Microvascular Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: The Utility of the Modified Frailty Five-Item Index.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sammy Othman, Emma Robinson, Dev Kamdar, Lucio Pereira, Brett Miles, Armen Kasabian, Joseph A Ricci, Denis Knobel
{"title":"Microvascular Free-Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction: The Utility of the Modified Frailty Five-Item Index.","authors":"Sammy Othman, Emma Robinson, Dev Kamdar, Lucio Pereira, Brett Miles, Armen Kasabian, Joseph A Ricci, Denis Knobel","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Microvascular free tissue transfer is a common tool for the reconstruction of oncologic head and neck defects. Adequate preoperative assessment can aid in appropriate risk stratification and peri-operative optimization. The modified five-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a validated risk-assessment scale; however, its utility in head and neck free-flap reconstruction is unknown when compared with other common risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> A retrospective, single-institution chart review (2017-2020) was performed. Patient demographics, defect and repair characteristics, pre- and peri-operative factors, and flap outcomes were recorded. A high mFI-5 score was defined as greater than 2. The total score, as well as other patient factors, was correlated to postoperative flap complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> A total of 214 patients were deemed appropriate for conclusion. The mean age was 63.9 ± 12.8 years. There were an even number of males (52.8%) and females (47.2%). A fifth of subjects (20.8%) underwent preoperative radiotherapy. There were 21 cases (9.8%) of complete flap loss. A total of 34 patients (29.4%) experienced any postoperative complication related to flap outcomes. An elevated mFI-5 was significantly associated with a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (39.7 vs. 29.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.019) and total flap loss (16.7% vs. 6.6%, <i>p</i> < 0.033). Preoperative radiation was found to be associated with an increased complication rate (<i>p</i> < 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> The mFI-5 score may be a potentially significant tool in the risk stratification of patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstruction as opposed to commonly utilized risk factors. Preoperative radiotherapy is significantly associated with postoperative complications. Appropriate preoperative assessment may help tailor patient care preoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Microvascular free tissue transfer is a common tool for the reconstruction of oncologic head and neck defects. Adequate preoperative assessment can aid in appropriate risk stratification and peri-operative optimization. The modified five-item frailty index (mFI-5) is a validated risk-assessment scale; however, its utility in head and neck free-flap reconstruction is unknown when compared with other common risk factors.

Methods:  A retrospective, single-institution chart review (2017-2020) was performed. Patient demographics, defect and repair characteristics, pre- and peri-operative factors, and flap outcomes were recorded. A high mFI-5 score was defined as greater than 2. The total score, as well as other patient factors, was correlated to postoperative flap complications.

Results:  A total of 214 patients were deemed appropriate for conclusion. The mean age was 63.9 ± 12.8 years. There were an even number of males (52.8%) and females (47.2%). A fifth of subjects (20.8%) underwent preoperative radiotherapy. There were 21 cases (9.8%) of complete flap loss. A total of 34 patients (29.4%) experienced any postoperative complication related to flap outcomes. An elevated mFI-5 was significantly associated with a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (39.7 vs. 29.4%, p < 0.019) and total flap loss (16.7% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.033). Preoperative radiation was found to be associated with an increased complication rate (p < 0.003).

Conclusion:  The mFI-5 score may be a potentially significant tool in the risk stratification of patients undergoing head and neck free-flap reconstruction as opposed to commonly utilized risk factors. Preoperative radiotherapy is significantly associated with postoperative complications. Appropriate preoperative assessment may help tailor patient care preoperatively.

头颈部微血管游离瓣重建术:改良虚弱五项指数的实用性。
背景:微血管游离组织转移是重建头颈部肿瘤缺损的常用工具。充分的术前评估有助于进行适当的风险分层和围手术期优化。改良的五项虚弱指数(mFI-5)是一个经过验证的风险评估量表;然而,与其他常见风险因素相比,它在头颈部游离皮瓣重建中的效用尚不清楚:进行了一项单一机构的回顾性病历审查(2017-2020 年)。记录了患者的人口统计学特征、缺损和修复特征、术前和围手术期因素以及皮瓣结果。总分以及其他患者因素与术后皮瓣并发症相关:结果:共有 214 名患者被认为适合进行手术。平均年龄为 63.9 ± 12.8 岁。男性(52.8%)和女性(47.2%)各占一半。五分之一的受试者(20.8%)在术前接受了放射治疗。有21例(9.8%)皮瓣完全脱落。共有 34 例患者(29.4%)在术后出现了与皮瓣效果相关的并发症。mFI-5 的升高与较高的术后并发症总发生率明显相关(39.7% 对 29.4%,p p p 结论:与常用的风险因素相比,mFI-5评分可能是对头颈部游离皮瓣重建患者进行风险分层的重要工具。术前放疗与术后并发症密切相关。适当的术前评估有助于调整患者的术前护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信