A Qualitative Study to Understand the Barriers and Facilitators in Smoking Cessation Practices Among Oncology Health Care Practitioners in One Health System.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Kate Frazer, Nancy Bhardwaj, Patricia Fox, Ailsa Lyons, Shiraz Syed, Vikram Niranjan, Amanda McCann, Catherine Kelly, Sinead Brennan, Donal Brennan, James Geraghty, Michael P Keane, Patricia Fitzpatrick
{"title":"A Qualitative Study to Understand the Barriers and Facilitators in Smoking Cessation Practices Among Oncology Health Care Practitioners in One Health System.","authors":"Kate Frazer, Nancy Bhardwaj, Patricia Fox, Ailsa Lyons, Shiraz Syed, Vikram Niranjan, Amanda McCann, Catherine Kelly, Sinead Brennan, Donal Brennan, James Geraghty, Michael P Keane, Patricia Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1093/ntr/ntae185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite the benefits of quitting smoking for those who have cancer, including improved health outcomes and reduced therapeutic toxicities, it is unclear how many people are supported in quit attempts during this time. Variations in the availability and provision of smoking cessation (SC) services are reported, with little understanding of the challenges and solutions. This codesigned study aimed to understand the perspectives of health care professionals (HCPs) working in oncology settings to engage in SC practices and identify recommendations for developing a SC pathway.</p><p><strong>Aims and methods: </strong>This was a qualitative study. Eighteen HCPs participated in semi-structured interviews from July 2021 to May 2022. We used thematic analysis approaches to code data and present four themes and SC strategies at micro, meso, and organizational levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes are reported specifically: (1) timing and knowledge, (2) building a relationship, (3) frequent asking with infrequent action, and (4) removing the barriers and tailoring the system. While HCPs discuss SC, there are variations in documentation and when conversations occur. Primarily, HCPs value the time to build therapeutic relationships with patients and thus may limit SC discussions in preference to treatment in clinical interactions. The role of structural barriers, including prescriptive authority for nurses, hinders active SC processes, as it is the lack of continuity and embedding of services supported by a clinical champion for SC.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study suggests reevaluating the status quo in SC service, highlighting service gaps, and suggesting opportunities at organizational levels to reduce structural barriers.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Variations in SC services exist in designated cancer centers. The data from this study can be used to inform a real-time health systems approach for SC services in oncology settings. Developing tailored SC services and interventions that are patient-centered and informed by their experiences is required. The data in this study suggest developing specialist education and training to upskill HCPs for equitable engagement if we are to meet EU and Cancer Moonshot goals for cancer reduction.</p>","PeriodicalId":19241,"journal":{"name":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","volume":" ","pages":"199-207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nicotine & Tobacco Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntae185","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the benefits of quitting smoking for those who have cancer, including improved health outcomes and reduced therapeutic toxicities, it is unclear how many people are supported in quit attempts during this time. Variations in the availability and provision of smoking cessation (SC) services are reported, with little understanding of the challenges and solutions. This codesigned study aimed to understand the perspectives of health care professionals (HCPs) working in oncology settings to engage in SC practices and identify recommendations for developing a SC pathway.

Aims and methods: This was a qualitative study. Eighteen HCPs participated in semi-structured interviews from July 2021 to May 2022. We used thematic analysis approaches to code data and present four themes and SC strategies at micro, meso, and organizational levels.

Results: Four themes are reported specifically: (1) timing and knowledge, (2) building a relationship, (3) frequent asking with infrequent action, and (4) removing the barriers and tailoring the system. While HCPs discuss SC, there are variations in documentation and when conversations occur. Primarily, HCPs value the time to build therapeutic relationships with patients and thus may limit SC discussions in preference to treatment in clinical interactions. The role of structural barriers, including prescriptive authority for nurses, hinders active SC processes, as it is the lack of continuity and embedding of services supported by a clinical champion for SC.

Conclusions: The study suggests reevaluating the status quo in SC service, highlighting service gaps, and suggesting opportunities at organizational levels to reduce structural barriers.

Implications: Variations in SC services exist in designated cancer centers. The data from this study can be used to inform a real-time health systems approach for SC services in oncology settings. Developing tailored SC services and interventions that are patient-centered and informed by their experiences is required. The data in this study suggest developing specialist education and training to upskill HCPs for equitable engagement if we are to meet EU and Cancer Moonshot goals for cancer reduction.

一项定性研究,旨在了解一个医疗系统中肿瘤医护人员在戒烟实践中遇到的障碍和促进因素。
导言:尽管戒烟对癌症患者有益,包括改善健康状况和减少治疗毒性,但目前尚不清楚有多少人在戒烟期间得到了支持。据报道,戒烟(SC)服务的可用性和提供情况各不相同,但对其中的挑战和解决方案却知之甚少。这项共同设计的研究旨在了解在肿瘤科工作的医护专业人员(HCPs)参与戒烟实践的观点,并为制定戒烟路径提出建议:这是一项定性研究。18 名医护人员在 2021 年 7 月至 2022 年 5 月期间参加了半结构化访谈。我们采用主题分析方法对数据进行编码,并在微观、中观和组织层面提出四个新出现的主题和SC策略:结果:出现了四个具体的主题:1) 时机和知识;2) 建立关系;3) 频繁询问但不频繁行动;4) 消除障碍并量身定制系统。虽然保健医生会讨论 SC,但在记录和对话时间方面存在差异。主要原因是,医疗保健人员重视与患者建立治疗关系的时间,因此在临床互动中可能会限制对 SC 的讨论,而更倾向于治疗。结构性障碍(包括护士的指令权)阻碍了积极的 SC 流程,因为缺乏由 SC 临床支持者支持的连续性和嵌入式服务:本研究建议重新评估戒烟服务的现状,突出服务差距,并提出组织层面减少结构性障碍的机会:启示:指定癌症中心的戒烟服务存在差异。本研究的数据可用于为肿瘤环境中的戒烟服务提供实时健康系统方法。需要开发以患者为中心、以患者经验为基础的定制戒烟服务和干预措施。本研究的数据表明,如果我们要实现欧盟和 "月光计划 "的减癌目标,就必须开展专科教育和培训,以提高保健医生的技能,从而实现公平参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
Nicotine & Tobacco Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
268
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nicotine & Tobacco Research is one of the world''s few peer-reviewed journals devoted exclusively to the study of nicotine and tobacco. It aims to provide a forum for empirical findings, critical reviews, and conceptual papers on the many aspects of nicotine and tobacco, including research from the biobehavioral, neurobiological, molecular biologic, epidemiological, prevention, and treatment arenas. Along with manuscripts from each of the areas mentioned above, the editors encourage submissions that are integrative in nature and that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries. The journal is sponsored by the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT). It publishes twelve times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信