Gender differences in participation one year after stroke: exploring biopsychosocial predictors for women and men.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Joris A de Graaf, Sanne van Miltenburg, Marieke J H Wermer, Marcel W M Post, Johanna M A Visser-Meily
{"title":"Gender differences in participation one year after stroke: exploring biopsychosocial predictors for women and men.","authors":"Joris A de Graaf, Sanne van Miltenburg, Marieke J H Wermer, Marcel W M Post, Johanna M A Visser-Meily","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2377518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Women appear to have a higher risk for long term restrictions in participation than men. This gender difference is poorly understood, as solely biomedical factors have been examined to date.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aims of this study are (1) to map gender differences in participation outcome one year after stroke, and (2) to identify demographic, stroke-related, or psychological predictors of participation for women and men separately.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 326 patients (mean age 66.5 ± 12.4y, 35.0% women) completed the restriction and satisfaction subscales of the Utrecht Scale of Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) at one year after stroke. Bivariate and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women reported worse scores for restrictions in participation compared to men (median 75.4 versus 87.9 respectively, <i>p</i> = 0.001), especially in physical activities such as daytrips and going out. Satisfaction with participation was similar between women and men. Worse cognitive functioning (β = 0.17) was associated with more restrictions in participation in men only, other predictors of restrictions in participation were similar between women and men. The presence of depressive symptoms (β = -0.49) was associated with worse satisfaction with participation in men, whereas an increased stroke severity (β = -0.29) and the presence of maladaptive psychological factors (β = -0.36) were associated with worse satisfaction with participation in women.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women experience more restrictions in participation compared to men one year after stroke. Taking into account gender-specific predictors of participation in stroke aftercare is important, as different biopsychosocial factors contribute to problems in participation across women and men.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2377518","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Women appear to have a higher risk for long term restrictions in participation than men. This gender difference is poorly understood, as solely biomedical factors have been examined to date.

Objectives: The aims of this study are (1) to map gender differences in participation outcome one year after stroke, and (2) to identify demographic, stroke-related, or psychological predictors of participation for women and men separately.

Methods: A total of 326 patients (mean age 66.5 ± 12.4y, 35.0% women) completed the restriction and satisfaction subscales of the Utrecht Scale of Evaluation of Rehabilitation-Participation (USER-P) at one year after stroke. Bivariate and multiple linear regression analyses were performed.

Results: Women reported worse scores for restrictions in participation compared to men (median 75.4 versus 87.9 respectively, p = 0.001), especially in physical activities such as daytrips and going out. Satisfaction with participation was similar between women and men. Worse cognitive functioning (β = 0.17) was associated with more restrictions in participation in men only, other predictors of restrictions in participation were similar between women and men. The presence of depressive symptoms (β = -0.49) was associated with worse satisfaction with participation in men, whereas an increased stroke severity (β = -0.29) and the presence of maladaptive psychological factors (β = -0.36) were associated with worse satisfaction with participation in women.

Conclusions: Women experience more restrictions in participation compared to men one year after stroke. Taking into account gender-specific predictors of participation in stroke aftercare is important, as different biopsychosocial factors contribute to problems in participation across women and men.

中风一年后参与活动的性别差异:探索女性和男性的生物心理社会预测因素。
背景:与男性相比,女性在长期参与方面受到限制的风险似乎更高。由于迄今为止仅对生物医学因素进行了研究,因此对这一性别差异的了解甚少:本研究的目的是:(1)绘制中风一年后参与活动结果的性别差异图;(2)分别确定女性和男性参与活动的人口学、中风相关或心理预测因素:共有 326 名患者(平均年龄为 66.5 ± 12.4 岁,35.0% 为女性)在中风一年后完成了乌得勒支康复参与评估量表(USER-P)的限制和满意度分量表。对结果进行了二元和多元线性回归分析:与男性相比,女性在参与限制方面的得分较低(中位数分别为 75.4 和 87.9,p = 0.001),尤其是在一日游和外出等体育活动方面。女性和男性对参与活动的满意度相似。认知功能较差(β = 0.17)仅与男性在参与活动方面受到更多限制有关,其他预测参与活动限制的因素在男女之间相似。抑郁症状的存在(β = -0.49)与男性参与满意度的降低有关,而中风严重程度的增加(β = -0.29)和适应不良心理因素的存在(β = -0.36)与女性参与满意度的降低有关:结论:与男性相比,女性在中风后一年的参与方面受到更多限制。结论:与男性相比,女性在中风后一年的参与方面受到更多的限制。考虑中风后参与护理的性别特异性预测因素非常重要,因为不同的生物心理社会因素会导致女性和男性在参与方面出现问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信