Screening and early detection of post-extubation oropharyngeal dysphagia: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Paulo Carlos Garcia, Karina Sichieri, Tatiane Martins de Matos, Daniel Malissani Martins, Emília Cristina Peres, Milena Vaz Bonini, Diley Cardoso Franco Ortiz, Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz
{"title":"Screening and early detection of post-extubation oropharyngeal dysphagia: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Paulo Carlos Garcia, Karina Sichieri, Tatiane Martins de Matos, Daniel Malissani Martins, Emília Cristina Peres, Milena Vaz Bonini, Diley Cardoso Franco Ortiz, Vilanice Alves de Araújo Püschel, Diná de Almeida Lopes Monteiro da Cruz","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients undergoing intubation and mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit risk developing post-extubation oropharyngeal dysphagia (PED). PED can lead to aspiration complications, aspiration pneumonia, and prolonged hospitalization, as well as increased repeat intubation and in-hospital morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This evidence implementation project aimed to promote evidence-based screening and early detection of PED in an adult intensive care unit in a secondary public hospital in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The project followed the seven-phase JBI Evidence Implementation Framework to promote changes at the study site. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach were also used. The project was developed considering the main barriers to best practices, which were identified through a baseline audit. An educational program was designed to address the identified barriers. Two follow-up audits were then conducted to assess the changes in compliance with the evidence-based practices.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline audit showed deficits in current practices. The first follow-up audit indicated improved compliance with best practices, with five of the seven audit criteria showing 100% compliance. The second follow-up audit indicated that compliance remained at 100% for those five criteria and increased for the other two after an additional intervention to address poor results in nursing care documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The first follow-up audit showed good adherence to the educational program for the screening and detection of PED by nurses. The second follow-up audit, in line with the new strategies, showed improvement in nursing documentation.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A241.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000450","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients undergoing intubation and mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit risk developing post-extubation oropharyngeal dysphagia (PED). PED can lead to aspiration complications, aspiration pneumonia, and prolonged hospitalization, as well as increased repeat intubation and in-hospital morbidity and mortality.

Objective: This evidence implementation project aimed to promote evidence-based screening and early detection of PED in an adult intensive care unit in a secondary public hospital in Brazil.

Method: The project followed the seven-phase JBI Evidence Implementation Framework to promote changes at the study site. The JBI Practical Application of Clinical Evidence System (PACES) and Getting Research into Practice (GRiP) approach were also used. The project was developed considering the main barriers to best practices, which were identified through a baseline audit. An educational program was designed to address the identified barriers. Two follow-up audits were then conducted to assess the changes in compliance with the evidence-based practices.

Results: The baseline audit showed deficits in current practices. The first follow-up audit indicated improved compliance with best practices, with five of the seven audit criteria showing 100% compliance. The second follow-up audit indicated that compliance remained at 100% for those five criteria and increased for the other two after an additional intervention to address poor results in nursing care documentation.

Conclusion: The first follow-up audit showed good adherence to the educational program for the screening and detection of PED by nurses. The second follow-up audit, in line with the new strategies, showed improvement in nursing documentation.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A241.

拔管后口咽吞咽困难的筛查和早期检测:最佳实践实施项目。
简介:在重症监护病房接受插管和机械通气的患者有可能出现拔管后口咽吞咽困难(PED)。PED 可导致吸入并发症、吸入性肺炎和住院时间延长,并增加重复插管、院内发病率和死亡率:该循证实施项目旨在巴西一家二级公立医院的成人重症监护病房推广循证筛查和早期发现 PED:方法:该项目遵循JBI证据实施框架的七个阶段,以促进研究地点的变革。此外,还采用了JBI临床证据实际应用系统(PACES)和将研究付诸实践(GRiP)的方法。项目的制定考虑到了最佳实践的主要障碍,这些障碍是通过基线审计确定的。针对发现的障碍设计了一项教育计划。随后进行了两次后续审计,以评估在遵守循证做法方面的变化:结果:基线审计显示了当前实践中的不足。第一次跟踪审计表明,对最佳做法的遵守情况有所改善,七项审计标准中有五项达到了 100%。第二次跟踪审计表明,这五项标准的达标率仍为 100%,另外两项标准的达标率在采取额外干预措施以解决护理文件记录效果不佳的问题后有所提高:第一次跟踪审计表明,护士对筛查和检测 PED 的教育计划的遵守情况良好。西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A241。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信