Assessing the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L among informal caregivers of people with dementia.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Valeriia Sokolova, Jan Faller, Siti Khadijah Binti Mohamad Asfia, Lidia Engel
{"title":"Assessing the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L among informal caregivers of people with dementia.","authors":"Valeriia Sokolova, Jan Faller, Siti Khadijah Binti Mohamad Asfia, Lidia Engel","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03737-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L in informal caregivers of people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from an online survey administered to informal caregivers of people with dementia in Australia. Known-group comparisons were examined by formulating 15 a priori hypotheses, where a difference was made between weak and strong hypotheses. Group comparisons were tested using the non-parametric Wilcoxon-rank and the Kruskal-Wallis test, as well as regression analysis. Floor and ceiling effects were considered to be present if more than 15% of respondents achieved the lowest or highest possible score, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 212 informal caregivers of people with dementia were included in the analysis. On average, participants were 47 years old (SD: 17) and 61% of them were female. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was 0.88 (SD: 0.16) and the mean EQ-VAS was 72.47 (SD: 17.86). While there was no floor effect, 26% reported full health. Nine strong and three weak hypotheses were confirmed, supporting the ability of the EQ-5D-5L to discriminate between groups with respect to: self-reported health status, happiness levels, presence of mental or physical health conditions, ability to engage in enjoyable activities, and availability of support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings provide supporting evidence for the EQ-5D-5L in terms of its discriminant validity in informal caregivers of patients with dementia. However, the present ceiling effect suggests that the sensitivity of the EQ-5D-5L to detect improvements may be limited. Further studies are warranted examining other psychometric criteria, including reliability and responsiveness to change.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03737-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to examine the psychometric performance of the EQ-5D-5L in informal caregivers of people with dementia.

Methods: Data were obtained from an online survey administered to informal caregivers of people with dementia in Australia. Known-group comparisons were examined by formulating 15 a priori hypotheses, where a difference was made between weak and strong hypotheses. Group comparisons were tested using the non-parametric Wilcoxon-rank and the Kruskal-Wallis test, as well as regression analysis. Floor and ceiling effects were considered to be present if more than 15% of respondents achieved the lowest or highest possible score, respectively.

Results: In total, 212 informal caregivers of people with dementia were included in the analysis. On average, participants were 47 years old (SD: 17) and 61% of them were female. The mean EQ-5D-5L utility score was 0.88 (SD: 0.16) and the mean EQ-VAS was 72.47 (SD: 17.86). While there was no floor effect, 26% reported full health. Nine strong and three weak hypotheses were confirmed, supporting the ability of the EQ-5D-5L to discriminate between groups with respect to: self-reported health status, happiness levels, presence of mental or physical health conditions, ability to engage in enjoyable activities, and availability of support.

Conclusion: Findings provide supporting evidence for the EQ-5D-5L in terms of its discriminant validity in informal caregivers of patients with dementia. However, the present ceiling effect suggests that the sensitivity of the EQ-5D-5L to detect improvements may be limited. Further studies are warranted examining other psychometric criteria, including reliability and responsiveness to change.

Abstract Image

评估 EQ-5D-5L 在痴呆症患者非正式照顾者中的心理测量性能。
目的:本研究旨在考察 EQ-5D-5L 在痴呆症患者非正式照护者中的心理测量性能:数据来源于对澳大利亚痴呆症患者非正规护理人员进行的在线调查。通过提出 15 个先验假设(弱假设和强假设之间存在差异)来检验已知组间的比较。使用非参数 Wilcoxon-rank 检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验以及回归分析对组间比较进行了检验。如果有超过 15%的受访者分别获得最低或最高分,则认为存在下限和上限效应:共有 212 名痴呆症患者的非正式照顾者参与了分析。参与者平均年龄为 47 岁(SD:17),61% 为女性。平均 EQ-5D-5L 实用性得分为 0.88(标准差:0.16),平均 EQ-VAS 为 72.47(标准差:17.86)。虽然没有下限效应,但有 26% 的人表示完全健康。九项强假设和三项弱假设得到了证实,支持了 EQ-5D-5L 在以下方面区分不同群体的能力:自我报告的健康状况、快乐程度、是否存在精神或身体健康问题、参与愉快活动的能力以及是否可获得支持:研究结果为 EQ-5D-5L 在痴呆症患者非正规护理者中的区分有效性提供了支持性证据。然而,目前的天花板效应表明,EQ-5D-5L 检测改善情况的灵敏度可能有限。还需要进一步研究其他心理测量标准,包括可靠性和对变化的反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信