Inspirational Professional Practice Model Redesign Using Shared Decision-Making.

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING
Melissa S Proffitt, Teresa E Bilyeu, Courtney R Doyle, James L Hermansen-Parker, Mary M Morin, Joanne Williams-Reed, Susan A Winslow
{"title":"Inspirational Professional Practice Model Redesign Using Shared Decision-Making.","authors":"Melissa S Proffitt, Teresa E Bilyeu, Courtney R Doyle, James L Hermansen-Parker, Mary M Morin, Joanne Williams-Reed, Susan A Winslow","doi":"10.1097/NND.0000000000001066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An integrated health system including 12 hospitals, an expansive network of ambulatory settings, and health insurance plans began a systematic review of the existing nursing professional practice model (PPM) created in 2007 to assess current relevancy. The goal was to determine PPM concepts and imagery that represent present-day nursing workforce. This article shares how a formal review of literature, utilization of focus groups, and system-wide shared decision-making influenced creation and evaluation of a revised PPM.</p>","PeriodicalId":51695,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Nurses in Professional Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Nurses in Professional Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000001066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An integrated health system including 12 hospitals, an expansive network of ambulatory settings, and health insurance plans began a systematic review of the existing nursing professional practice model (PPM) created in 2007 to assess current relevancy. The goal was to determine PPM concepts and imagery that represent present-day nursing workforce. This article shares how a formal review of literature, utilization of focus groups, and system-wide shared decision-making influenced creation and evaluation of a revised PPM.

利用共同决策重新设计鼓舞人心的专业实践模式。
一个综合医疗系统包括 12 家医院、一个庞大的门诊网络和医疗保险计划,该系统开始对 2007 年创建的现有护理专业实践模型(PPM)进行系统性审查,以评估当前的相关性。目的是确定能代表当今护理人员队伍的 PPM 概念和图像。本文介绍了正式的文献回顾、焦点小组的使用以及全系统共同决策如何影响了经修订的 PPM 的创建和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
255
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信