[Evaluation of Viral Subgenomic RNAs and Antigen Presence in SARS-CoV-2 PCR Positive Cases].

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Kazım Batıhan Büyükzengin, Alper Akçalı, Sevil Alkan, Gökhan Akdur
{"title":"[Evaluation of Viral Subgenomic RNAs and Antigen Presence in SARS-CoV-2 PCR Positive Cases].","authors":"Kazım Batıhan Büyükzengin, Alper Akçalı, Sevil Alkan, Gökhan Akdur","doi":"10.5578/mb.20240037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigen test (AgT) are frequently used in the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Routine PCR tests that detect the virus genome cannot determine whether the virus is infectious or not. However, detection of subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) produced during the replication period may indicate active viral infection. Active virus detection can offer various health and economic benefits from isolation time to treatment. Antigen tests are also considered as indicators of infectiousness since they can detect viruses above a certain load amount. The aim of this study was to use two different subgenomic RNAs and antigen test instead of genomic RNA to examine the relationship with each other and the clinic in terms of infectiousness. Evaluating the antigen test together with subgenomic RNA as an indicator of infectiousness may show the importance of this test. SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive 109 naso/oropharyngeal swab samples stored at -80 °C were included in the study. In order to confirm the PCR positivity of these samples, E gene PCR was performed and AgT, and E and N sgRNA quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) detection was performed. Of the 109 SARSCoV-2 PCR positive samples, 83 (76.14%) had antigen test positivity, 88 (80.73%) had E gene sgRNA, 96 (88.07%) had N gene sgRNA and 97 (89%) had at least one sgRNA positivity.The antigen test was found positive in 77.3% of the samples in which at least one sgRNA was detected and in 66.7% of the negative samples and this difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.475). The difference between E sgRNA and AgT positivity was significant (p= 0.023). N sgRNA was positive in 98.9% of E sgRNA positive samples and 42.9% of the negative samples and this difference was statistically significant (p= 0.0001). The AgT positivity rate was found to be 98.15% (53/54) for cycle threshold (Ct) value ≤ 25, 57.14% (12/21) for Ct 25-30, and 52.94% (18/34) for Ct ≥ 30. The difference in antigen test positivity between E gRNA Ct value ≤ 25 and > 25, ≤ 29 and > 29, < 30 and ≥ 30 was statistically significant (p= 0.0001). Antigen test positivity appears to be associated with viral load and infectivity, as expected. In our study, it has been shown that sgRNAs and AgT which are indicators of infectiousness can be detected at least 10 days after the symptom period. Using these two tests together could detect infective individuals with higher accuracy and shorten the duration of hospital stay and isolation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18509,"journal":{"name":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","volume":"58 3","pages":"309-320"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mikrobiyoloji bulteni","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/mb.20240037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigen test (AgT) are frequently used in the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Routine PCR tests that detect the virus genome cannot determine whether the virus is infectious or not. However, detection of subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) produced during the replication period may indicate active viral infection. Active virus detection can offer various health and economic benefits from isolation time to treatment. Antigen tests are also considered as indicators of infectiousness since they can detect viruses above a certain load amount. The aim of this study was to use two different subgenomic RNAs and antigen test instead of genomic RNA to examine the relationship with each other and the clinic in terms of infectiousness. Evaluating the antigen test together with subgenomic RNA as an indicator of infectiousness may show the importance of this test. SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive 109 naso/oropharyngeal swab samples stored at -80 °C were included in the study. In order to confirm the PCR positivity of these samples, E gene PCR was performed and AgT, and E and N sgRNA quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) detection was performed. Of the 109 SARSCoV-2 PCR positive samples, 83 (76.14%) had antigen test positivity, 88 (80.73%) had E gene sgRNA, 96 (88.07%) had N gene sgRNA and 97 (89%) had at least one sgRNA positivity.The antigen test was found positive in 77.3% of the samples in which at least one sgRNA was detected and in 66.7% of the negative samples and this difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.475). The difference between E sgRNA and AgT positivity was significant (p= 0.023). N sgRNA was positive in 98.9% of E sgRNA positive samples and 42.9% of the negative samples and this difference was statistically significant (p= 0.0001). The AgT positivity rate was found to be 98.15% (53/54) for cycle threshold (Ct) value ≤ 25, 57.14% (12/21) for Ct 25-30, and 52.94% (18/34) for Ct ≥ 30. The difference in antigen test positivity between E gRNA Ct value ≤ 25 and > 25, ≤ 29 and > 29, < 30 and ≥ 30 was statistically significant (p= 0.0001). Antigen test positivity appears to be associated with viral load and infectivity, as expected. In our study, it has been shown that sgRNAs and AgT which are indicators of infectiousness can be detected at least 10 days after the symptom period. Using these two tests together could detect infective individuals with higher accuracy and shorten the duration of hospital stay and isolation.

[评估 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性病例的病毒亚基因组 RNA 和抗原存在情况]。
聚合酶链反应(PCR)和抗原检测(AgT)是诊断严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒-2(SARS-CoV-2)的常用方法。检测病毒基因组的常规 PCR 检测不能确定病毒是否具有传染性。然而,检测复制期间产生的亚基因组 RNA(sgRNA)可能表明病毒感染活跃。主动检测病毒可提供从隔离时间到治疗的各种健康和经济效益。抗原检测也被认为是传染性的指标,因为它们能检测出超过一定负荷量的病毒。本研究的目的是使用两种不同的亚基因组 RNA 和抗原检测来代替基因组 RNA,以研究它们之间的关系以及临床感染性。将抗原检测与亚基因组 RNA 一起作为传染性指标进行评估,可能会显示出该检测的重要性。本研究采集了在零下 80 摄氏度保存的 109 份 SARS-CoV-2 PCR 阳性鼻/咽拭子样本。为了确认这些样本的 PCR 阳性,进行了 E 基因 PCR 和 AgT 检测,以及 E 和 N sgRNA 实时反转录定量 PCR(RT-qPCR)检测。在 109 份 SARSCoV-2 PCR 阳性样本中,83 份(76.14%)抗原检测呈阳性,88 份(80.73%)E 基因 sgRNA 呈阳性,96 份(88.07%)N 基因 sgRNA 呈阳性,97 份(89%)至少有一个 sgRNA 呈阳性。E sgRNA 和 AgT 阳性之间的差异显著(p= 0.023)。98.9% 的 E sgRNA 阳性样本和 42.9% 的阴性样本中 N sgRNA 呈阳性,这一差异有统计学意义(p= 0.0001)。周期阈值(Ct)≤25 时,AgT 阳性率为 98.15%(53/54);Ct 25-30 时,AgT 阳性率为 57.14%(12/21);Ct ≥ 30 时,AgT 阳性率为 52.94%(18/34)。E gRNA Ct 值≤25 和>25、≤29 和>29、<30 和≥30 之间的抗原检测阳性率差异有统计学意义(p= 0.0001)。正如预期的那样,抗原检测阳性似乎与病毒载量和感染性有关。我们的研究表明,作为传染性指标的 sgRNAs 和 AgT 可在症状期后至少 10 天检测到。同时使用这两种检测方法可以更准确地检测出感染者,缩短住院时间和隔离时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni
Mikrobiyoloji bulteni 生物-微生物学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bulletin of Microbiology is the scientific official publication of Ankara Microbiology Society. It is published quarterly in January, April, July and October. The aim of Bulletin of Microbiology is to publish high quality scientific research articles on the subjects of medical and clinical microbiology. In addition, review articles, short communications and reports, case reports, editorials, letters to editor and other training-oriented scientific materials are also accepted. Publishing language is Turkish with a comprehensive English abstract. The editorial policy of the journal is based on independent, unbiased, and double-blinded peer-review. Specialists of medical and/or clinical microbiology, infectious disease and public health, and clinicians and researchers who are training and interesting with those subjects, are the target groups of Bulletin of Microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信