Angiotensin II-independent abnormal renal vascular reactivity during puromycin nephropathy.

Q3 Medicine
Luis Isaias Juncos, Akinwunmi Oluwaseun Adeoye, Fernando Luis Martin, Julio Pedro Juncos, Sandra Teresita Baigorria, Néstor Horacio García
{"title":"Angiotensin II-independent abnormal renal vascular reactivity during puromycin nephropathy.","authors":"Luis Isaias Juncos, Akinwunmi Oluwaseun Adeoye, Fernando Luis Martin, Julio Pedro Juncos, Sandra Teresita Baigorria, Néstor Horacio García","doi":"10.25122/jml-2023-0367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Experimental glomerulonephritis results in hypertension that is sensitive to salt. Nevertheless, salt retention alone cannot explain the increase in blood pressure. Angiotensin antagonistic therapy reduces hypertension caused by puromycin amino nucleosides (PAN). We investigated the hypothesis that PAN modifies renal vascular reactivity through processes dependent on angiotensin. Long-Evans rats were given an intraperitoneal injection of either puromycin (150 mg/kg) or saline (controls). Group 1 was fed a normal sodium diet (NSD, <i>n</i> = 9). Group 2 was given 30 mg/L of quinapril (Q) in addition to NSD (NSD + Q; <i>n</i> = 6). Group 3 received a high sodium diet (HSD, <i>n</i> = 7), and Group 4 received HSD + Q (<i>n</i> = 7). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), plasma creatinine, proteinuria, and sodium balance were monitored for 12 days. On day 15, renal vascular reactivity was assessed by administering increasing doses of angiotensin II, acetylcholine (ACh), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) directly into the renal artery. SBP progressively increased in all PAN groups. This increase in SBP was greater in the HSD groups and was not significantly altered by Q treatment. SBP increased by 22 ± 4% (NSD), 51 ± 5% (NSD + Q), 81 ± 10% (HSD), and 65 ± 8% (HSD + Q). The renal blood flow of PAN rats did not return to baseline despite their normal renal vasoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II. Additionally, they showed reduced renal vasodilator responses to SNP and Ach. The vasodilator responses to both vasodilators were surprisingly unaffected by the inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). Renal vasodilator responses to both endothelium-dependent and independent variables were reduced in early PAN-induced hypertension. We found that the angiotensin-mediated mechanism is not responsible for this altered renal vasoreactivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicine and Life","volume":"17 3","pages":"309-313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicine and Life","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25122/jml-2023-0367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Experimental glomerulonephritis results in hypertension that is sensitive to salt. Nevertheless, salt retention alone cannot explain the increase in blood pressure. Angiotensin antagonistic therapy reduces hypertension caused by puromycin amino nucleosides (PAN). We investigated the hypothesis that PAN modifies renal vascular reactivity through processes dependent on angiotensin. Long-Evans rats were given an intraperitoneal injection of either puromycin (150 mg/kg) or saline (controls). Group 1 was fed a normal sodium diet (NSD, n = 9). Group 2 was given 30 mg/L of quinapril (Q) in addition to NSD (NSD + Q; n = 6). Group 3 received a high sodium diet (HSD, n = 7), and Group 4 received HSD + Q (n = 7). Systolic blood pressure (SBP), plasma creatinine, proteinuria, and sodium balance were monitored for 12 days. On day 15, renal vascular reactivity was assessed by administering increasing doses of angiotensin II, acetylcholine (ACh), and sodium nitroprusside (SNP) directly into the renal artery. SBP progressively increased in all PAN groups. This increase in SBP was greater in the HSD groups and was not significantly altered by Q treatment. SBP increased by 22 ± 4% (NSD), 51 ± 5% (NSD + Q), 81 ± 10% (HSD), and 65 ± 8% (HSD + Q). The renal blood flow of PAN rats did not return to baseline despite their normal renal vasoconstrictor responses to angiotensin II. Additionally, they showed reduced renal vasodilator responses to SNP and Ach. The vasodilator responses to both vasodilators were surprisingly unaffected by the inhibition of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). Renal vasodilator responses to both endothelium-dependent and independent variables were reduced in early PAN-induced hypertension. We found that the angiotensin-mediated mechanism is not responsible for this altered renal vasoreactivity.

嘌呤霉素肾病时血管紧张素 II 依赖性肾血管反应异常
实验性肾小球肾炎会导致对盐敏感的高血压。然而,仅靠盐潴留并不能解释血压的升高。血管紧张素拮抗疗法可降低嘌呤霉素氨基核苷(PAN)引起的高血压。我们研究了 PAN 通过依赖血管紧张素的过程改变肾血管反应性的假设。给长伊万大鼠腹腔注射嘌呤霉素(150 毫克/千克)或生理盐水(对照组)。第 1 组喂食正常钠饮食(NSD,n = 9)。第 2 组在摄入 NSD(NSD + Q;n = 6)的同时摄入 30 毫克/升的喹那普利(Q)。第 3 组接受高钠饮食(HSD,n = 7),第 4 组接受 HSD + Q(n = 7)。连续 12 天监测收缩压 (SBP)、血浆肌酐、蛋白尿和钠平衡。第 15 天,通过向肾动脉直接注射递增剂量的血管紧张素 II、乙酰胆碱(ACh)和硝普钠(SNP)来评估肾血管反应性。所有 PAN 组的 SBP 都逐渐升高。HSD 组的 SBP 升高幅度更大,但 Q 处理对其影响不大。SBP 增加了 22 ± 4%(NSD)、51 ± 5%(NSD + Q)、81 ± 10%(HSD)和 65 ± 8%(HSD + Q)。尽管 PAN 大鼠对血管紧张素 II 有正常的肾血管收缩反应,但其肾血流量并未恢复到基线水平。此外,它们对 SNP 和 Ach 的肾血管扩张反应也有所减弱。对这两种血管扩张剂的血管扩张反应竟然不受血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制的影响。在 PAN 诱导的早期高血压中,肾血管对内皮依赖变量和独立变量的反应都有所降低。我们发现,血管紧张素介导的机制不是这种肾血管活性改变的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Medicine and Life
Journal of Medicine and Life Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicine and Life publishes peer-reviewed articles from various fields of medicine and life sciences, including original research, systematic reviews, special reports, case presentations, major medical breakthroughs and letters to the editor. The Journal focuses on current matters that lie at the intersection of biomedical science and clinical practice and strives to present this information to inform health care delivery and improve patient outcomes. Papers addressing topics such as neuroprotection, neurorehabilitation, neuroplasticity, and neuroregeneration are particularly encouraged, as part of the Journal''s continuous interest in neuroscience research. The Editorial Board of the Journal of Medicine and Life is open to consider manuscripts from all levels of research and areas of biological sciences, including fundamental, experimental or clinical research and matters of public health. As part of our pledge to promote an educational and community-building environment, our issues feature sections designated to informing our readers regarding exciting international congresses, teaching courses and relevant institutional-level events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信