Stress granule reporter system to assess perfluorooctanoic acid gastric toxicity in vitro

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 TOXICOLOGY
Jung-Min Lee, Kee K. Kim, Eun-Mi Kim
{"title":"Stress granule reporter system to assess perfluorooctanoic acid gastric toxicity in vitro","authors":"Jung-Min Lee, Kee K. Kim, Eun-Mi Kim","doi":"10.1007/s13273-024-00474-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and its alternative compound, hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA), are commonly used in cookware and food packaging because they are structurally stable and have a long half-life. This allows them to enter the human body, where they accumulate and have potentially harmful effects on human health. While the ability of PFOA to induce various cytotoxicities, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, has been studied extensively, little is known about the effects of alternative compounds, such as HFPO-DA, on cells.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the gastrointestinal toxicity of PFOA and HFPO-DA in vitro using a gastrointestinal AGS cell line. We established a real-time stress granule reporter system in human gastrointestinal cell lines by inserting green fluorescent protein into the Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3-domain-binding protein 1 gene using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>We found that PFOA induced the phosphorylation of PERK, which is activated by ER stress in AGS cells, and in contrast, the alternative compound HFPO-DA did not induce the phosphorylation of PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase under the same conditions as PFOA.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Based on our results, we concluded that, unlike PFOA, HFPO-DA does not induce ER stress, suggesting that it is less toxic than PFOA. However, the risks of HFPO-DA cannot be dismissed completely, and further studies comprising different stress conditions are needed to accurately predict the potential risks of alternative compounds, such as HFPO-DA.</p>","PeriodicalId":18683,"journal":{"name":"Molecular & Cellular Toxicology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular & Cellular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13273-024-00474-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and its alternative compound, hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA), are commonly used in cookware and food packaging because they are structurally stable and have a long half-life. This allows them to enter the human body, where they accumulate and have potentially harmful effects on human health. While the ability of PFOA to induce various cytotoxicities, including endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, has been studied extensively, little is known about the effects of alternative compounds, such as HFPO-DA, on cells.

Objectives

This study aimed to evaluate the gastrointestinal toxicity of PFOA and HFPO-DA in vitro using a gastrointestinal AGS cell line. We established a real-time stress granule reporter system in human gastrointestinal cell lines by inserting green fluorescent protein into the Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3-domain-binding protein 1 gene using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homologous recombination.

Results

We found that PFOA induced the phosphorylation of PERK, which is activated by ER stress in AGS cells, and in contrast, the alternative compound HFPO-DA did not induce the phosphorylation of PKR-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase under the same conditions as PFOA.

Conclusion

Based on our results, we concluded that, unlike PFOA, HFPO-DA does not induce ER stress, suggesting that it is less toxic than PFOA. However, the risks of HFPO-DA cannot be dismissed completely, and further studies comprising different stress conditions are needed to accurately predict the potential risks of alternative compounds, such as HFPO-DA.

Abstract Image

体外评估全氟辛酸胃毒性的应激颗粒报告系统
背景全氟辛酸(PFOA)及其替代化合物六氟环氧丙烷二聚酸(HFPO-DA)常用于炊具和食品包装,因为它们结构稳定,半衰期长。这使得它们能够进入人体,并在人体内蓄积,对人体健康产生潜在的有害影响。尽管对 PFOA 诱导各种细胞毒性(包括内质网(ER)应激)的能力进行了广泛研究,但对 HFPO-DA 等替代化合物对细胞的影响却知之甚少。我们利用 CRISPR/Cas9 介导的同源重组将绿色荧光蛋白插入 Ras-GTPase-activating protein SH3-domain-binding protein 1 基因,在人胃肠细胞系中建立了实时应激颗粒报告系统。结果我们发现,在 AGS 细胞中,PFOA 会诱导 PERK 的磷酸化,而 PERK 会被 ER 应激激活;相比之下,在与 PFOA 相同的条件下,替代化合物 HFPO-DA 不会诱导 PKR 样内质网激酶的磷酸化。然而,不能完全排除 HFPO-DA 的风险,还需要在不同应激条件下进行进一步研究,以准确预测 HFPO-DA 等替代化合物的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
17.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular & Cellular Toxicology publishes original research and reviews in all areas of the complex interaction between the cell´s genome (the sum of all genes within the chromosome), chemicals in the environment, and disease. Acceptable manuscripts are the ones that deal with some topics of environmental contaminants, including those that lie in the domains of analytical chemistry, biochemistry, pharmacology and toxicology with the aspects of molecular and cellular levels. Emphasis will be placed on toxic effects observed at relevant genomics and proteomics, which have direct impact on drug development, environment health, food safety, preventive medicine, and forensic medicine. The journal is committed to rapid peer review to ensure the publication of highest quality original research and timely news and review articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信