Clinical-Microbiological Study of Nontyphoidal Salmonella Infections from Karnataka, India.

IF 2.3 Q2 BIOLOGY
Scientifica Pub Date : 2024-07-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/6620871
Biranthabail Dhanashree, Shalini Shenoy
{"title":"Clinical-Microbiological Study of Nontyphoidal Salmonella Infections from Karnataka, India.","authors":"Biranthabail Dhanashree, Shalini Shenoy","doi":"10.1155/2024/6620871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nontyphoidal salmonella (NTS) are responsible for food-borne gastroenteritis and bacteremia, in immunosuppressed individuals. Antibiotic resistance in NTS is on the rise. This study reports the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of nontyphoidal salmonella in clinical samples. <i>Study Design</i>. This is a hospital record-based cross-sectional, retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our study, inpatient samples such as blood (<i>n</i> = 13546), urine (<i>n</i> = 11,333), pus (<i>n</i> = 1,010), and stool (<i>n</i> = 926) samples were cultured to isolate etiological agents in the microbiology department from January 2017 to June 2019. Relevant details such as duration of fever, platelet count, hemoglobin, WBC count, immune status, and mode of treatment were noted from the medical records. Data were analyzed, and continuous variables were expressed as mean and categorical variables as percentages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 NTS serovars were isolated, which included ten isolates from blood, five each from urine and pus, and four from stool samples. Of the NTS, five were <i>Salmonella enterica</i> subsp. enterica, three were <i>S.enterica</i> serovar Typhimurium, one was <i>S.enterica</i> subsp. diarizonae, and 15 <i>S.enterica</i> serovars could not be serologically differentiated. All were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cefuroxime. However, 16.6% of NTS was resistant to ceftriaxone, 4% to cotrimoxazole, 58% to ciprofloxacin, and 75% to nalidixic acid.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low prevalence of NTS responsible for invasive infections is seen in this part of the country. Few isolates were resistant to more than one antibiotic. A higher rate of resistance to ceftriaxone is the cause of concern. Awareness of the distribution of NTS serogroups is of epidemiological and public health significance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21726,"journal":{"name":"Scientifica","volume":"2024 ","pages":"6620871"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientifica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6620871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nontyphoidal salmonella (NTS) are responsible for food-borne gastroenteritis and bacteremia, in immunosuppressed individuals. Antibiotic resistance in NTS is on the rise. This study reports the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of nontyphoidal salmonella in clinical samples. Study Design. This is a hospital record-based cross-sectional, retrospective study.

Methods: In our study, inpatient samples such as blood (n = 13546), urine (n = 11,333), pus (n = 1,010), and stool (n = 926) samples were cultured to isolate etiological agents in the microbiology department from January 2017 to June 2019. Relevant details such as duration of fever, platelet count, hemoglobin, WBC count, immune status, and mode of treatment were noted from the medical records. Data were analyzed, and continuous variables were expressed as mean and categorical variables as percentages.

Results: A total of 24 NTS serovars were isolated, which included ten isolates from blood, five each from urine and pus, and four from stool samples. Of the NTS, five were Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica, three were S.enterica serovar Typhimurium, one was S.enterica subsp. diarizonae, and 15 S.enterica serovars could not be serologically differentiated. All were susceptible to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cefuroxime. However, 16.6% of NTS was resistant to ceftriaxone, 4% to cotrimoxazole, 58% to ciprofloxacin, and 75% to nalidixic acid.

Conclusions: A low prevalence of NTS responsible for invasive infections is seen in this part of the country. Few isolates were resistant to more than one antibiotic. A higher rate of resistance to ceftriaxone is the cause of concern. Awareness of the distribution of NTS serogroups is of epidemiological and public health significance.

印度卡纳塔克邦非伤寒沙门氏菌感染的临床微生物学研究
背景:非伤寒沙门氏菌(NTS)是造成免疫抑制人群食源性胃肠炎和菌血症的罪魁祸首。NTS 的抗生素耐药性呈上升趋势。本研究报告了临床样本中非伤寒沙门氏菌的流行率和抗菌药敏感性。研究设计。这是一项基于医院病历的横断面回顾性研究:在我们的研究中,2017 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月期间,微生物科对住院病人的血液(n = 13546)、尿液(n = 11333)、脓液(n = 1010)和粪便(n = 926)等样本进行了培养,以分离病原体。病历中记录了发热持续时间、血小板计数、血红蛋白、白细胞计数、免疫状态和治疗方式等相关细节。对数据进行分析,连续变量以平均值表示,分类变量以百分比表示:结果:共分离出 24 个 NTS 血清菌株,其中 10 个来自血液,5 个来自尿液和脓液,4 个来自粪便样本。在这些 NTS 中,5 个是肠炎沙门氏菌亚种,3 个是伤寒沙门氏菌血清,1 个是肠炎沙门氏菌亚种,15 个肠炎沙门氏菌血清无法从血清学上区分。所有细菌都对氨苄西林、氯霉素和头孢呋辛敏感。然而,16.6%的NTS对头孢曲松耐药,4%对复方新诺明耐药,58%对环丙沙星耐药,75%对纳利昔酸耐药:结论:该国这一地区导致侵袭性感染的 NTS 感染率较低。很少有分离菌株对一种以上的抗生素产生耐药性。令人担忧的是,头孢曲松的耐药率较高。了解 NTS 血清群的分布具有流行病学和公共卫生方面的重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientifica
Scientifica BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientifica is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research articles, review articles, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in the life sciences, environmental sciences, health sciences, and medicine. The journal is divided into the 65 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信