Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in reducing pain score and healing time of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 6.3 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Desiana Radithia, Fatma Yasmin Mahdani, Reiska Kumala Bakti, Adiastuti Endah Parmadiati, Ajiravudh Subarnbhesaj, Selviana Rizky Pramitha, I Gusti Agung Sri Pradnyani
{"title":"Effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in reducing pain score and healing time of recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Desiana Radithia, Fatma Yasmin Mahdani, Reiska Kumala Bakti, Adiastuti Endah Parmadiati, Ajiravudh Subarnbhesaj, Selviana Rizky Pramitha, I Gusti Agung Sri Pradnyani","doi":"10.1186/s13643-024-02595-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common chronic inflammatory oral disease that negatively impacts the quality of life. Current therapies aim to reduce pain and healing process yet challenges such as rapid loss due to salivary flushing in topical drugs and adverse effects due to prolonged use of systemic medications require further notice. Low-level laser therapy is reported with immediate pain relief and faster healing thus preserving the potential for optimal treatment modalities. This review critically analyses and summarizes the effectiveness of LLLT in reducing pain scores and healing time of RAS. A systematic search was conducted in ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Scopus using keywords of low-level laser therapy, photo-biomodulation therapy, and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. RCTs between 1967 to June 2022, presenting characteristics of the laser and reporting pain score and/or healing time of RAS after irradiation were included. Animal studies and recurrent aphthous ulcers with a history of systemic conditions were excluded. Studies were critically appraised using the RoB 2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed using inverse variance random effects. Fourteen trials with a total of 664 patients were included. Reduced pain was reported in 13 studies, while shortened healing time was presented in 4. The pooling of two studies after CO2 irradiation demonstrated faster healing time compared to placebo (MD − 3.72; 95% CI − 4.18, − 3.25). Pain score and healing time of RAS were reduced after irradiation with LLLT. RoB resulted in “some concerns” urging well-designed RCTs with larger samples to further assess each laser application for comparison. PROSPERO CRD42022355737.","PeriodicalId":22162,"journal":{"name":"Systematic Reviews","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-024-02595-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) is a common chronic inflammatory oral disease that negatively impacts the quality of life. Current therapies aim to reduce pain and healing process yet challenges such as rapid loss due to salivary flushing in topical drugs and adverse effects due to prolonged use of systemic medications require further notice. Low-level laser therapy is reported with immediate pain relief and faster healing thus preserving the potential for optimal treatment modalities. This review critically analyses and summarizes the effectiveness of LLLT in reducing pain scores and healing time of RAS. A systematic search was conducted in ScienceDirect, PubMed, and Scopus using keywords of low-level laser therapy, photo-biomodulation therapy, and recurrent aphthous stomatitis. RCTs between 1967 to June 2022, presenting characteristics of the laser and reporting pain score and/or healing time of RAS after irradiation were included. Animal studies and recurrent aphthous ulcers with a history of systemic conditions were excluded. Studies were critically appraised using the RoB 2 tool. A meta-analysis was performed using inverse variance random effects. Fourteen trials with a total of 664 patients were included. Reduced pain was reported in 13 studies, while shortened healing time was presented in 4. The pooling of two studies after CO2 irradiation demonstrated faster healing time compared to placebo (MD − 3.72; 95% CI − 4.18, − 3.25). Pain score and healing time of RAS were reduced after irradiation with LLLT. RoB resulted in “some concerns” urging well-designed RCTs with larger samples to further assess each laser application for comparison. PROSPERO CRD42022355737.
系统综述和荟萃分析:低强度激光疗法对减少复发性口腔炎疼痛评分和愈合时间的效果
复发性口腔炎(RAS)是一种常见的慢性口腔炎症,对患者的生活质量造成负面影响。目前的疗法旨在减轻疼痛和促进愈合,但需要进一步注意的挑战包括:外用药物的唾液冲洗导致快速流失,以及长期使用全身性药物导致的不良反应。据报道,低强度激光疗法可立即缓解疼痛并加快愈合,从而保留了最佳治疗方式的潜力。本综述批判性地分析和总结了低强度激光疗法在减少疼痛评分和缩短 RAS 愈合时间方面的有效性。我们使用低强度激光疗法、光生物调节疗法和复发性口腔炎等关键词在 ScienceDirect、PubMed 和 Scopus 上进行了系统检索。研究纳入了 1967 年至 2022 年 6 月间的 RCT,这些研究介绍了激光的特点,并报告了照射后 RAS 的疼痛评分和/或愈合时间。动物研究和有全身性疾病史的复发性口腔溃疡除外。研究采用 RoB 2 工具进行严格评估。采用反方差随机效应进行了荟萃分析。共纳入了 14 项试验,共计 664 名患者。13项研究报告了疼痛减轻的情况,4项研究报告了愈合时间缩短的情况。与安慰剂相比,二氧化碳照射后的两项研究显示愈合时间更快(MD - 3.72; 95% CI - 4.18, - 3.25)。使用 LLLT 照射后,RAS 的疼痛评分和愈合时间均有所缩短。RoB导致了 "一些担忧",因此需要进行设计合理、样本更大的RCT研究,进一步评估每种激光应用,以便进行比较。ProCORDO CRD42022355737。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Systematic Reviews
Systematic Reviews Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
241
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Systematic Reviews encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of systematic reviews. The journal publishes high quality systematic review products including systematic review protocols, systematic reviews related to a very broad definition of health, rapid reviews, updates of already completed systematic reviews, and methods research related to the science of systematic reviews, such as decision modelling. At this time Systematic Reviews does not accept reviews of in vitro studies. The journal also aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted systematic reviews are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信