Previous Cesarean Section Delivery Increases the Risk for Seroma Development in Abdominoplasty Patients: Our Experience With 746 Patients.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ron Skorochod, Eran Hadad, Yoram Wolf
{"title":"Previous Cesarean Section Delivery Increases the Risk for Seroma Development in Abdominoplasty Patients: Our Experience With 746 Patients.","authors":"Ron Skorochod, Eran Hadad, Yoram Wolf","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjae164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complications after body-contouring surgery are a field of great interest. Recognition of patient-related characteristics contributing to a greater risk for complication is of the utmost importance in improving the quality of care and safety profile of aesthetic procedures. Previous history of cesarean section (CS) and its impact on adverse events after abdominoplasty has yet to be investigated and defined.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our objective was to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on the risk for adverse events in abdominoplasty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The medical records of 746 eligible patients were reviewed, and relevant information was extracted. Stratification of patients based on a previous history of CS was followed by statistical analysis of differences between the groups. Relevant regression models were implemented to further understand the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred forty-six patients were included in the study, of which 308 (43.1%) had history of CS delivery. The group did not differ in baseline demographic and surgical details, except for a greater hemoglobin level in the non-CS patients (P = .007). Analysis of complication rates revealed a statistically significant increase in the risk for seroma development in the group of patients with a history of CS delivery (P = .031), which correlated to a 65% increase in the risk for complications (odds ratio = 1.65, 95% CI 1.07-2.56).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A medical history of CS increases the risk for seroma development in the postoperative period following abdominoplasty. Several potential pathogenic mechanisms exist, and further prospective research is needed to further characterize the association.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"NP886-NP891"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjae164","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Complications after body-contouring surgery are a field of great interest. Recognition of patient-related characteristics contributing to a greater risk for complication is of the utmost importance in improving the quality of care and safety profile of aesthetic procedures. Previous history of cesarean section (CS) and its impact on adverse events after abdominoplasty has yet to be investigated and defined.

Objectives: Our objective was to evaluate the effect of previous cesarean section on the risk for adverse events in abdominoplasty.

Methods: The medical records of 746 eligible patients were reviewed, and relevant information was extracted. Stratification of patients based on a previous history of CS was followed by statistical analysis of differences between the groups. Relevant regression models were implemented to further understand the data.

Results: Seven hundred forty-six patients were included in the study, of which 308 (43.1%) had history of CS delivery. The group did not differ in baseline demographic and surgical details, except for a greater hemoglobin level in the non-CS patients (P = .007). Analysis of complication rates revealed a statistically significant increase in the risk for seroma development in the group of patients with a history of CS delivery (P = .031), which correlated to a 65% increase in the risk for complications (odds ratio = 1.65, 95% CI 1.07-2.56).

Conclusions: A medical history of CS increases the risk for seroma development in the postoperative period following abdominoplasty. Several potential pathogenic mechanisms exist, and further prospective research is needed to further characterize the association.

Level of evidence: 3:

剖腹产增加腹壁成形术患者出现血清肿的风险:我们对 746 例患者的经验。
背景:塑身手术后的并发症是一个备受关注的领域。识别导致并发症风险增加的患者相关特征对于提高医疗质量和美容手术的安全性至关重要。剖腹产史及其对腹部整形术后不良事件的影响还有待研究和界定:评估既往剖腹产史对腹部整形手术不良事件风险的影响:方法:对 746 名符合条件的患者的病历进行审查,并提取相关信息。根据既往剖宫产史对患者进行分层,然后对组间差异进行统计分析。采用相关回归模型进一步了解数据:研究共纳入了 746 名患者,其中 308 人(43.1%)有 CS 分娩史。除血红蛋白水平较高外(P 值= 0.007),各组在基线人口统计学和手术细节方面均无差异。对并发症发生率的分析发现,有 CS 分娩史的患者发生血清肿的风险在统计学上显著增加(P 值= 0.031),这与并发症风险增加 65% 有关(OR= 1.65,95% CI 1.07-2.56):结论:CS病史会增加腹壁成形术后血清肿发生的风险。结论:CS病史增加了腹壁成形术后血清肿发生的风险,存在几种潜在的致病机制,需要进一步的前瞻性研究来进一步确定这种关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信