The impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the patients undergoing anesthesia or sedation: systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Tatiana S. do Nascimento, Rodrigo O. L. Pereira, Eduardo Maia, Tetsu Ohnuma, Mariana G. da Costa, Eric Slawka, Carlos Galhardo, Vijay Krishnamoorthy
{"title":"The impact of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in the patients undergoing anesthesia or sedation: systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Tatiana S. do Nascimento, Rodrigo O. L. Pereira, Eduardo Maia, Tetsu Ohnuma, Mariana G. da Costa, Eric Slawka, Carlos Galhardo, Vijay Krishnamoorthy","doi":"10.1186/s13741-024-00439-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist receptors (GLP-1RAs), medications used for glycemic control and weight loss, are increasing worldwide. In the perioperative period, the major concern related to GLP-1RA is gastric emptying delay and risk of aspiration. This meta-analysis and systematic review compared the risks and benefits of using GLP-1 agonist receptors and control in surgical and nonsurgical procedures under anesthesia or sedation. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving patients > 18 years undergoing elective surgeries or procedures. Outcomes of interest were pre-procedural gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, residual gastric content assessed by endoscopy, pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia/sedation, perioperative glycemic control, postoperative inotropic support, nausea/vomiting (PONV), atrial fibrillation, and 30-day mortality rate. We used a random effects model, with odds ratio and mean difference computed for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Fourteen randomized and observational studies with 2143 adult patients undergoing elective surgeries and procedures were included. GLP-1RA resulted in increased pre-procedural GI symptoms (OR 7.66; 95% CI 3.42, 17.17; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and elevated residual gastric content (OR 6.08; 95% CI 2.86, 12.94; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). GLP-1RA resulted in lower glycemic levels (MD − 0.73; 95% CI − 1.13, − 0.33; p = 0.0003; I2 = 90%) and lower rate of rescue insulin administration (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.23, 0.68 p = 0.0009; I2 = 35%). There was no significant difference in rate of perioperative hypoglycemia (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.29, 1.24; p = 0.17; I2 = 0%), hyperglycemia (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.59, 1.34; p = 0.58; I2 = 38%), need for postoperative inotropic support (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.33, 1.01; p = 0.05; I2 = 0%), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.52, 2.01; p = 0.95; I2 = 16%), rate of PONV (OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.82, 2.21; p = 0.24; I2 = 0%), and 30-day mortality rate (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.14, 2.05; p = 0.25; I2 = 0%). Compared to control, pre-procedural GLP-1RA increased the rate of GI symptoms and the risk of elevated residual gastric content despite adherence to fasting guidelines. GLP-1RA improved glycemic control and decreased the rate of rescue insulin administration. There was no significant difference in the rates of perioperative hypo or hyperglycemia, postoperative inotropic support, PONV, atrial fibrillation, and 30-day mortality. • Question: What are the benefits and risks of using GLP-1RAs in patients undergoing anesthesia or sedation? • Finding: This meta-analysis demonstrates that perioperative GLP-1RAs increased the rate of GI symptoms and the risk of elevated residual gastric content, improved glycemic control, and did not change the rates of hypo or hyperglycemia, postoperative inotropic support, PONV, atrial fibrillation, and 30-day mortality. • Meaning: Despite improving glycemic control, providers must be aware of the potential risk of anesthesia-related gastrointestinal dysfunction and pulmonary aspiration associated with using GLP-1RA.","PeriodicalId":19764,"journal":{"name":"Perioperative Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perioperative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13741-024-00439-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 agonist receptors (GLP-1RAs), medications used for glycemic control and weight loss, are increasing worldwide. In the perioperative period, the major concern related to GLP-1RA is gastric emptying delay and risk of aspiration. This meta-analysis and systematic review compared the risks and benefits of using GLP-1 agonist receptors and control in surgical and nonsurgical procedures under anesthesia or sedation. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials and observational studies involving patients > 18 years undergoing elective surgeries or procedures. Outcomes of interest were pre-procedural gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, residual gastric content assessed by endoscopy, pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia/sedation, perioperative glycemic control, postoperative inotropic support, nausea/vomiting (PONV), atrial fibrillation, and 30-day mortality rate. We used a random effects model, with odds ratio and mean difference computed for binary and continuous outcomes, respectively. Fourteen randomized and observational studies with 2143 adult patients undergoing elective surgeries and procedures were included. GLP-1RA resulted in increased pre-procedural GI symptoms (OR 7.66; 95% CI 3.42, 17.17; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and elevated residual gastric content (OR 6.08; 95% CI 2.86, 12.94; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%). GLP-1RA resulted in lower glycemic levels (MD − 0.73; 95% CI − 1.13, − 0.33; p = 0.0003; I2 = 90%) and lower rate of rescue insulin administration (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.23, 0.68 p = 0.0009; I2 = 35%). There was no significant difference in rate of perioperative hypoglycemia (OR 0.60; 95% CI 0.29, 1.24; p = 0.17; I2 = 0%), hyperglycemia (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.59, 1.34; p = 0.58; I2 = 38%), need for postoperative inotropic support (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.33, 1.01; p = 0.05; I2 = 0%), atrial fibrillation (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.52, 2.01; p = 0.95; I2 = 16%), rate of PONV (OR 1.35; 95% CI 0.82, 2.21; p = 0.24; I2 = 0%), and 30-day mortality rate (OR 0.54; 95% CI 0.14, 2.05; p = 0.25; I2 = 0%). Compared to control, pre-procedural GLP-1RA increased the rate of GI symptoms and the risk of elevated residual gastric content despite adherence to fasting guidelines. GLP-1RA improved glycemic control and decreased the rate of rescue insulin administration. There was no significant difference in the rates of perioperative hypo or hyperglycemia, postoperative inotropic support, PONV, atrial fibrillation, and 30-day mortality. • Question: What are the benefits and risks of using GLP-1RAs in patients undergoing anesthesia or sedation? • Finding: This meta-analysis demonstrates that perioperative GLP-1RAs increased the rate of GI symptoms and the risk of elevated residual gastric content, improved glycemic control, and did not change the rates of hypo or hyperglycemia, postoperative inotropic support, PONV, atrial fibrillation, and 30-day mortality. • Meaning: Despite improving glycemic control, providers must be aware of the potential risk of anesthesia-related gastrointestinal dysfunction and pulmonary aspiration associated with using GLP-1RA.
胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂对麻醉或镇静患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析
胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1RA)是一种用于控制血糖和减轻体重的药物,在全球范围内的使用量不断增加。在围手术期,与 GLP-1RA 相关的主要问题是胃排空延迟和吸入风险。这项荟萃分析和系统性综述比较了在麻醉或镇静状态下的外科手术和非外科手术中使用 GLP-1 激动剂受体和控制的风险和益处。我们系统检索了 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 中涉及接受择期手术或程序的 18 岁以上患者的随机对照试验和观察性研究。我们关注的结果包括术前胃肠道 (GI) 症状、内镜评估的残留胃内容物、麻醉/镇静期间的肺吸入、围术期血糖控制、术后肌力支持、恶心/呕吐 (PONV)、心房颤动和 30 天死亡率。我们采用随机效应模型,分别计算二元和连续结果的几率比和平均差。14项随机研究和观察性研究共纳入了2143名接受择期手术和程序的成年患者。GLP-1RA 导致手术前消化道症状加重(OR 7.66;95% CI 3.42,17.17;p < 0.00001;I2 = 0%)和残胃含量升高(OR 6.08;95% CI 2.86,12.94;p < 0.00001;I2 = 0%)。GLP-1RA 可降低血糖水平(MD - 0.73; 95% CI - 1.13, - 0.33; p = 0.0003; I2 = 90%)和胰岛素抢救用药率(OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.23, 0.68 p = 0.0009; I2 = 35%)。围手术期低血糖率(OR 0.60;95% CI 0.29,1.24;P = 0.17;I2 = 0%)、高血糖率(OR 0.89;95% CI 0.59,1.34;P = 0.58;I2 = 38%)、术后肌力支持需求(OR 0.57;95% CI 0.33,1.01;P = 0.05;I2 = 0%)、心房颤动(OR 1.02;95% CI 0.52,2.01;P = 0.95;I2 = 16%)、PONV 发生率(OR 1.35;95% CI 0.82,2.21;P = 0.24;I2 = 0%)和 30 天死亡率(OR 0.54;95% CI 0.14,2.05;P = 0.25;I2 = 0%)。与对照组相比,尽管遵守了空腹指南,但术前 GLP-1RA 增加了消化道症状的发生率和残胃含量升高的风险。GLP-1RA 改善了血糖控制,降低了胰岛素抢救用药率。围术期低血糖或高血糖、术后肌力支持、PONV、心房颤动和 30 天死亡率无明显差异。- 问题麻醉或镇静患者使用 GLP-1RA 的益处和风险是什么?- 研究结果这项荟萃分析表明,围手术期 GLP-1RAs 增加了消化道症状的发生率和残留胃内容物升高的风险,改善了血糖控制,但并未改变低血糖或高血糖、术后肌力支持、PONV、心房颤动和 30 天死亡率的发生率。- 这意味着什么?尽管GLP-1RA能改善血糖控制,但医疗服务提供者必须意识到使用GLP-1RA可能存在麻醉相关胃肠功能紊乱和肺吸入的潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
55
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信