Impact of lengthening velocity on the generation of eccentric force by slow-twitch muscle fibers in long stretches.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Sven Weidner, André Tomalka, Christian Rode, Tobias Siebert
{"title":"Impact of lengthening velocity on the generation of eccentric force by slow-twitch muscle fibers in long stretches.","authors":"Sven Weidner, André Tomalka, Christian Rode, Tobias Siebert","doi":"10.1007/s00424-024-02991-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>After an initial increase, isovelocity elongation of a muscle fiber can lead to diminishing (referred to as Give in the literature) and subsequently increasing force. How the stretch velocity affects this behavior in slow-twitch fibers remains largely unexplored. Here, we stretched fully activated individual rat soleus muscle fibers from 0.85 to 1.3 optimal fiber length at stretch velocities of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 maximum shortening velocity, v<sub>max</sub>, and compared the results with those of rat EDL fast-twitch fibers obtained in similar experimental conditions. In soleus muscle fibers, Give was 7%, 18%, and 44% of maximum isometric force for 0.01, 0.1, and 1 v<sub>max</sub>, respectively. As in EDL fibers, the force increased nearly linearly in the second half of the stretch, although the number of crossbridges decreased, and its slope increased with stretch velocity. Our findings are consistent with the concept of a forceful detachment and subsequent crossbridge reattachment in the stretch's first phase and a strong viscoelastic titin contribution to fiber force in the second phase of the stretch. Interestingly, we found interaction effects of stretch velocity and fiber type on force parameters in both stretch phases, hinting at fiber type-specific differences in crossbridge and titin contributions to eccentric force. Whether fiber type-specific combined XB and non-XB models can explain these effects or if they hint at some not fully understood properties of muscle contraction remains to be shown. These results may stimulate new optimization perspectives in sports training and provide a better understanding of structure-function relations of muscle proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":19954,"journal":{"name":"Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11381483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00424-024-02991-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After an initial increase, isovelocity elongation of a muscle fiber can lead to diminishing (referred to as Give in the literature) and subsequently increasing force. How the stretch velocity affects this behavior in slow-twitch fibers remains largely unexplored. Here, we stretched fully activated individual rat soleus muscle fibers from 0.85 to 1.3 optimal fiber length at stretch velocities of 0.01, 0.1, and 1 maximum shortening velocity, vmax, and compared the results with those of rat EDL fast-twitch fibers obtained in similar experimental conditions. In soleus muscle fibers, Give was 7%, 18%, and 44% of maximum isometric force for 0.01, 0.1, and 1 vmax, respectively. As in EDL fibers, the force increased nearly linearly in the second half of the stretch, although the number of crossbridges decreased, and its slope increased with stretch velocity. Our findings are consistent with the concept of a forceful detachment and subsequent crossbridge reattachment in the stretch's first phase and a strong viscoelastic titin contribution to fiber force in the second phase of the stretch. Interestingly, we found interaction effects of stretch velocity and fiber type on force parameters in both stretch phases, hinting at fiber type-specific differences in crossbridge and titin contributions to eccentric force. Whether fiber type-specific combined XB and non-XB models can explain these effects or if they hint at some not fully understood properties of muscle contraction remains to be shown. These results may stimulate new optimization perspectives in sports training and provide a better understanding of structure-function relations of muscle proteins.

Abstract Image

拉伸速度对慢速肌纤维在长距离拉伸中产生偏心力的影响。
肌肉纤维的等速伸长在最初增加后,会导致力量减弱(文献中称为 "给力"),随后又会增加。拉伸速度如何影响慢速肌纤维的这种行为在很大程度上仍未得到研究。在这里,我们以 0.01、0.1 和 1 最大缩短速度 vmax 的拉伸速度,将完全激活的大鼠比目鱼肌纤维从 0.85 最佳纤维长度拉伸到 1.3 最佳纤维长度,并将结果与大鼠 EDL 快速肌纤维在类似实验条件下获得的结果进行了比较。在比目鱼肌纤维中,当最大缩短速度为 0.01、0.1 和 1 时,给力分别为最大等长力的 7%、18% 和 44%。与比目鱼肌纤维一样,虽然横桥数量减少,但在拉伸的后半段,肌力几乎呈线性增长,其斜率随拉伸速度而增加。我们的研究结果与以下概念一致:在拉伸的第一阶段,交桥发生强力分离并随后重新连接;在拉伸的第二阶段,粘弹性 titin 对纤维力的贡献很大。有趣的是,我们发现拉伸速度和纤维类型对两个拉伸阶段的力参数都有交互效应,这暗示了纤维类型在交桥和钛蛋白对偏心力的贡献方面存在特异性差异。纤维类型特异性的 XB 和非 XB 组合模型能否解释这些效应,或者它们是否暗示了肌肉收缩的某些尚未完全理解的特性,还有待进一步证明。这些结果可能会为运动训练带来新的优化视角,并使人们更好地理解肌肉蛋白的结构-功能关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.20%
发文量
121
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pflügers Archiv European Journal of Physiology publishes those results of original research that are seen as advancing the physiological sciences, especially those providing mechanistic insights into physiological functions at the molecular and cellular level, and clearly conveying a physiological message. Submissions are encouraged that deal with the evaluation of molecular and cellular mechanisms of disease, ideally resulting in translational research. Purely descriptive papers covering applied physiology or clinical papers will be excluded. Papers on methodological topics will be considered if they contribute to the development of novel tools for further investigation of (patho)physiological mechanisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信