"There is a lot of shame that comes with this": A qualitative study of patient experiences of isolation, embarrassment, and stigma associated with overactive bladder.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Casey N Brodsky, Hannah M Sitto, Daniela Wittmann, Lauren P Wallner, Courtney Streur, Melissa DeJonckheere, John S Stoffel, Anne P Cameron, Aruna Sarma, James Q Clemens, Giulia M Ippolito
{"title":"\"There is a lot of shame that comes with this\": A qualitative study of patient experiences of isolation, embarrassment, and stigma associated with overactive bladder.","authors":"Casey N Brodsky, Hannah M Sitto, Daniela Wittmann, Lauren P Wallner, Courtney Streur, Melissa DeJonckheere, John S Stoffel, Anne P Cameron, Aruna Sarma, James Q Clemens, Giulia M Ippolito","doi":"10.1002/nau.25557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Beyond causing physical discomfort, overactive bladder (OAB) is distressing to patients across a variety of psychosocial domains. In this qualitative component of a larger mixed methods study, we explore patients' lived experience with OAB to understand how this condition impacts individuals on a personal and social level, as well as their experiences interacting with the health care system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 20 patients and 12 physicians completed a questionnaire and semi-structured interview. The interview guide, developed in an iterative fashion by the authors, included questions about treatment decision making as well as experiences living with or treating OAB; this manuscript focuses on the questions probing lived experiences and interactions between patients and physicians. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and inductively coded and analyzed according to the principles of interpretive description to develop themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of patient and physician interviews yielded five key themes: isolation due to OAB diagnosis, social stigma associated with noticeable OAB symptoms, embarrassment from interactions with the health care system, feeling invalidated and dismissed by physicians, and OAB patients as a \"vulnerable\" population with \"desperation\" for cure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>OAB causes patients marked distress beyond their physical symptoms; it causes feelings of isolation from friends and family and makes them feel embarrassed to discuss their condition with loved ones and physicians alike. Efforts to destigmatize OAB, validate patient experiences, and improve access to OAB care may help diminish the psychosocial burden of OAB.</p>","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Beyond causing physical discomfort, overactive bladder (OAB) is distressing to patients across a variety of psychosocial domains. In this qualitative component of a larger mixed methods study, we explore patients' lived experience with OAB to understand how this condition impacts individuals on a personal and social level, as well as their experiences interacting with the health care system.

Methods: A total of 20 patients and 12 physicians completed a questionnaire and semi-structured interview. The interview guide, developed in an iterative fashion by the authors, included questions about treatment decision making as well as experiences living with or treating OAB; this manuscript focuses on the questions probing lived experiences and interactions between patients and physicians. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and inductively coded and analyzed according to the principles of interpretive description to develop themes.

Results: Analysis of patient and physician interviews yielded five key themes: isolation due to OAB diagnosis, social stigma associated with noticeable OAB symptoms, embarrassment from interactions with the health care system, feeling invalidated and dismissed by physicians, and OAB patients as a "vulnerable" population with "desperation" for cure.

Conclusions: OAB causes patients marked distress beyond their physical symptoms; it causes feelings of isolation from friends and family and makes them feel embarrassed to discuss their condition with loved ones and physicians alike. Efforts to destigmatize OAB, validate patient experiences, and improve access to OAB care may help diminish the psychosocial burden of OAB.

"膀胱过度活动症让人羞愧难当":对膀胱过度活动症患者的孤独、尴尬和耻辱感的定性研究。
目的:除了引起身体不适外,膀胱过度活动症(OAB)还会在多个社会心理领域给患者造成困扰。在这项大型混合方法研究的定性研究中,我们探讨了膀胱过度活动症患者的生活经历,以了解这种疾病如何在个人和社会层面影响患者,以及他们与医疗保健系统互动的经历:共有 20 名患者和 12 名医生完成了问卷调查和半结构化访谈。访谈指南是由作者反复编写的,其中包括有关治疗决策的问题以及患有或治疗 OAB 的经历;本手稿重点探讨了有关生活经历以及患者与医生之间互动的问题。对访谈进行了记录、转录和归纳编码,并根据解释性描述的原则进行分析,以形成主题:对患者和医生访谈的分析得出了五个关键主题:因诊断出 OAB 而产生的孤独感、与明显的 OAB 症状相关的社会耻辱感、与医疗系统互动时产生的尴尬感、被医生视为无效和被解雇的感觉,以及 OAB 患者作为 "弱势 "人群对治愈的 "绝望":OAB 给患者带来的困扰远远超出了他们的身体症状;它使患者感到与朋友和家人隔离,并使他们在与亲人和医生讨论病情时感到尴尬。努力消除 OAB 的污名化、验证患者的经历并改善 OAB 护理的可及性,可能有助于减轻 OAB 的社会心理负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信