Investigating the Causal Link between Rheumatoid Arthritis and Atrial Fibrillation in East Asian Populations: A Mendelian Randomization Approach.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Cardiology Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/3274074
Weijun Luo, Hui Yv, Xiao Yu, Xianjun Wu
{"title":"Investigating the Causal Link between Rheumatoid Arthritis and Atrial Fibrillation in East Asian Populations: A Mendelian Randomization Approach.","authors":"Weijun Luo, Hui Yv, Xiao Yu, Xianjun Wu","doi":"10.1155/2024/3274074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in observational studies, yet the causal relationship remains elusive. In this study, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the impact of RA on AF risk specifically in East Asian populations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on RA (<i>n</i> = 212,453) and AF (<i>n</i> = 36,792), we applied the following five MR methods: inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-RAPS, maximum likelihood, weighted median (WM), and Bayesian weighted Mendelian randomization (BWMR). We evaluated heterogeneity, sensitivity, and pleiotropy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five genetic instrumental variants for RA were identified. All MR methods consistently indicated a causal association between RA and AF (IVW: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.41, <i>p</i> < 0.03; MR-RAPS: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.42, <i>p</i> < 0.02; maximum likelihood: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39, <i>p</i> < 0.01; WM: OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.52, <i>p</i> < 0.03; and BWMR: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.42, <i>p</i> < 0.03). Sensitivity and pleiotropy analyses confirmed the robustness and validity of the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study establishes a causal link between RA and AF in East Asians. Our results underscore the need for in-depth mechanistic investigations to unravel the underlying pathways. Clinicians should consider AF risk in RA management, emphasizing collaborative care between rheumatologists and cardiologists. Moving forward, future research should explore therapeutic interventions and address the shared biological mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":9494,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"3274074"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262875/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/3274074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) in observational studies, yet the causal relationship remains elusive. In this study, we employed Mendelian randomization (MR) to investigate the impact of RA on AF risk specifically in East Asian populations.

Methods: Utilizing genome-wide association study (GWAS) data on RA (n = 212,453) and AF (n = 36,792), we applied the following five MR methods: inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR-RAPS, maximum likelihood, weighted median (WM), and Bayesian weighted Mendelian randomization (BWMR). We evaluated heterogeneity, sensitivity, and pleiotropy.

Results: Five genetic instrumental variants for RA were identified. All MR methods consistently indicated a causal association between RA and AF (IVW: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.01-1.41, p < 0.03; MR-RAPS: OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03-1.42, p < 0.02; maximum likelihood: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.04-1.39, p < 0.01; WM: OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.03-1.52, p < 0.03; and BWMR: OR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02-1.42, p < 0.03). Sensitivity and pleiotropy analyses confirmed the robustness and validity of the results.

Conclusions: This study establishes a causal link between RA and AF in East Asians. Our results underscore the need for in-depth mechanistic investigations to unravel the underlying pathways. Clinicians should consider AF risk in RA management, emphasizing collaborative care between rheumatologists and cardiologists. Moving forward, future research should explore therapeutic interventions and address the shared biological mechanisms.

调查东亚人群中类风湿性关节炎与心房颤动之间的因果关系:孟德尔随机方法。
背景:在观察性研究中,类风湿性关节炎(RA)与心房颤动(AF)有关,但其因果关系仍然难以捉摸。在本研究中,我们采用孟德尔随机法(MR)调查了类风湿性关节炎对心房颤动风险的影响,特别是在东亚人群中:利用 RA(n = 212,453 人)和房颤(n = 36,792 人)的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)数据,我们采用了以下五种 MR 方法:逆方差加权法(IVW)、MR-RAPS、最大似然法、加权中位法(WM)和贝叶斯加权孟德尔随机法(BWMR)。我们对异质性、敏感性和多义性进行了评估:结果:共鉴定出五种 RA 遗传工具变异。所有 MR 方法均一致表明 RA 与房颤之间存在因果关系(IVW:OR = 1.20,95% CI:1.01-1.41,p < 0.03;MR-RAPS:OR = 1.21,95% CI:1.01-1.41,p < 0.03):OR = 1.21,95% CI:1.03-1.42,p < 0.02;最大似然法:OR=1.20,95% CI:1.04-1.39,p<0.01;WM:OR=1.25,95% CI:1.03-1.52,p<0.03;BWMR:OR=1.20,95% CI:1.02-1.42,p<0.03)。敏感性和多向性分析证实了结果的稳健性和有效性:本研究证实了东亚人的 RA 与房颤之间存在因果关系。我们的研究结果表明,有必要进行深入的机理研究,以揭示其潜在的途径。临床医生在进行 RA 管理时应考虑心房颤动的风险,强调风湿免疫科医生和心脏科医生之间的合作护理。今后的研究应探索治疗干预措施,并解决共同的生物机制问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology Research and Practice
Cardiology Research and Practice Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies that focus on the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The journal welcomes submissions related to systemic hypertension, arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, valvular heart disease, vascular disease, congenital heart disease, and cardiomyopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信