Patient preferences for teleradiology services and remote image interpretation: An empirical study.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Turki M Alanzi, Nouf Alanzi, Wejdan M Arif, Alhanoof Alkhunaifer, Lamia Al Ghaseb, Yara Hamad Albadrani, Norah Hasoosah, Ruya Adel Abdullah, Batool Al Shullah
{"title":"Patient preferences for teleradiology services and remote image interpretation: An empirical study.","authors":"Turki M Alanzi, Nouf Alanzi, Wejdan M Arif, Alhanoof Alkhunaifer, Lamia Al Ghaseb, Yara Hamad Albadrani, Norah Hasoosah, Ruya Adel Abdullah, Batool Al Shullah","doi":"10.1177/02601060241264649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study purpose: </strong>This study aims to examine patient preferences for teleradiology services and remote image interpretation. In this context, this study aims to address the following research questions: (i) How do patients perceive teleradiology services, focusing specifically on comfort, quality of care and satisfaction, communication and information, and accessibility and ease of use; (ii) How do patient demographics (age, gender, urban vs. rural residence) influence the perceptions on teleradiology services?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey design is adopted in this study. The survey comprises five sections targeting demographic information, comfort, and preferences regarding remote image interpretation, perceived quality of care and satisfaction, communication and information clarity, and accessibility and technology aspects using five-point Likert scale ratings. A total of 406 patients (209 males and 197 females; 170 urban residents; 174 semi-urban residents, and 62 rural residents) using teleradiology services participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported high satisfaction with remote image interpretation (3.78 ± 1.19), quality of care (3.31 ± 1.19), understanding (3.84 ± 1.43), and user-friendliness (3.67 ± 1.29). Key issues were technical problems (3.81 ± 1.35), feedback difficulties (3.19 ± 1.58), privacy concerns (2.43 ± 1.46), and low awareness (2.37 ± 1.12). Urban participants scored significantly better in comfort, preferences, and communication than those from semi-urban and rural areas.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Teleradiology design and implementation should be optimized to align with patient preferences and enhance overall satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060241264649"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241264649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study purpose: This study aims to examine patient preferences for teleradiology services and remote image interpretation. In this context, this study aims to address the following research questions: (i) How do patients perceive teleradiology services, focusing specifically on comfort, quality of care and satisfaction, communication and information, and accessibility and ease of use; (ii) How do patient demographics (age, gender, urban vs. rural residence) influence the perceptions on teleradiology services?

Methods: A cross-sectional survey design is adopted in this study. The survey comprises five sections targeting demographic information, comfort, and preferences regarding remote image interpretation, perceived quality of care and satisfaction, communication and information clarity, and accessibility and technology aspects using five-point Likert scale ratings. A total of 406 patients (209 males and 197 females; 170 urban residents; 174 semi-urban residents, and 62 rural residents) using teleradiology services participated in the study.

Results: Participants reported high satisfaction with remote image interpretation (3.78 ± 1.19), quality of care (3.31 ± 1.19), understanding (3.84 ± 1.43), and user-friendliness (3.67 ± 1.29). Key issues were technical problems (3.81 ± 1.35), feedback difficulties (3.19 ± 1.58), privacy concerns (2.43 ± 1.46), and low awareness (2.37 ± 1.12). Urban participants scored significantly better in comfort, preferences, and communication than those from semi-urban and rural areas.

Conclusion: Teleradiology design and implementation should be optimized to align with patient preferences and enhance overall satisfaction.

患者对远程放射学服务和远程图像解读的偏好:实证研究。
研究目的:本研究旨在探讨患者对远程放射学服务和远程图像解读的偏好。在此背景下,本研究旨在解决以下研究问题:(i) 患者如何看待远程放射学服务,特别是在舒适度、医疗质量和满意度、沟通和信息以及可及性和易用性方面;(ii) 患者人口统计学特征(年龄、性别、城市与农村居住地)如何影响对远程放射学服务的看法?本研究采用横断面调查设计。调查包括五个部分,分别针对人口统计学信息、舒适度、对远程图像解读的偏好、感知到的医疗质量和满意度、沟通和信息清晰度、可及性和技术方面,采用李克特五点量表评分法。共有 406 名使用远程放射学服务的患者(男性 209 人,女性 197 人;城市居民 170 人,半城市居民 174 人,农村居民 62 人)参与了研究:参与者对远程图像解读(3.78 ± 1.19)、医疗质量(3.31 ± 1.19)、理解(3.84 ± 1.43)和用户友好性(3.67 ± 1.29)的满意度较高。关键问题是技术问题(3.81 ± 1.35)、反馈困难(3.19 ± 1.58)、隐私问题(2.43 ± 1.46)和认知度低(2.37 ± 1.12)。城市参与者在舒适度、偏好和沟通方面的得分明显高于半城市和农村地区的参与者:结论:远程放射学的设计和实施应根据患者的偏好进行优化,以提高整体满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信