Nonoperative Management for Rectal Cancer.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Erqi L Pollom, Vipul R Sheth, Aaron J Dawes, Thomas Holden
{"title":"Nonoperative Management for Rectal Cancer.","authors":"Erqi L Pollom, Vipul R Sheth, Aaron J Dawes, Thomas Holden","doi":"10.1097/PPO.0000000000000727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The treatment paradigm for rectal cancer has been shifting toward de-escalated approaches to preserve patient quality of life. Historically, the standard treatment in the United States for locally advanced rectal cancer has standardly comprised preoperative chemoradiotherapy coupled with total mesorectal excision. Recent data challenge this \"one-size-fits-all\" strategy, supporting the possibility of omitting surgery for certain patients who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Consequently, patients and their physicians must navigate diverse neoadjuvant options, often in the context of pursuing organ preservation. Total neoadjuvant therapy, involving the administration of all chemotherapy and radiation before total mesorectal excision, is associated with the highest rates of clinical complete response. However, questions persist regarding the optimal sequencing of radiation and chemotherapy and the choice between short-course and long-course radiation. Additionally, meticulous response assessment and surveillance are critical for selecting patients for nonoperative management without compromising the excellent cure rates associated with trimodality therapy. As nonoperative management becomes increasingly recognized as a standard-of-care treatment option for patients with rectal cancer, ongoing research in patient selection and monitoring as well as patient-reported outcomes is critical to guide personalized rectal cancer management within a patient-centered framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":9655,"journal":{"name":"Cancer journal","volume":"30 4","pages":"238-244"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0000000000000727","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The treatment paradigm for rectal cancer has been shifting toward de-escalated approaches to preserve patient quality of life. Historically, the standard treatment in the United States for locally advanced rectal cancer has standardly comprised preoperative chemoradiotherapy coupled with total mesorectal excision. Recent data challenge this "one-size-fits-all" strategy, supporting the possibility of omitting surgery for certain patients who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. Consequently, patients and their physicians must navigate diverse neoadjuvant options, often in the context of pursuing organ preservation. Total neoadjuvant therapy, involving the administration of all chemotherapy and radiation before total mesorectal excision, is associated with the highest rates of clinical complete response. However, questions persist regarding the optimal sequencing of radiation and chemotherapy and the choice between short-course and long-course radiation. Additionally, meticulous response assessment and surveillance are critical for selecting patients for nonoperative management without compromising the excellent cure rates associated with trimodality therapy. As nonoperative management becomes increasingly recognized as a standard-of-care treatment option for patients with rectal cancer, ongoing research in patient selection and monitoring as well as patient-reported outcomes is critical to guide personalized rectal cancer management within a patient-centered framework.

直肠癌的非手术疗法
摘要:直肠癌的治疗模式一直在向降级方法转变,以保持患者的生活质量。一直以来,美国治疗局部晚期直肠癌的标准方法是术前化放疗和全直肠系膜切除术。最近的数据对这种 "一刀切 "的策略提出了挑战,支持某些对新辅助治疗有临床完全反应的患者可以不进行手术。因此,患者和他们的医生必须掌握多种新辅助治疗方案,通常还需要考虑器官的保留。新辅助治疗包括在进行全直肠系膜切除术前进行所有化疗和放疗,临床完全反应率最高。然而,关于放疗和化疗的最佳顺序以及短程放疗和长程放疗之间的选择问题依然存在。此外,细致的反应评估和监测对于选择患者进行非手术治疗而又不影响三联疗法的出色治愈率至关重要。随着越来越多的人认识到非手术治疗是直肠癌患者的标准治疗方案,对患者选择和监测以及患者报告结果的持续研究对于在以患者为中心的框架内指导个性化直肠癌治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer journal
Cancer journal 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The Cancer Journal: The Journal of Principles & Practice of Oncology provides an integrated view of modern oncology across all disciplines. The Journal publishes original research and reviews, and keeps readers current on content published in the book Cancer: Principles & Practice of Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信