Exploring the impact of psychosocial learning environments and instructional modalities on academic achievement in blended computer science education

IF 2.7 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Shonn Cheng, Hsuan-Pu Chang, Sheng-Shiang Tseng
{"title":"Exploring the impact of psychosocial learning environments and instructional modalities on academic achievement in blended computer science education","authors":"Shonn Cheng, Hsuan-Pu Chang, Sheng-Shiang Tseng","doi":"10.1007/s10212-024-00884-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The goal of the present study was to explore the relations among perceived psychosocial learning environments, instructional modality, motivation, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement in blended computer science education. The participants were 207 undergraduate students enrolled in a blended online and face-to-face design course. We employed exploratory structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Our findings indicated that within the perceived psychosocial learning environments, dimensions such as personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning significantly predicted various motivational beliefs. Furthermore, active learning and expectancy were strong predictors of effective time management, while instructional modality and emotional cost were closely linked to academic procrastination. Notably, academic procrastination emerged as the sole significant predictor of academic achievement, measured by course grades. These results suggest that traditional curricula emphasizing textbook reading and code memorization may be ineffective in teaching computer science. Additionally, our study highlights a higher tendency for procrastination in online settings. We recommend a curriculum focused on personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning to better motivate students and enhance their ability to manage their learning effectively. To improve academic achievement in computer science education, it is crucial to address maladaptive self-regulatory processes and motivational beliefs, which primarily arise from active learning and instructional modality. We will conclude with specific recommendations for designing learning environments that better support computer science education.</p>","PeriodicalId":47800,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00884-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to explore the relations among perceived psychosocial learning environments, instructional modality, motivation, self-regulated learning, and academic achievement in blended computer science education. The participants were 207 undergraduate students enrolled in a blended online and face-to-face design course. We employed exploratory structural equation modeling to analyze the data. Our findings indicated that within the perceived psychosocial learning environments, dimensions such as personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning significantly predicted various motivational beliefs. Furthermore, active learning and expectancy were strong predictors of effective time management, while instructional modality and emotional cost were closely linked to academic procrastination. Notably, academic procrastination emerged as the sole significant predictor of academic achievement, measured by course grades. These results suggest that traditional curricula emphasizing textbook reading and code memorization may be ineffective in teaching computer science. Additionally, our study highlights a higher tendency for procrastination in online settings. We recommend a curriculum focused on personal relevance, authentic learning, and active learning to better motivate students and enhance their ability to manage their learning effectively. To improve academic achievement in computer science education, it is crucial to address maladaptive self-regulatory processes and motivational beliefs, which primarily arise from active learning and instructional modality. We will conclude with specific recommendations for designing learning environments that better support computer science education.

Abstract Image

探索混合式计算机科学教育中社会心理学习环境和教学模式对学习成绩的影响
本研究旨在探讨混合式计算机科学教育中感知的社会心理学习环境、教学模式、学习动机、自我调节学习和学业成绩之间的关系。研究对象是 207 名本科生,他们参加了一门在线和面授混合设计课程。我们采用了探索性结构方程模型来分析数据。我们的研究结果表明,在感知的社会心理学习环境中,个人相关性、真实学习和主动学习等维度能显著预测各种动机信念。此外,主动学习和期望是有效时间管理的有力预测因素,而教学模式和情感成本则与学业拖延密切相关。值得注意的是,学业拖延是以课程成绩衡量的学业成绩的唯一重要预测因素。这些结果表明,强调课本阅读和代码记忆的传统课程在计算机科学教学中可能是无效的。此外,我们的研究还强调了在线环境下更高的拖延倾向。我们建议采用注重个人相关性、真实学习和主动学习的课程,以更好地激励学生,提高他们有效管理学习的能力。要提高计算机科学教育中的学业成绩,关键是要解决不适应的自我调节过程和动机信念问题,这主要是由主动学习和教学模式引起的。最后,我们将就如何设计更好地支持计算机科学教育的学习环境提出具体建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
3.30%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychology of Education (EJPE) is a quarterly journal oriented toward publishing high-quality papers that address the relevant psychological aspects of educational processes embedded in different institutional, social, and cultural contexts, and which focus on diversity in terms of the participants, their educational trajectories and their socio-cultural contexts. Authors are strongly encouraged to employ a variety of theoretical and methodological tools developed in the psychology of education in order to gain new insights by integrating different perspectives. Instead of reinforcing the divisions and distances between different communities stemming from their theoretical and methodological backgrounds, we would like to invite authors to engage with diverse theoretical and methodological tools in a meaningful way and to search for the new knowledge that can emerge from a combination of these tools. EJPE is open to all papers reflecting findings from original psychological studies on educational processes, as well as to exceptional theoretical and review papers that integrate current knowledge and chart new avenues for future research. Following the assumption that engaging with diversities creates great opportunities for new knowledge, the editorial team wishes to encourage, in particular, authors from less represented countries and regions, as well as young researchers, to submit their work and to keep going through the review process, which can be challenging, but which also presents opportunities for learning and inspiration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信