed for the settlement and complete sealing of the biomaterials, enabling standardization.

用于评估体外细菌在引导组织和骨骼再生的薄膜中定植情况的新型装置。
目的:在体外评估一种新型仪器的效率,以测试细菌在不同膜上的附着和渗透情况,从而引导再生。方法:使用计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)系统制作三维装置。测试了三种生物材料(n = 6):(DT)胶原蛋白膜;(DS)聚合物膜;(LP)致密聚四氟乙烯屏障。将生物材料与器械相适应,并用两种不同的单种细菌培养物(放线菌 b 和变异单胞菌)进行挑战。2 小时后,通过计数菌落形成单位(CFU)的数量来量化细菌的附着和穿透情况。使用激光共聚焦扫描显微镜对每组的两个标本进行图像分析。进行统计分析。研究结果与放线菌 b 相比,DS 组的 S. mutans 粘附率更高(p = 0.05)。与 LP 组(p = 0.011)和 DT 组(p < 0.001)相比,DS 组中放线菌 b 的粘附率较低。只有薄膜允许穿透,但被屏障阻挡。与放线菌 b(p = 0.009)相比,DT 组允许更多的变异棒状杆菌穿透,与变异棒状杆菌(p = 0.016)相比,放线菌 b 穿透 DS 膜的程度更高。与 DT 和 LP 相比,A. actinomycetemcomitans b 穿透 DS 的程度更高(两者的 p < 0.01)。与阻止两种细菌穿透的 LP 相比,DT 和 DS 允许更多的 S. mutans 穿透。结论该装置可使生物材料沉降并完全密封,从而实现标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信