Lasting Effects of Surgically Used Topical Vasodilators on DIEP Artery Vascular Function.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Jason S Kofoed, Fatma B Tuncer, Alvin C Kwok, Jayant P Agarwal, Bradley A Ruple, Marta Borrelli, J David Symons, Russell S Richardson, Ryan M Broxterman
{"title":"Lasting Effects of Surgically Used Topical Vasodilators on DIEP Artery Vascular Function.","authors":"Jason S Kofoed, Fatma B Tuncer, Alvin C Kwok, Jayant P Agarwal, Bradley A Ruple, Marta Borrelli, J David Symons, Russell S Richardson, Ryan M Broxterman","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1788326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Surgeons routinely apply papaverine, lidocaine, or verapamil to produce acute vasodilation and prevent vasospasms during microvascular surgeries. There is evidence that topical vasodilators may induce postoperative endothelial and smooth muscle dysfunction, which would present after the acute vasodilatory effects of the topical drugs wear off. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the lasting effects of papaverine, lidocaine, and verapamil on human deep inferior epigastric perforator artery vasodilatory function after the acute effects of the topical drugs had worn off.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> Deep inferior epigastric arterial samples were obtained from 12 patients during surgery. Each artery was dissected into four rings which where incubated for 1 minute in either physiological saline solution (control), papaverine (30 mg/mL), lidocaine (20 mg/mL), or verapamil (2.5 mg/mL), followed by a 2-hour washout. Endothelial-dependent and -independent vasorelaxation were then assessed by the isometric tension responses to acetylcholine or sodium nitroprusside, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Peak acetylcholine-evoked vasorelaxation (mean ± standard deviation) was not different between control (62 ± 23%) and lidocaine (57 ± 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.881), but was reduced (all <i>p</i> < 0.002) in papaverine (22 ± 27%) and verapamil (22 ± 20%). Peak sodium nitroprusside-evoked vasorelaxation was not different (all <i>p</i> > 0.692) among control (132 ± 35%), lidocaine (121 ± 22%), and verapamil (127 ± 22%), but was less in papaverine (104 ± 41%; <i>p</i> = 0.045) than control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Surgically used doses of papaverine and verapamil, but not lidocaine, have lasting negative effects on arterial vasodilatory function despite the acute effects of the drugs having worn off. These findings, in conjunction with the spasmolytic properties of each drug, may help guide the selection of an optimal topical vasodilator for use during microvascular surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":16949,"journal":{"name":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of reconstructive microsurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1788326","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Surgeons routinely apply papaverine, lidocaine, or verapamil to produce acute vasodilation and prevent vasospasms during microvascular surgeries. There is evidence that topical vasodilators may induce postoperative endothelial and smooth muscle dysfunction, which would present after the acute vasodilatory effects of the topical drugs wear off. Therefore, the purpose of the current study was to evaluate the lasting effects of papaverine, lidocaine, and verapamil on human deep inferior epigastric perforator artery vasodilatory function after the acute effects of the topical drugs had worn off.

Methods:  Deep inferior epigastric arterial samples were obtained from 12 patients during surgery. Each artery was dissected into four rings which where incubated for 1 minute in either physiological saline solution (control), papaverine (30 mg/mL), lidocaine (20 mg/mL), or verapamil (2.5 mg/mL), followed by a 2-hour washout. Endothelial-dependent and -independent vasorelaxation were then assessed by the isometric tension responses to acetylcholine or sodium nitroprusside, respectively.

Results:  Peak acetylcholine-evoked vasorelaxation (mean ± standard deviation) was not different between control (62 ± 23%) and lidocaine (57 ± 18%, p = 0.881), but was reduced (all p < 0.002) in papaverine (22 ± 27%) and verapamil (22 ± 20%). Peak sodium nitroprusside-evoked vasorelaxation was not different (all p > 0.692) among control (132 ± 35%), lidocaine (121 ± 22%), and verapamil (127 ± 22%), but was less in papaverine (104 ± 41%; p = 0.045) than control.

Conclusion:  Surgically used doses of papaverine and verapamil, but not lidocaine, have lasting negative effects on arterial vasodilatory function despite the acute effects of the drugs having worn off. These findings, in conjunction with the spasmolytic properties of each drug, may help guide the selection of an optimal topical vasodilator for use during microvascular surgeries.

手术外用血管扩张剂对 DIEP 动脉血管功能的持久影响。
背景:在微血管手术过程中,外科医生通常会使用帕帕维林、利多卡因或维拉帕米来产生急性血管扩张并防止血管痉挛。有证据表明,局部血管扩张剂可能会诱发术后内皮和平滑肌功能障碍,这将在局部药物的急性血管扩张作用消失后出现。因此,本研究的目的是评估在局部用药的急性作用消失后,木瓜碱、利多卡因和维拉帕米对人体下腹深穿孔动脉血管扩张功能的持久影响:方法:从 12 名手术患者身上采集了下腹深动脉样本。每条动脉被解剖成四个环,分别在生理盐水(对照组)、罂粟碱(30 毫克/毫升)、利多卡因(20 毫克/毫升)或维拉帕米(2.5 毫克/毫升)中浸泡 1 分钟,然后进行 2 小时的冲洗。然后分别通过等长张力对乙酰胆碱或硝普钠的反应评估内皮依赖性和依赖性血管舒张:结果:乙酰胆碱诱发的血管舒张峰值(平均值±标准偏差)在对照组(62±23%)和利多卡因(57±18%,p = 0.881)之间没有差异,但在对照组(132±35%)、利多卡因(121±22%)和维拉帕米(127±22%)之间有所降低(所有p p > 0.692),但在罂粟碱(104±41%;p = 0.045)中低于对照组:结论:使用手术剂量的帕帕维林和维拉帕米,而不是利多卡因,会对动脉血管扩张功能产生持久的负面影响,尽管药物的急性作用已经消失。这些发现与每种药物的解痉特性相结合,有助于指导微血管手术期间选择最佳的局部血管扩张剂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
28.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery is a peer-reviewed, indexed journal that provides an international forum for the publication of articles focusing on reconstructive microsurgery and complex reconstructive surgery. The journal was originally established in 1984 for the microsurgical community to publish and share academic papers. The Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery provides the latest in original research spanning basic laboratory, translational, and clinical investigations. Review papers cover current topics in complex reconstruction and microsurgery. In addition, special sections discuss new technologies, innovations, materials, and significant problem cases. The journal welcomes controversial topics, editorial comments, book reviews, and letters to the Editor, in order to complete the balanced spectrum of information available in the Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery. All articles undergo stringent peer review by international experts in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信