Supportive care improves self-care management and knowledge of patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
K Philippou, N Vouri, A Malaktou, A Samara, M Kyriakou, S Avgousti, E Lambrinou
{"title":"Supportive care improves self-care management and knowledge of patients with heart failure and diabetes mellitus","authors":"K Philippou, N Vouri, A Malaktou, A Samara, M Kyriakou, S Avgousti, E Lambrinou","doi":"10.1093/eurjcn/zvae098.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) most of the times occur together, aggravating patients’ outcomes and the interaction of the two conditions, which is complex, make the application of effective management programs necessary, in order to improve patients’ outcomes. Purpose The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an individualized supportive care management program in patients with HF and DM, in order to improve patients’ self-management compared to the ‘usual’ care. Methods The current study is a sub-analysis of the randomized clinical trial named ‘SupportHeart’ using pragmatic methodology. It was consisted by the intervention group (IG) and the control group (CG). The study investigated the patients for a period of one year at 5 time points (in baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year). Self –care management was measured with the Greek versions of two tools: the ‘Self-care of Heart Failure Index’ (Gr-SCHFI) and the ‘European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale’ (Gr9EHFScBS). Linear Mixed Models Effects (LMME) were also used. Results The sample consisted of 121 patients with HF and DM and 66% were male patients. The Linear Mixed Model results have shown that there was a statistically significant effect of the intervention at all the time points after the intervention p < 0.001 in all the dimensions of the SCHFI; in the dimension of maintenance [1 month=2.6 (0.81, 4.4) p= 0.005, 3 months = 5.2 (3.4, 7.1) p < 0.001, 6 months = 8.1 (6.2, 10) p < 0.001, 1 year = 7.5 (5.7, 9.4) p < 0.001], on the management [1 month = 4.1(2.8, 5.4) p < 0.001, 3 months = 5.1 (3.8, 6.4) p < 0.001, 6 months = 7.5 (6.1, 8.9) p < 0.001, 1 year = 10 (8.7, 11) p < 0.001 and on the self-confidence [1 month =4.9 (3.4, 6.5) p < 0.001, 3 months = 7.8 (6.2, 9.4) p < 0.001, 6 months = 8.5 (6.9, 10) p < 0.001 and in 1 year = 9.1 (7.5, 11) p < 0.001]. The Linear Mixed Model results showed also a statistically significant effect of the intervention at all the time points after the intervention p < 0.001 in all the dimensions of the GR9EHFScBS: in the dimension of adhering to recommendations [1 month=1.5 (0.71, 2.3) p < 0.001, 3 months = 1.4 (0.59, 2.3) p < 0.001, 6 months=1.6 (0.69, 2.4) p < 0.001, in 1 year = 4.3 (3.5, 5.1) p < 0.001], on the fluid and sodium management [1 month = 2.3 (1.3, 3.2) p < 0.001, 3 months = 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) ) p < 0.001, 6 months = 4.5 (3.5, 5.5) p < 0.001, in 1 year = 6.4 (5.4, 7.4) ) p < 0.001 and on the physical activity and recognition of deteriorating symptoms [1 month = 2.6 (1.7, 3.6) p < 0.001, 3 months = 3.4 (2.4, 4.3) p < 0.001, 6 months = 3.9 (2.9, 4.9) p < 0.001, 1 year = 5.8 (4.8, 6.7) p < 0.001]. Conclusion Supportive care seems to be a promising concept for HF-DM management programs. The pragmatic methodology that was used in the research study has an intensive intervention which started rapidly and in early stages, on a person-centred basis.","PeriodicalId":50493,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvae098.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) most of the times occur together, aggravating patients’ outcomes and the interaction of the two conditions, which is complex, make the application of effective management programs necessary, in order to improve patients’ outcomes. Purpose The aim of the current study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an individualized supportive care management program in patients with HF and DM, in order to improve patients’ self-management compared to the ‘usual’ care. Methods The current study is a sub-analysis of the randomized clinical trial named ‘SupportHeart’ using pragmatic methodology. It was consisted by the intervention group (IG) and the control group (CG). The study investigated the patients for a period of one year at 5 time points (in baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year). Self –care management was measured with the Greek versions of two tools: the ‘Self-care of Heart Failure Index’ (Gr-SCHFI) and the ‘European Heart Failure Self-Care Behavior Scale’ (Gr9EHFScBS). Linear Mixed Models Effects (LMME) were also used. Results The sample consisted of 121 patients with HF and DM and 66% were male patients. The Linear Mixed Model results have shown that there was a statistically significant effect of the intervention at all the time points after the intervention p < 0.001 in all the dimensions of the SCHFI; in the dimension of maintenance [1 month=2.6 (0.81, 4.4) p= 0.005, 3 months = 5.2 (3.4, 7.1) p < 0.001, 6 months = 8.1 (6.2, 10) p < 0.001, 1 year = 7.5 (5.7, 9.4) p < 0.001], on the management [1 month = 4.1(2.8, 5.4) p < 0.001, 3 months = 5.1 (3.8, 6.4) p < 0.001, 6 months = 7.5 (6.1, 8.9) p < 0.001, 1 year = 10 (8.7, 11) p < 0.001 and on the self-confidence [1 month =4.9 (3.4, 6.5) p < 0.001, 3 months = 7.8 (6.2, 9.4) p < 0.001, 6 months = 8.5 (6.9, 10) p < 0.001 and in 1 year = 9.1 (7.5, 11) p < 0.001]. The Linear Mixed Model results showed also a statistically significant effect of the intervention at all the time points after the intervention p < 0.001 in all the dimensions of the GR9EHFScBS: in the dimension of adhering to recommendations [1 month=1.5 (0.71, 2.3) p < 0.001, 3 months = 1.4 (0.59, 2.3) p < 0.001, 6 months=1.6 (0.69, 2.4) p < 0.001, in 1 year = 4.3 (3.5, 5.1) p < 0.001], on the fluid and sodium management [1 month = 2.3 (1.3, 3.2) p < 0.001, 3 months = 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) ) p < 0.001, 6 months = 4.5 (3.5, 5.5) p < 0.001, in 1 year = 6.4 (5.4, 7.4) ) p < 0.001 and on the physical activity and recognition of deteriorating symptoms [1 month = 2.6 (1.7, 3.6) p < 0.001, 3 months = 3.4 (2.4, 4.3) p < 0.001, 6 months = 3.9 (2.9, 4.9) p < 0.001, 1 year = 5.8 (4.8, 6.7) p < 0.001]. Conclusion Supportive care seems to be a promising concept for HF-DM management programs. The pragmatic methodology that was used in the research study has an intensive intervention which started rapidly and in early stages, on a person-centred basis.
支持性护理可改善心力衰竭合并糖尿病患者的自我护理管理和知识水平
引言 心力衰竭(HF)和糖尿病(DM)多数情况下同时发生,加重了患者的预后,而且这两种疾病之间的相互作用十分复杂,因此有必要应用有效的管理方案,以改善患者的预后。目的 本研究旨在评估个体化支持性护理管理计划对高血压合并糖尿病患者的效果,与 "常规 "护理相比,该计划可改善患者的自我管理。方法 本次研究是对名为 "SupportHeart "的随机临床试验的子分析,采用的是实用主义方法。它由干预组(IG)和对照组(CG)组成。研究在 5 个时间点(基线、1 个月、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年)对患者进行了为期一年的调查。自我护理管理采用两种工具的希腊语版本进行测量:"心衰自我护理指数"(Gr-SCHFI)和 "欧洲心衰自我护理行为量表"(Gr9EHFScBS)。研究还使用了线性混合模型效应(LMME)。结果 样本包括 121 名高血压和糖尿病患者,66% 为男性患者。线性混合模型结果显示,在干预后的所有时间点,干预效果均有统计学意义 p < 0.001;在维持维度[1个月=2.6(0.81,4.4)p= 0.005,3个月=5.2(3.4,7.1)p< 0.001,6个月=8.1(6.2,10)p< 0.001,1年=7.5(5.7,9.4)p< 0.001],在管理方面[1 个月 = 4.1(2.8, 5.4) p < 0.001, 3 个月 = 5.1 (3.8, 6.4) p < 0.001, 6 个月 = 7.5 (6.1, 8.9) p < 0.001, 1 年 = 10 (8.7, 11) p < 0.0.001,1 年 = 10 (8.7, 11) p < 0.001]。线性混合模型结果显示,在干预后的所有时间点,干预对 GR9EHFScBS 的所有维度都有显著的统计学影响:在遵守建议维度 [1 个月=1.5 (0.71, 2.3) p < 0.001,3 个月=1.4 (0.59, 2.3) p < 0.001,6 个月=1.6 (0.69, 2.4) p < 0.001,1 年内=4.3 (3.5, 5.1) p < 0.001]、液体和钠管理[1 个月 = 2.3 (1.3, 3.2) p < 0.001, 3 个月 = 3.6 (2.6, 4.6) ) p < 0.001, 6 个月 = 4.5 (3.5, 5.5) p < 0.001, 1 年后 = 6.4 (5.4, 7.4) ) p < 0.001,以及在体力活动和识别恶化症状方面[1 个月 = 2.6 (1.7, 3.6) p < 0.001, 3 个月 = 3.4 (2.4, 4.3) p < 0.001, 6 个月 = 3.9 (2.9, 4.9) p < 0.001, 1 年 = 5.8 (4.8, 6.7) p < 0.001]。结论 支持性护理似乎是高频多器官功能障碍管理项目中一个很有前景的概念。研究中采用的务实方法以人为本,在早期阶段迅速开始密集干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-NURSING
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The peer-reviewed journal of the European Society of Cardiology’s Council on Cardiovascular Nursing and Allied Professions (CCNAP) covering the broad field of cardiovascular nursing including chronic and acute care, cardiac rehabilitation, primary and secondary prevention, heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, interventional cardiology, cardiac care, and vascular nursing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信