The quality of Web-based orthodontic information: A scoping review

IF 2.7 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.018

{"title":"The quality of Web-based orthodontic information: A scoping review","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2024.05.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Patients seeking health information on the Internet is commonplace. This scoping review aimed to collate and synthesize the evidence regarding the quality of Web-based orthodontic information.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search and independent screening process was conducted by 2 independent reviewers across 4 databases. The review was conducted in alignment with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 661 records identified, 30 publications satisfied the inclusion criteria. Reviewed studies included those related to the information contained within Web sites regarding dental and orthodontist practices, orthodontic interventions, appliances and auxiliaries, orthodontic conditions commonly requiring orthodontic therapy, issues related to patient experience, and advice during orthodontic treatment. A total of 5 quality of information (QOI) instruments and 3 readability tools were employed, with the University of Oxford, United Kingdom (DISCERN) instrument and the Flesch Reading Ease Score tool being the most frequently used. Most studies determined that the QOI contained within evaluated Web sites was poor and provided suboptimal information related to treatment risks and Web site reliability. Most studies indicated that the information was more difficult to read than recommended by guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The QOI of orthodontic information available on Web sites was low to moderate, with the readability of content at a level that was considered challenging for many readers to understand. A recommendation for greater involvement of the dental and orthodontic specialty in Web site development was commonplace. Research is required for the development of validated tools that can determine the accuracy of information in addition to Web site reliability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0889540624002312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients seeking health information on the Internet is commonplace. This scoping review aimed to collate and synthesize the evidence regarding the quality of Web-based orthodontic information.

Methods

A systematic search and independent screening process was conducted by 2 independent reviewers across 4 databases. The review was conducted in alignment with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines.

Results

Of 661 records identified, 30 publications satisfied the inclusion criteria. Reviewed studies included those related to the information contained within Web sites regarding dental and orthodontist practices, orthodontic interventions, appliances and auxiliaries, orthodontic conditions commonly requiring orthodontic therapy, issues related to patient experience, and advice during orthodontic treatment. A total of 5 quality of information (QOI) instruments and 3 readability tools were employed, with the University of Oxford, United Kingdom (DISCERN) instrument and the Flesch Reading Ease Score tool being the most frequently used. Most studies determined that the QOI contained within evaluated Web sites was poor and provided suboptimal information related to treatment risks and Web site reliability. Most studies indicated that the information was more difficult to read than recommended by guidelines.

Conclusions

The QOI of orthodontic information available on Web sites was low to moderate, with the readability of content at a level that was considered challenging for many readers to understand. A recommendation for greater involvement of the dental and orthodontic specialty in Web site development was commonplace. Research is required for the development of validated tools that can determine the accuracy of information in addition to Web site reliability.

查看原文本刊更多论文

网络正畸信息的质量：范围审查。

简介患者在互联网上寻求健康信息已是司空见惯。本范围综述旨在整理和归纳有关网络正畸信息质量的证据：方法：两名独立审查员对 4 个数据库进行了系统搜索和独立筛选。综述按照 PRISMA-ScR（系统综述和 Meta 分析的首选报告项目扩展范围综述）指南进行：在确定的 661 条记录中，有 30 篇出版物符合纳入标准。所审查的研究包括那些与网站中包含的信息相关的研究，这些信息涉及牙科和正畸医师的实践、正畸干预、矫治器和辅助工具、通常需要正畸治疗的正畸状况、与患者体验相关的问题以及正畸治疗期间的建议。共使用了 5 种信息质量（QOI）工具和 3 种可读性工具，其中最常用的是英国牛津大学（DISCERN）工具和 Flesch 阅读容易程度评分工具。大多数研究认为，受评网站的 QOI 不佳，提供的治疗风险和网站可靠性信息不尽人意。大多数研究表明，信息的阅读难度高于指南建议的难度：结论：网站上提供的正畸信息的QOI从低到中度不等，内容的可读性被认为对许多读者来说难以理解。人们普遍建议牙科和正畸专业更多地参与网站开发。除了网站的可靠性之外，还需要研究开发能够确定信息准确性的有效工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

4.80

自引率

13.30%

发文量

432

审稿时长

66 days

期刊介绍： Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.