Structure and Function of Restored and Natural Salt Marshes: Implications for Ecosystem Resilience and Adaptive Potential

IF 2.3 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sarah C. Crosby, David M. Hudson, A. Randall Hughes, Anna Bartholet, Kasey T. Burns, Mary K. Donato, Devan S. Healy, Rebha Raviraj, Katherine Sperry, Nicole C. Spiller, Justin Susarchick
{"title":"Structure and Function of Restored and Natural Salt Marshes: Implications for Ecosystem Resilience and Adaptive Potential","authors":"Sarah C. Crosby, David M. Hudson, A. Randall Hughes, Anna Bartholet, Kasey T. Burns, Mary K. Donato, Devan S. Healy, Rebha Raviraj, Katherine Sperry, Nicole C. Spiller, Justin Susarchick","doi":"10.1007/s12237-024-01395-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Salt marshes have ecological and economic value, but shoreline development, the increasing rate of sea-level rise, and other human impacts have caused significant loss of salt marshes. As a result, restoration of these ecosystems is widespread. For restoration and management to be effective, it is imperative to improve our understanding of marsh-building plants that serve as the ecological foundation of these habitats. Given the observed differences in characteristics between populations of smooth cordgrass, <i>Spartina alterniflora</i>, restoration plantings may impact the biodiversity and resilience of restored ecosystems. Understanding differences in the structural and functional outcomes of active planting of restoration sites will enable the long-term success of restoration efforts to be improved. Natural and restored salt marshes in Long Island Sound were studied in 2021–2022 for <i>S. alterniflora</i> genetics, biomass, stem morphology, and faunal community composition. The average genotypic diversity of <i>S. alterniflora</i> was more than 4 times higher in restored than in natural marshes, and differentiation between each restored site and natural sites decreased with time. No difference was observed in live <i>S. alterniflora</i> belowground biomass; however, mean dead belowground biomass in natural marshes was more than 3 times greater than in restored marshes. Marsh platform invertebrates differed between the restored and natural sites, with natural marsh edge habitats having 9 times higher density of <i>Geukensia demissa</i> and 3 times as many crab burrows than in restored marshes, but there was no detected difference in species richness or abundance of nekton at high tide. With restoration practitioners seeking resilient, self-sustaining ecosystems, it is important to evaluate whether restored marsh characteristics are consistent with those goals and modify restoration planning accordingly to incorporate genetics, structure, and function.</p>","PeriodicalId":11921,"journal":{"name":"Estuaries and Coasts","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuaries and Coasts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-024-01395-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Salt marshes have ecological and economic value, but shoreline development, the increasing rate of sea-level rise, and other human impacts have caused significant loss of salt marshes. As a result, restoration of these ecosystems is widespread. For restoration and management to be effective, it is imperative to improve our understanding of marsh-building plants that serve as the ecological foundation of these habitats. Given the observed differences in characteristics between populations of smooth cordgrass, Spartina alterniflora, restoration plantings may impact the biodiversity and resilience of restored ecosystems. Understanding differences in the structural and functional outcomes of active planting of restoration sites will enable the long-term success of restoration efforts to be improved. Natural and restored salt marshes in Long Island Sound were studied in 2021–2022 for S. alterniflora genetics, biomass, stem morphology, and faunal community composition. The average genotypic diversity of S. alterniflora was more than 4 times higher in restored than in natural marshes, and differentiation between each restored site and natural sites decreased with time. No difference was observed in live S. alterniflora belowground biomass; however, mean dead belowground biomass in natural marshes was more than 3 times greater than in restored marshes. Marsh platform invertebrates differed between the restored and natural sites, with natural marsh edge habitats having 9 times higher density of Geukensia demissa and 3 times as many crab burrows than in restored marshes, but there was no detected difference in species richness or abundance of nekton at high tide. With restoration practitioners seeking resilient, self-sustaining ecosystems, it is important to evaluate whether restored marsh characteristics are consistent with those goals and modify restoration planning accordingly to incorporate genetics, structure, and function.

Abstract Image

修复和自然盐沼的结构与功能:对生态系统复原力和适应潜力的影响
盐沼具有生态和经济价值,但海岸线开发、海平面上升速度加快以及其他人类影响已导致盐沼大量消失。因此,恢复这些生态系统的工作十分普遍。为了有效地进行恢复和管理,当务之急是加深我们对作为这些栖息地生态基础的沼泽植物的了解。鉴于观察到的平滑脐草(Spartina alterniflora)种群之间的特征差异,恢复性种植可能会影响恢复后生态系统的生物多样性和恢复力。了解恢复地点积极种植的结构和功能结果的差异,将有助于提高恢复工作的长期成功率。2021-2022 年,研究人员对长岛湾的天然盐沼和修复盐沼进行了研究,以了解交替花属植物的遗传学、生物量、茎干形态和动物群落组成。恢复后的盐沼中,交替花属植物的平均基因型多样性是天然盐沼的 4 倍多,而且每个恢复地点与天然地点之间的差异随着时间的推移而减小。在地下活的交替花生物量方面没有观察到差异;然而,自然沼泽中地下死亡生物量的平均值是恢复沼泽的 3 倍多。沼泽平台无脊椎动物在修复地点和自然地点之间存在差异,自然沼泽边缘栖息地的 Geukensia demissa 密度是修复沼泽的 9 倍,螃蟹洞穴的数量是修复沼泽的 3 倍,但在涨潮时没有检测到物种丰富度或小型底栖生物丰度方面的差异。随着恢复实践者寻求有弹性、可自我维持的生态系统,评估恢复后的沼泽特征是否符合这些目标并相应修改恢复规划以纳入遗传、结构和功能非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Estuaries and Coasts
Estuaries and Coasts 环境科学-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Estuaries and Coasts is the journal of the Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (CERF). Begun in 1977 as Chesapeake Science, the journal has gradually expanded its scope and circulation. Today, the journal publishes scholarly manuscripts on estuarine and near coastal ecosystems at the interface between the land and the sea where there are tidal fluctuations or sea water is diluted by fresh water. The interface is broadly defined to include estuaries and nearshore coastal waters including lagoons, wetlands, tidal fresh water, shores and beaches, but not the continental shelf. The journal covers research on physical, chemical, geological or biological processes, as well as applications to management of estuaries and coasts. The journal publishes original research findings, reviews and perspectives, techniques, comments, and management applications. Estuaries and Coasts will consider properly carried out studies that present inconclusive findings or document a failed replication of previously published work. Submissions that are primarily descriptive, strongly place-based, or only report on development of models or new methods without detailing their applications fall outside the scope of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信