The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Huimin Sun, Ying Wang, Huanle Cai, Pengyu Wang, Jie Jiang, Congxing Shi, Yongyue Wei, Yuantao Hao
{"title":"The development of a performance evaluation index system for Chinese Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: a Delphi consensus study.","authors":"Huimin Sun, Ying Wang, Huanle Cai, Pengyu Wang, Jie Jiang, Congxing Shi, Yongyue Wei, Yuantao Hao","doi":"10.1186/s41256-024-00367-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The performance evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is crucial for enhancing the quality of public health services. With the ongoing reform of the CDC system in China, the existing performance evaluation system faces challenges. This study used the Delphi method to develop a new performance evaluation system for China's provincial, city, and county-level CDC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the \"Structure-Process-Outcome\" model, assessment indicators were systematically collected. Indicators were modified and screened through two Delphi rounds based on CDC responsibilities, health development, and national policies. Twenty-four experts provided ratings and recommendations, and the research team evaluated questionnaire reliability, expert positivity, expert authority, and opinion consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The preliminary index system identified through the literature review and pre-survey included 11 primary, 30 secondary, and 64 tertiary indicators. After the first round of consultation, two secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and 22 tertiary indicators were added. After the second round of consultation, three secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and three tertiary indicators were added, at which point the p-value of the test for Kendall's coefficient of concordance W was < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation was within acceptable limits (< 0.25), so the consultation was concluded. The final index system included 11 primary, 25 secondary, and 67 tertiary indicators.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study responded to the CDC system reform by developing a comprehensive performance evaluation index system for provincial, city, and county-level CDC in China. The index system is both scientifically grounded and practical, serving as an effective tool for promoting the high-quality work of CDC organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":52405,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Research and Policy","volume":"9 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265441/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Research and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41256-024-00367-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The performance evaluation of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is crucial for enhancing the quality of public health services. With the ongoing reform of the CDC system in China, the existing performance evaluation system faces challenges. This study used the Delphi method to develop a new performance evaluation system for China's provincial, city, and county-level CDC.

Methods: Following the "Structure-Process-Outcome" model, assessment indicators were systematically collected. Indicators were modified and screened through two Delphi rounds based on CDC responsibilities, health development, and national policies. Twenty-four experts provided ratings and recommendations, and the research team evaluated questionnaire reliability, expert positivity, expert authority, and opinion consistency.

Results: The preliminary index system identified through the literature review and pre-survey included 11 primary, 30 secondary, and 64 tertiary indicators. After the first round of consultation, two secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and 22 tertiary indicators were added. After the second round of consultation, three secondary indicators and 11 tertiary indicators were removed and three tertiary indicators were added, at which point the p-value of the test for Kendall's coefficient of concordance W was < 0.001 and the coefficient of variation was within acceptable limits (< 0.25), so the consultation was concluded. The final index system included 11 primary, 25 secondary, and 67 tertiary indicators.

Conclusions: This study responded to the CDC system reform by developing a comprehensive performance evaluation index system for provincial, city, and county-level CDC in China. The index system is both scientifically grounded and practical, serving as an effective tool for promoting the high-quality work of CDC organizations.

中国疾病预防控制中心绩效评估指标体系的开发:德尔菲共识研究。
背景:疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的绩效评估对于提高公共卫生服务质量至关重要。随着中国 CDC 体制改革的不断深入,现有的绩效评估体系面临着挑战。本研究采用德尔菲法为中国省、市、县三级疾控中心制定了新的绩效评价体系:方法:按照 "结构-过程-结果 "模型,系统地收集评估指标。根据疾病预防控制中心的职责、卫生发展状况和国家政策,通过两轮德尔菲法对指标进行了修改和筛选。24 位专家提供了评分和建议,研究小组对问卷的可靠性、专家的积极性、专家的权威性和意见的一致性进行了评估:通过文献综述和预调查初步确定的指标体系包括 11 个一级指标、30 个二级指标和 64 个三级指标。经过第一轮咨询,删除了 2 个二级指标和 11 个三级指标,增加了 22 个三级指标。第二轮征求意见后,删除了 3 个二级指标和 11 个三级指标,增加了 3 个三级指标,此时 Kendall 协整系数 W 检验的 p 值为 结论:本研究顺应疾控体制改革,制定了中国省、市、县三级疾控中心综合绩效评价指标体系。该指标体系既有科学依据,又切合实际,是促进疾控机构高质量开展工作的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Health Research and Policy
Global Health Research and Policy Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
1.10%
发文量
43
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Health Research and Policy, an open-access, multidisciplinary journal, publishes research on various aspects of global health, addressing topics like health equity, health systems and policy, social determinants of health, disease burden, population health, and other urgent global health issues. It serves as a forum for high-quality research focused on regional and global health improvement, emphasizing solutions for health equity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信