INSURGENT CO-PRODUCTION: Conflict, Cooperation and the Dialectics of Scale in Thailand's Baan Mankong Program

IF 2.7 2区 经济学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Hayden Shelby
{"title":"INSURGENT CO-PRODUCTION: Conflict, Cooperation and the Dialectics of Scale in Thailand's Baan Mankong Program","authors":"Hayden Shelby","doi":"10.1111/1468-2427.13251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the role of insurgency in scaling up the co-production of housing. Co-production has gained in popularity in the past 15 years as both a set of practices and an intellectual framing for analyzing urbanization in the global South. Discussions of co-production have largely emphasized the cooperative nature of the approach, asserting that a mostly non-confrontational politics has proven effective at reshaping urban governance in ways that better meet the needs of the urban poor. However, recent analyses have identified conflict versus confrontation as a key tension in co-production, especially as co-productive programs seek to go to scale. I contribute to these discussions by analyzing a well-known case of large-scale co-production, Thailand's Baan Mankong program, to understand the roles of insurgent versus cooperative community networks in the program's trajectory. I conclude that a more insurgent network opens up new land, resources and avenues for political participation. A more cooperative network then renders many of these interventions broadly politically acceptable to those in power. The two networks thus exist in a dialectic that has enabled the program's scaling up. I argue that research into co-production should pay more attention to the importance of confrontational tactics by community networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":14327,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","volume":"48 4","pages":"666-688"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-2427.13251","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban and Regional Research","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-2427.13251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the role of insurgency in scaling up the co-production of housing. Co-production has gained in popularity in the past 15 years as both a set of practices and an intellectual framing for analyzing urbanization in the global South. Discussions of co-production have largely emphasized the cooperative nature of the approach, asserting that a mostly non-confrontational politics has proven effective at reshaping urban governance in ways that better meet the needs of the urban poor. However, recent analyses have identified conflict versus confrontation as a key tension in co-production, especially as co-productive programs seek to go to scale. I contribute to these discussions by analyzing a well-known case of large-scale co-production, Thailand's Baan Mankong program, to understand the roles of insurgent versus cooperative community networks in the program's trajectory. I conclude that a more insurgent network opens up new land, resources and avenues for political participation. A more cooperative network then renders many of these interventions broadly politically acceptable to those in power. The two networks thus exist in a dialectic that has enabled the program's scaling up. I argue that research into co-production should pay more attention to the importance of confrontational tactics by community networks.

Abstract Image

不确定的共同引进:泰国 Baan Mankong 计划中的冲突、合作与规模辩证法
本文探讨了叛乱在扩大住房共同生产中的作用。在过去的 15 年中,共同生产作为分析全球南方城市化的一套实践和知识框架,越来越受欢迎。关于共同生产的讨论在很大程度上强调了这一方法的合作性质,认为这种非对抗性的政治方式已被证明能有效重塑城市治理,从而更好地满足城市贫民的需求。然而,最近的分析发现,冲突与对抗是共同生产中的一个主要矛盾,尤其是当共同生产项目寻求扩大规模时。我通过分析一个著名的大规模共同生产案例--泰国的 Baan Mankong 项目--来理解叛乱与合作社区网络在该项目发展过程中的作用,从而为这些讨论做出贡献。我的结论是,一个更具反叛性的网络为政治参与开辟了新的土地、资源和途径。而合作性更强的网络则使许多干预措施在政治上被当权者广泛接受。因此,这两个网络存在于一种辩证关系中,使该计划得以扩大。我认为,对共同生产的研究应更多地关注社区网络对抗策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: A groundbreaking forum for intellectual debate, IJURR is at the forefront of urban and regional research. With a cutting edge approach to linking theoretical development and empirical research, and a consistent demand for quality, IJURR encompasses key material from an unparalleled range of critical, comparative and geographic perspectives. Embracing a multidisciplinary approach to the field, IJURR is essential reading for social scientists with a concern for the complex, changing roles and futures of cities and regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信