Disability and long-term breathlessness: a cross-sectional, population study.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Slavica Kochovska, Diana Ferreira, Sungwon Chang, Vanessa Brunelli, Deidre Morgan, Thomas Similowski, Miriam Johnson, Magnus Ekström, David Currow
{"title":"Disability and long-term breathlessness: a cross-sectional, population study.","authors":"Slavica Kochovska, Diana Ferreira, Sungwon Chang, Vanessa Brunelli, Deidre Morgan, Thomas Similowski, Miriam Johnson, Magnus Ekström, David Currow","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disability, resulting from altered interactions between individuals and their environment, is a worldwide issue causing inequities and suffering. Many diseases associated with breathlessness cause disability but the relationship between disability and the severity of breathlessness itself is unknown.This study evaluated associations between disability using the WHO's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 and levels of long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i>.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This population-based, cross-sectional online survey (n=10 033) reflected the most recent national census (2016) by age, sex, state/territory of residence and rurality. Assessments included self-reported disability (WHODAS 2.0 12-item (range 12 (no disability) to 60 (most severe disability)) assessed in 6 domains) and long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale; 0-4 (4-most severe)). Days in the last month affected by breathlessness were reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of respondents (52% women; mean age 45), mean total disability score was 20.9 (SD 9.5). 42% (n=4245) had mMRC >0 (mMRC1 31% (n=3139); mMRC2 8% (n=806); mMRC3,4 3% (n=300)). Every level of long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> was associated with greater levels of disability (total p <0.001; each domain p <0.001). The most compromised domains were <i>Mobility</i> and <i>Participation</i>.In the last 30 days, people with severe breathlessness (mMRC 3-4): experienced disability (20 days); reduced activities/work (10 days); and completely forwent activities (another 5 days).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability should be in the definition of persistent breathlessness as it is systematically associated with long-term <i>breathlessness limiting exertion</i> in a grade-dependent, multidimensional manner. Disability should be assessed in people with long-term breathlessness to optimise their social well-being and health.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Disability, resulting from altered interactions between individuals and their environment, is a worldwide issue causing inequities and suffering. Many diseases associated with breathlessness cause disability but the relationship between disability and the severity of breathlessness itself is unknown.This study evaluated associations between disability using the WHO's Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 and levels of long-term breathlessness limiting exertion.

Methods: This population-based, cross-sectional online survey (n=10 033) reflected the most recent national census (2016) by age, sex, state/territory of residence and rurality. Assessments included self-reported disability (WHODAS 2.0 12-item (range 12 (no disability) to 60 (most severe disability)) assessed in 6 domains) and long-term breathlessness limiting exertion (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) breathlessness scale; 0-4 (4-most severe)). Days in the last month affected by breathlessness were reported.

Results: Of respondents (52% women; mean age 45), mean total disability score was 20.9 (SD 9.5). 42% (n=4245) had mMRC >0 (mMRC1 31% (n=3139); mMRC2 8% (n=806); mMRC3,4 3% (n=300)). Every level of long-term breathlessness limiting exertion was associated with greater levels of disability (total p <0.001; each domain p <0.001). The most compromised domains were Mobility and Participation.In the last 30 days, people with severe breathlessness (mMRC 3-4): experienced disability (20 days); reduced activities/work (10 days); and completely forwent activities (another 5 days).

Conclusions: Disability should be in the definition of persistent breathlessness as it is systematically associated with long-term breathlessness limiting exertion in a grade-dependent, multidimensional manner. Disability should be assessed in people with long-term breathlessness to optimise their social well-being and health.

残疾与长期呼吸困难:一项横断面人口研究。
导言:个人与环境之间的互动改变所导致的残疾是一个世界性问题,它造成了不公平和痛苦。许多与憋气相关的疾病都会导致残疾,但残疾与憋气本身严重程度之间的关系尚不清楚。本研究使用世界卫生组织残疾评估表(WHODAS)2.0评估了残疾与限制用力的长期憋气程度之间的关系:这项以人口为基础的横断面在线调查(n=10 033)反映了最近一次全国人口普查(2016 年)的年龄、性别、居住州/地区和乡村情况。评估内容包括自我报告的残疾情况(WHODAS 2.0 12项(范围为12(无残疾)至60(最严重残疾)),从6个领域进行评估)和限制用力的长期呼吸困难(修改后的医学研究委员会(mMRC)呼吸困难量表;0-4(4-最严重))。受访者还报告了上个月受呼吸困难影响的天数:受访者(52% 为女性;平均年龄 45 岁)的平均残疾总分为 20.9 分(标准差 9.5 分)。42%(n=4245)的 mMRC>0(mMRC1 31%(n=3139);mMRC2 8%(n=806);mMRC3,4 3%(n=300))。在过去 30 天中,有严重呼吸困难(mMRC 3-4)的人:出现残疾(20 天);减少活动/工作(10 天);完全放弃活动(另外 5 天):残疾应被纳入持续性呼吸困难的定义中,因为残疾与限制用力的长期呼吸困难有系统性的联系,其程度取决于等级和多维度。应评估长期呼吸困难患者的残疾状况,以优化他们的社会福利和健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信