Clinical evolution of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease during the COVID-19 pandemic (the COVID-PAD study).

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Giacomo Buso, Stefano Lanzi, André Berchtold, Sébastien Deglise, Adriano Alatri, Luca Calanca, Lucia Mazzolai
{"title":"Clinical evolution of patients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease during the COVID-19 pandemic (the COVID-PAD study).","authors":"Giacomo Buso, Stefano Lanzi, André Berchtold, Sébastien Deglise, Adriano Alatri, Luca Calanca, Lucia Mazzolai","doi":"10.1024/0301-1526/a001139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b></b> <i>Background:</i> The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant disruptions in chronic disease care and forced people to stay at home. The effects of such issues on outpatients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) remain unknown. <i>Patients and methods:</i> Single-centre, retrospective-prospective study conducted in a Swiss University Hospital. Patients with PAD were included between May 1 and July 31, 2020, with a follow-up visit at 12 months. Upon both visits, the Leriche-Fontaine PAD stage was recorded, and study participants underwent ankle-brachial index (ABI) calculation to assess limb perfusion. Functional capacities were assessed through the 6-minute walking and treadmill tests. Major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) and limb events (MALE) were recorded. Data collected during the pandemic were compared with the pre-pandemic period (January 1, 2019-April 30, 2020). <i>Results:</i> Overall, 259 patients were included. Mean age was 69 years and male sex was prevalent (69.1%). Odds of experiencing a degradation in PAD stage were lower during the pandemic than before (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.87; p = 0.018). No significant difference was found between periods in terms of ABI trends. Both pain-free walking time at treadmill test (p = 0.003) and maximal pain intensity at 6-minute walking test (p = 0.001) significantly improved during the pandemic. Compared with the pre-pandemic period, during the pandemic patients were hospitalized less frequently (p = 0.028) and were less likely to undergo elective limb revascularization (p<0.001). No significant difference was found between periods in terms of MALE (p = 0.311), whereas non-fatal strokes were less frequently reported during the pandemic (p = 0.043). <i>Conclusion:</i> In a cohort of outpatients with PAD, we found no evidence of clinical deterioration during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period, though rates of adverse events were nonnegligible in both periods. In case of future pandemics, patients with PAD should be encouraged to maintain an active lifestyle while being closely monitored to avoid clinical worsening.</p>","PeriodicalId":23528,"journal":{"name":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vasa-european Journal of Vascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001139","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to significant disruptions in chronic disease care and forced people to stay at home. The effects of such issues on outpatients with lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) remain unknown. Patients and methods: Single-centre, retrospective-prospective study conducted in a Swiss University Hospital. Patients with PAD were included between May 1 and July 31, 2020, with a follow-up visit at 12 months. Upon both visits, the Leriche-Fontaine PAD stage was recorded, and study participants underwent ankle-brachial index (ABI) calculation to assess limb perfusion. Functional capacities were assessed through the 6-minute walking and treadmill tests. Major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) and limb events (MALE) were recorded. Data collected during the pandemic were compared with the pre-pandemic period (January 1, 2019-April 30, 2020). Results: Overall, 259 patients were included. Mean age was 69 years and male sex was prevalent (69.1%). Odds of experiencing a degradation in PAD stage were lower during the pandemic than before (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.21-0.87; p = 0.018). No significant difference was found between periods in terms of ABI trends. Both pain-free walking time at treadmill test (p = 0.003) and maximal pain intensity at 6-minute walking test (p = 0.001) significantly improved during the pandemic. Compared with the pre-pandemic period, during the pandemic patients were hospitalized less frequently (p = 0.028) and were less likely to undergo elective limb revascularization (p<0.001). No significant difference was found between periods in terms of MALE (p = 0.311), whereas non-fatal strokes were less frequently reported during the pandemic (p = 0.043). Conclusion: In a cohort of outpatients with PAD, we found no evidence of clinical deterioration during the pandemic compared with the pre-pandemic period, though rates of adverse events were nonnegligible in both periods. In case of future pandemics, patients with PAD should be encouraged to maintain an active lifestyle while being closely monitored to avoid clinical worsening.

COVID-19 大流行期间下肢外周动脉疾病患者的临床演变(COVID-PAD 研究)。
背景:COVID-19 大流行导致慢性病护理受到严重干扰,人们不得不呆在家里。这些问题对下肢外周动脉疾病(PAD)门诊患者的影响尚不清楚。患者和方法:在瑞士一所大学医院进行的单中心回顾性研究。研究纳入了 2020 年 5 月 1 日至 7 月 31 日期间的 PAD 患者,并进行了 12 个月的随访。在两次就诊时,研究人员都记录了莱里什-方丹 PAD 分期,并进行了踝肱指数(ABI)计算,以评估肢体灌注情况。功能能力通过 6 分钟步行和跑步机测试进行评估。记录了主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和肢体事件(MALE)。将大流行期间收集的数据与大流行前(2019 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 4 月 30 日)的数据进行比较。结果:共纳入 259 名患者。平均年龄为 69 岁,男性占多数(69.1%)。在大流行期间,PAD 阶段退化的几率低于大流行之前(几率比 [OR]:0.43;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.21-0.87;P = 0.018)。不同时期的 ABI 变化趋势无明显差异。大流行期间,跑步机测试的无痛行走时间(p = 0.003)和 6 分钟行走测试的最大疼痛强度(p = 0.001)均有明显改善。与大流行前相比,大流行期间患者的住院次数减少了(p = 0.028),接受选择性肢体血管重建手术的可能性也降低了(p):在一组门诊 PAD 患者中,我们没有发现大流行期间与大流行前相比临床病情恶化的证据,尽管两个时期的不良事件发生率都不可忽略。在未来的大流行中,应鼓励 PAD 患者保持积极的生活方式,同时密切监测以避免临床症状恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
61
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Vasa is the European journal of vascular medicine. It is the official organ of the German, Swiss, and Slovenian Societies of Angiology. The journal publishes original research articles, case reports and reviews on vascular biology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, medical treatment and interventions for diseases of the arterial circulation, in the field of phlebology and lymphology including the microcirculation, except the cardiac circulation. Vasa combines basic science with clinical medicine making it relevant to all physicians interested in the whole vascular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信