Bitter taste of the tobacco industry interference in Brazil.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
André Salem Szklo, Adriana Carvalho, Mariana Coutinho Marques de Pinho, Mirian Carvalho de Souza, Neilane Bertoni, Andre Luiz Oliveira da Silva
{"title":"Bitter taste of the tobacco industry interference in Brazil.","authors":"André Salem Szklo, Adriana Carvalho, Mariana Coutinho Marques de Pinho, Mirian Carvalho de Souza, Neilane Bertoni, Andre Luiz Oliveira da Silva","doi":"10.1136/tc-2024-058690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although Brazil became the first country worldwide to ban the sale of all tobacco products with any additive that could alter their flavours and tastes in 2012, its implementation was effectively halted by tobacco industry lawsuits, including a constitutional challenge filed in the Federal Supreme Court in 2013. This study aimed at examining, for the first time in the country, the evolution over time of the new registrations of tobacco products with additives that would have been banned if not for the tobacco industry's interference ('counterfactual scenario').</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the newly available public database on the registration of tobacco products developed by the Health Regulatory Agency (from 2008 onwards). All types of tobacco products intended for the domestic market that contained 'banned additives in a counterfactual scenario' and were registered between January 1 and December 31 of each year were selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2012 and 2023, a total of 1112 new registrations of tobacco products with 'banned additives' were recorded. The spread of hookah tobacco registrations started in 2014, and by 2023, the cumulative incidence of registrations containing 'banned additives' was 641. Both manufactured cigarettes and hookah products reached their peaks in new registrations in 2020.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>After 12 years since the resolution intended to ban all additives that change the aroma and taste of tobacco products in Brazil, primarily to prevent smoking initiation, the tobacco industry's interference continues to successfully block its implementation. Countries facing similar challenges in tobacco control could consider generating comparable national data that might help expose the adverse impacts of tobacco industry interference on public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23145,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/tc-2024-058690","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although Brazil became the first country worldwide to ban the sale of all tobacco products with any additive that could alter their flavours and tastes in 2012, its implementation was effectively halted by tobacco industry lawsuits, including a constitutional challenge filed in the Federal Supreme Court in 2013. This study aimed at examining, for the first time in the country, the evolution over time of the new registrations of tobacco products with additives that would have been banned if not for the tobacco industry's interference ('counterfactual scenario').

Methods: We used the newly available public database on the registration of tobacco products developed by the Health Regulatory Agency (from 2008 onwards). All types of tobacco products intended for the domestic market that contained 'banned additives in a counterfactual scenario' and were registered between January 1 and December 31 of each year were selected.

Results: Between 2012 and 2023, a total of 1112 new registrations of tobacco products with 'banned additives' were recorded. The spread of hookah tobacco registrations started in 2014, and by 2023, the cumulative incidence of registrations containing 'banned additives' was 641. Both manufactured cigarettes and hookah products reached their peaks in new registrations in 2020.

Conclusions: After 12 years since the resolution intended to ban all additives that change the aroma and taste of tobacco products in Brazil, primarily to prevent smoking initiation, the tobacco industry's interference continues to successfully block its implementation. Countries facing similar challenges in tobacco control could consider generating comparable national data that might help expose the adverse impacts of tobacco industry interference on public health.

烟草业干预巴西的苦涩滋味。
目标:尽管巴西于 2012 年成为世界上第一个禁止销售含有任何可改变烟草味道和口味的添加剂的烟草产品的国家,但烟草业的诉讼(包括 2013 年向联邦最高法院提出的宪法挑战)有效地阻止了这一禁令的实施。本研究的目的是在国内首次研究含有添加剂的烟草制品新注册量随时间推移的变化情况,如果没有烟草业的干预,这些添加剂本应被禁止("反事实情景"):我们使用了卫生监管局新近开发的烟草制品注册公共数据库(自 2008 年起)。我们选取了在每年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间注册的、面向国内市场的、含有 "反事实情景下的禁用添加剂 "的各类烟草制品:结果:2012 年至 2023 年间,共记录了 1112 件含有 "禁用添加剂 "的烟草制品的新注册。水烟注册的扩散始于 2014 年,到 2023 年,含有 "违禁添加剂 "的注册累计发生率为 641 起。人造卷烟和水烟产品在 2020 年都达到了新注册的峰值:巴西通过决议禁止所有改变烟草制品香味和口感的添加剂,主要是为了防止吸烟者开始吸烟,但这项决议通过 12 年后,烟草行业的干预仍成功地阻止了决议的实施。在烟草控制方面面临类似挑战的国家可以考虑生成可比的国家数据,这可能有助于揭露烟草业的干预对公众健康的不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Control
Tobacco Control 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
26.90%
发文量
223
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Tobacco Control is an international peer-reviewed journal covering the nature and consequences of tobacco use worldwide; tobacco''s effects on population health, the economy, the environment, and society; efforts to prevent and control the global tobacco epidemic through population-level education and policy changes; the ethical dimensions of tobacco control policies; and the activities of the tobacco industry and its allies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信