Effects of voluntary exercise and electrical muscle stimulation on reaction time in the Go/No-Go task.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s00421-024-05562-8
Mizuki Sudo, Daisuke Kitajima, Yoko Takagi, Kodai Mochizuki, Mami Fujibayashi, Joseph T Costello, Soichi Ando
{"title":"Effects of voluntary exercise and electrical muscle stimulation on reaction time in the Go/No-Go task.","authors":"Mizuki Sudo, Daisuke Kitajima, Yoko Takagi, Kodai Mochizuki, Mami Fujibayashi, Joseph T Costello, Soichi Ando","doi":"10.1007/s00421-024-05562-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute exercise improves cognitive performance. However, it remains unclear what triggers cognitive improvement. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) facilitates the examination of physiological changes derived from peripheral muscle contraction during exercise. Thus, we compared the effects of EMS and voluntary exercise at low- or moderate-intensity on reaction time (RT) in a cognitive task to understand the contribution of central and peripheral physiological factors to RT improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four young, healthy male participants performed a Go/No-Go task before and after EMS/exercise. In the EMS condition, EMS was applied to the lower limb muscles. In the low-intensity exercise condition, the participants cycled an ergometer while maintaining their heart rate (HR) at the similar level during EMS. In the moderate-intensity exercise condition, exercise intensity corresponded to ratings of perceived exertion of 13/20. The natural log-transformed root mean square of successive differences between adjacent inter-beat (R-R) intervals (LnRMSSD), which predominantly reflects parasympathetic HR modulation, was calculated before and during EMS/exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RT improved following moderate-intensity exercise (p = 0.002, Cohen' d = 0.694), but not following EMS (p = 0.107, Cohen' d = 0.342) and low-intensity exercise (p = 0.076, Cohen' d = 0.380). Repeated measures correlation analysis revealed that RT was correlated with LnRMSSD (Rrm(23) = 0.599, p = 0.002) in the moderate-intensity exercise condition.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that the amount of central neural activity and exercise pressor reflex may be crucial for RT improvement. RT improvement following moderate-intensity exercise may, at least partly, be associated with enhanced sympathetic nervous system activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-024-05562-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute exercise improves cognitive performance. However, it remains unclear what triggers cognitive improvement. Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) facilitates the examination of physiological changes derived from peripheral muscle contraction during exercise. Thus, we compared the effects of EMS and voluntary exercise at low- or moderate-intensity on reaction time (RT) in a cognitive task to understand the contribution of central and peripheral physiological factors to RT improvement.

Methods: Twenty-four young, healthy male participants performed a Go/No-Go task before and after EMS/exercise. In the EMS condition, EMS was applied to the lower limb muscles. In the low-intensity exercise condition, the participants cycled an ergometer while maintaining their heart rate (HR) at the similar level during EMS. In the moderate-intensity exercise condition, exercise intensity corresponded to ratings of perceived exertion of 13/20. The natural log-transformed root mean square of successive differences between adjacent inter-beat (R-R) intervals (LnRMSSD), which predominantly reflects parasympathetic HR modulation, was calculated before and during EMS/exercise.

Results: RT improved following moderate-intensity exercise (p = 0.002, Cohen' d = 0.694), but not following EMS (p = 0.107, Cohen' d = 0.342) and low-intensity exercise (p = 0.076, Cohen' d = 0.380). Repeated measures correlation analysis revealed that RT was correlated with LnRMSSD (Rrm(23) = 0.599, p = 0.002) in the moderate-intensity exercise condition.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that the amount of central neural activity and exercise pressor reflex may be crucial for RT improvement. RT improvement following moderate-intensity exercise may, at least partly, be associated with enhanced sympathetic nervous system activity.

Abstract Image

自主运动和肌肉电刺激对 "去/不去 "任务反应时间的影响
导言急性运动可改善认知能力。然而,目前仍不清楚是什么引发了认知能力的提高。肌肉电刺激(EMS)有助于研究运动时外周肌肉收缩所产生的生理变化。因此,我们比较了 EMS 和低强度或中等强度的自主运动对认知任务中反应时间(RT)的影响,以了解中枢和外周生理因素对 RT 改善的贡献:24名年轻、健康的男性参与者在接受急救医疗服务/运动之前和之后完成了 "去/不去 "任务。在 EMS 条件下,EMS 作用于下肢肌肉。在低强度运动条件下,参与者骑着测力计,同时将心率(HR)保持在 EMS 期间的类似水平。在中等强度运动条件下,运动强度与13/20的感知用力值相对应。在 EMS/运动前和运动中,计算了相邻心跳间期(R-R)连续差值的自然对数转换均方根(LnRMSSD),它主要反映了副交感神经对心率的调节:中等强度运动后 RT 有所改善(p = 0.002,Cohen' d = 0.694),但 EMS(p = 0.107,Cohen' d = 0.342)和低强度运动(p = 0.076,Cohen' d = 0.380)后 RT 没有改善。重复测量相关分析显示,在中等强度运动条件下,RT 与 LnRMSSD 相关(Rrm(23) = 0.599,p = 0.002):这些研究结果表明,中枢神经活动量和运动加压反射可能是改善 RT 的关键。中等强度运动后 RT 的改善可能至少部分与交感神经系统活动的增强有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信