Rendered Obsolete: Energy Culture and the Afterlife of US Whaling by Jamie L. Jones (review)

IF 0.8 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Amy Kohout
{"title":"Rendered Obsolete: Energy Culture and the Afterlife of US Whaling by Jamie L. Jones (review)","authors":"Amy Kohout","doi":"10.1353/tech.2024.a933136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Rendered Obsolete: Energy Culture and the Afterlife of US Whaling</em> by Jamie L. Jones <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Amy Kohout (bio) </li> </ul> <em>Rendered Obsolete: Energy Culture and the Afterlife of US Whaling</em><br/> By Jamie L. Jones. Raleigh: University of North Carolina Press, 2023. Pp. 244. <p>It might be because my family has been watching <em>The Crown</em>, but as soon as I read that George H. Newton and Fred J. Engel-hardt orchestrated the tour of a dead whale around the U.S. Midwest in the early 1880s—and that it became known as the “Prince of Whales”—Jamie L. Jones had sold me on <em>Rendered Obsolete</em>. While this whale is the subject of just one chapter, the Prince of Whales operates as a compelling example of the way Jones thinks about the relationship between whaling and what she calls “fossil modernity” (p. xi).</p> <p><em>Rendered Obsolete</em> is an interdisciplinary environmental humanities project that engages energy studies, infrastructure studies, media studies, and oceanic studies to model what Jones calls “energy archaeology,” or “a way of telling the history of energy from the point of view of the present in order to locate the traces of old energy resources, technologies, and cultures in <strong>[End Page 1057]</strong> contemporary and emerging energy cultures” (p. 14). This move destabilizes the boundaries between different kinds of energy regimes and helps readers see how “whaling culture scaffolded fossil fuel culture” (p. 7), resulting in a rich cultural history of an earlier energy transition. Each chapter centers different sites of cultural production: <em>Moby-Dick</em> and the Rockwell Kent illustrations accompanying a 1930 edition are the subjects of chapters 1 and 5; the rise of “quaintness tourism” and meaning-making on Nantucket in chapter 2 and the whitewashing of whaling history (specifically whalers), using what Jones calls “extractivist nostalgia” (p. 119), in chapter 4 situate shifts in whaling culture in place; and the paired inland stories of the Prince of Whales and the <em>Progress</em>, a wooden whaling ship transported to the 1893 World’s Fair, are the focus of chapter 3. Combined, these chapters offer a nuanced, novel take on how whaling and whaling culture reflect “the flickering associations of modernity and obsolescence” (p. 113) in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.</p> <p>While readers familiar with the concepts Jones is engaging here will find much to think with, <em>Rendered Obsolete</em> also offers readers from a broad range of disciplines pathways into the book’s big ideas. I want to underscore the accessibility of the chapters centered on Melville; even those not well versed in literary studies might feel called to (re)visit the white whale as a result of Jones’s discussion of how “the novel offers a keen reflection on the future of energy economies after energy transition” (p. 53). This opens into a consideration of extinction and obsolescence in whaling communities like Nantucket; urban historians and scholars of work and leisure, as well as public historians interested in memory work, will be interested in Jones’s Nantucket chapters (chs. 2 and 4). Jones demonstrates the persistent linkages between material and cultural elements throughout the book, but one remarkable example is her reading of Rockwell Kent’s <em>Moby-Dick</em> illustrations—drawings made to look like woodblock prints, often featuring wood and woodworking, which lead Jones to characterize these “skeuomorphs” as evidence of Kent’s “nostalgia for unmechanized, physical labor” (p. 165) and to invite us to join her in linking whalers’ labor, artists’ renderings of that labor, and the energy regimes powering them. And of course, I could not get enough of the Prince of Whales; I found the way Jones used the concept of “remediation” (p. 98) to frame American encounters with a whale corpse that was constantly being managed and transformed to be especially compelling.</p> <p><em>Rendered Obsolete</em> concludes with Jones’s experience sailing on the <em>Charles W. Morgan</em>, a whaling ship that was restored for a special thirty-eighth voyage in 2014 before returning to the Mystic Seaport Museum. The <em>Morgan</em> is another example of whaling infrastructure reimagined for a new purpose—further evidence of how older energy regimes shape those that follow. Here we see the larger stakes of Jones’s book: “The history of whaling’s afterlife...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":49446,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Culture","volume":"161 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Culture","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tech.2024.a933136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reviewed by:

  • Rendered Obsolete: Energy Culture and the Afterlife of US Whaling by Jamie L. Jones
  • Amy Kohout (bio)
Rendered Obsolete: Energy Culture and the Afterlife of US Whaling
By Jamie L. Jones. Raleigh: University of North Carolina Press, 2023. Pp. 244.

It might be because my family has been watching The Crown, but as soon as I read that George H. Newton and Fred J. Engel-hardt orchestrated the tour of a dead whale around the U.S. Midwest in the early 1880s—and that it became known as the “Prince of Whales”—Jamie L. Jones had sold me on Rendered Obsolete. While this whale is the subject of just one chapter, the Prince of Whales operates as a compelling example of the way Jones thinks about the relationship between whaling and what she calls “fossil modernity” (p. xi).

Rendered Obsolete is an interdisciplinary environmental humanities project that engages energy studies, infrastructure studies, media studies, and oceanic studies to model what Jones calls “energy archaeology,” or “a way of telling the history of energy from the point of view of the present in order to locate the traces of old energy resources, technologies, and cultures in [End Page 1057] contemporary and emerging energy cultures” (p. 14). This move destabilizes the boundaries between different kinds of energy regimes and helps readers see how “whaling culture scaffolded fossil fuel culture” (p. 7), resulting in a rich cultural history of an earlier energy transition. Each chapter centers different sites of cultural production: Moby-Dick and the Rockwell Kent illustrations accompanying a 1930 edition are the subjects of chapters 1 and 5; the rise of “quaintness tourism” and meaning-making on Nantucket in chapter 2 and the whitewashing of whaling history (specifically whalers), using what Jones calls “extractivist nostalgia” (p. 119), in chapter 4 situate shifts in whaling culture in place; and the paired inland stories of the Prince of Whales and the Progress, a wooden whaling ship transported to the 1893 World’s Fair, are the focus of chapter 3. Combined, these chapters offer a nuanced, novel take on how whaling and whaling culture reflect “the flickering associations of modernity and obsolescence” (p. 113) in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

While readers familiar with the concepts Jones is engaging here will find much to think with, Rendered Obsolete also offers readers from a broad range of disciplines pathways into the book’s big ideas. I want to underscore the accessibility of the chapters centered on Melville; even those not well versed in literary studies might feel called to (re)visit the white whale as a result of Jones’s discussion of how “the novel offers a keen reflection on the future of energy economies after energy transition” (p. 53). This opens into a consideration of extinction and obsolescence in whaling communities like Nantucket; urban historians and scholars of work and leisure, as well as public historians interested in memory work, will be interested in Jones’s Nantucket chapters (chs. 2 and 4). Jones demonstrates the persistent linkages between material and cultural elements throughout the book, but one remarkable example is her reading of Rockwell Kent’s Moby-Dick illustrations—drawings made to look like woodblock prints, often featuring wood and woodworking, which lead Jones to characterize these “skeuomorphs” as evidence of Kent’s “nostalgia for unmechanized, physical labor” (p. 165) and to invite us to join her in linking whalers’ labor, artists’ renderings of that labor, and the energy regimes powering them. And of course, I could not get enough of the Prince of Whales; I found the way Jones used the concept of “remediation” (p. 98) to frame American encounters with a whale corpse that was constantly being managed and transformed to be especially compelling.

Rendered Obsolete concludes with Jones’s experience sailing on the Charles W. Morgan, a whaling ship that was restored for a special thirty-eighth voyage in 2014 before returning to the Mystic Seaport Museum. The Morgan is another example of whaling infrastructure reimagined for a new purpose—further evidence of how older energy regimes shape those that follow. Here we see the larger stakes of Jones’s book: “The history of whaling’s afterlife...

被废弃的:能源文化与美国捕鲸业的来世》,杰米-L-琼斯著(评论)
审查: Rendered Obsolete:能源文化与美国捕鲸业的来世》杰米-L-琼斯 Amy Kohout (bio) Rendered Obsolete:能源文化与美国捕鲸业的来世》,杰米-L-琼斯著。罗利:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2023 年。第 244 页。可能是因为我家人一直在看《王冠》的缘故,我一读到乔治-H-牛顿(George H. Newton)和弗雷德-J-恩格尔-哈特(Fred J. Engel-hardt)在 19 世纪 80 年代初精心策划了一条死鲸在美国中西部的巡游--这条鲸后来被称为 "鲸鱼王子"--杰米-L-琼斯(Jamie L. Jones)就向我推荐了《废弃的鲸鱼》。虽然这头鲸鱼只是其中一章的主题,但 "鲸鱼王子 "却是琼斯思考捕鲸与她所谓的 "化石现代性"(第 xi 页)之间关系的一个令人信服的例子。Rendered Obsolete 是一个跨学科的环境人文学科项目,它将能源研究、基础设施研究、媒体研究和海洋研究结合起来,建立了琼斯所说的 "能源考古学 "模型,或者说是 "一种从现在的角度讲述能源历史的方式,以便在 [第1057页完] 当代和新兴能源文化中找到旧能源资源、技术和文化的痕迹"(第14页)。此举打破了不同类型能源制度之间的界限,帮助读者了解 "捕鲸文化是如何为化石燃料文化搭建支架的"(第 7 页),从而为早期的能源转型提供了丰富的文化史。每一章都以不同的文化生产场所为中心:第 1 章和第 5 章的主题是《白鲸记》和 1930 年版的洛克威尔-肯特(Rockwell Kent)插图;第 2 章的主题是 "古朴旅游 "的兴起和南塔基特岛的意义创造;第 4 章的主题是对捕鲸历史(特别是捕鲸者)的粉饰,琼斯称之为 "采掘主义怀旧"(第 119 页)。第 3 章的重点是 "鲸鱼王子号 "和 "进步号"(一艘运往 1893 年世界博览会的木制捕鲸船)在内陆的故事。这些章节结合在一起,对捕鲸和捕鲸文化如何反映十九世纪末二十世纪初 "现代性和过时性的闪烁联系"(第 113 页)进行了细致入微的新颖解读。虽然熟悉琼斯在此书中涉及的概念的读者会发现很多值得思考的问题,但《被废弃的捕鲸》也为来自不同学科的读者提供了通往书中重要思想的途径。我想强调的是,以梅尔维尔为中心的章节非常容易阅读;即使是对文学研究不甚了解的人,也可能会因为琼斯关于 "这部小说如何对能源转型后能源经济的未来进行了敏锐的反思"(第53页)的讨论而感到需要(重新)访问白鲸。这开启了对南塔基特等捕鲸社区的消亡和淘汰的思考;城市历史学家、工作与休闲学者以及对记忆工作感兴趣的公共历史学家都会对琼斯的南塔基特章节(第 2 章和第 4 章)感兴趣。琼斯在全书中展示了物质和文化元素之间的持久联系,但其中一个显著的例子是她对罗克韦尔-肯特的《白鲸》插图的解读--这些插图看起来像木版画,通常以木材和木工为主题,这使得琼斯将这些 "skeuomorphs "描述为肯特 "对非机械化、体力劳动的怀旧 "的证据(第 165 页),并邀请我们与她一起将捕鲸者的劳动、艺术家对这种劳动的描绘以及为其提供动力的能源制度联系起来。当然,我对 "鲸鱼王子 "爱不释手;我发现琼斯使用 "补救"(remediation)(第 98 页)这一概念来描述美国人与不断被管理和改造的鲸鱼尸体相遇的方式尤其引人入胜。这艘捕鲸船在 2014 年进行了第 38 次特别航行,之后被修复并送回神秘海港博物馆。摩根号 "是捕鲸基础设施为新目的重新设计的另一个例子,进一步证明了旧的能源制度是如何塑造后来者的。在这里,我们看到了琼斯这本书的更大意义:"捕鲸史的来世......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Technology and Culture
Technology and Culture 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Technology and Culture, the preeminent journal of the history of technology, draws on scholarship in diverse disciplines to publish insightful pieces intended for general readers as well as specialists. Subscribers include scientists, engineers, anthropologists, sociologists, economists, museum curators, archivists, scholars, librarians, educators, historians, and many others. In addition to scholarly essays, each issue features 30-40 book reviews and reviews of new museum exhibitions. To illuminate important debates and draw attention to specific topics, the journal occasionally publishes thematic issues. Technology and Culture is the official journal of the Society for the History of Technology (SHOT).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信