Multilevel perspectives on the implementation of the collaborative care model for depression and anxiety in primary care

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Avram Kordon, Allison J. Carroll, Emily Fu, Lisa J. Rosenthal, Jeffrey T. Rado, Neil Jordan, C. Hendricks Brown, Justin D. Smith
{"title":"Multilevel perspectives on the implementation of the collaborative care model for depression and anxiety in primary care","authors":"Avram Kordon, Allison J. Carroll, Emily Fu, Lisa J. Rosenthal, Jeffrey T. Rado, Neil Jordan, C. Hendricks Brown, Justin D. Smith","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-05930-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is an evidence-based mental health treatment in primary care. A greater understanding of the determinants of successful CoCM implementation, particularly the characteristics of multi-level implementers, is needed. This study was a process evaluation of the Collaborative Behavioral Health Program (CBHP) study (NCT04321876) in which CoCM was implemented in 11 primary care practices. CBHP implementation included screening for depression and anxiety, referral to CBHP, and treatment with behavioral care managers (BCMs). Interviews were conducted 4- and 15-months post-implementation with BCMs, practice managers, and practice champions (primary care clinicians). We used framework-guided rapid qualitative analysis with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Version 2.0, focused on the Individuals domain, to analyze response data. These data represented the roles of Mid-Level Leaders (practice managers), Implementation Team Members (clinicians, support staff), Innovation Deliverers (BCMs), and Innovation Recipients (primary care/CBHP patients) and their characteristics (i.e., Need, Capability, Opportunity, Motivation). Mid-level leaders (practice managers) were enthusiastic about CBHP (Motivation), appreciated integrating mental health services into primary care (Need), and had time to assist clinicians (Opportunity). Although CBHP lessened the burden for implementation team members (clinicians, staff; Need), some were hesitant to reallocate patient care (Motivation). Innovation deliverers (BCMs) were eager to deliver CBHP (Motivation) and confident in assisting patients (Capability); their opportunity to deliver CBHP could be limited by clinician referrals (Opportunity). Although CBHP alleviated barriers for innovation recipients (patients; Need), it was difficult to secure services for those with severe conditions (Capability) and certain insurance types (Opportunity). Overall, respondents favored sustaining CoCM and highlighted the positive impacts on the practice, health care team, and patients. Participants emphasized the benefits of integrating mental health services into primary care and how CBHP lessened the burden on clinicians while providing patients with comprehensive care. Barriers to CBHP implementation included ensuring appropriate patient referrals, providing treatment for patients with higher-level needs, and incentivizing clinician engagement. Future CoCM implementation should include strategies focused on education and training, encouraging clinician buy-in, and preparing referral paths for patients with more severe conditions or diverse needs. ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04321876). Registered: March 25,2020. Retrospectively registered.","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05930-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) is an evidence-based mental health treatment in primary care. A greater understanding of the determinants of successful CoCM implementation, particularly the characteristics of multi-level implementers, is needed. This study was a process evaluation of the Collaborative Behavioral Health Program (CBHP) study (NCT04321876) in which CoCM was implemented in 11 primary care practices. CBHP implementation included screening for depression and anxiety, referral to CBHP, and treatment with behavioral care managers (BCMs). Interviews were conducted 4- and 15-months post-implementation with BCMs, practice managers, and practice champions (primary care clinicians). We used framework-guided rapid qualitative analysis with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, Version 2.0, focused on the Individuals domain, to analyze response data. These data represented the roles of Mid-Level Leaders (practice managers), Implementation Team Members (clinicians, support staff), Innovation Deliverers (BCMs), and Innovation Recipients (primary care/CBHP patients) and their characteristics (i.e., Need, Capability, Opportunity, Motivation). Mid-level leaders (practice managers) were enthusiastic about CBHP (Motivation), appreciated integrating mental health services into primary care (Need), and had time to assist clinicians (Opportunity). Although CBHP lessened the burden for implementation team members (clinicians, staff; Need), some were hesitant to reallocate patient care (Motivation). Innovation deliverers (BCMs) were eager to deliver CBHP (Motivation) and confident in assisting patients (Capability); their opportunity to deliver CBHP could be limited by clinician referrals (Opportunity). Although CBHP alleviated barriers for innovation recipients (patients; Need), it was difficult to secure services for those with severe conditions (Capability) and certain insurance types (Opportunity). Overall, respondents favored sustaining CoCM and highlighted the positive impacts on the practice, health care team, and patients. Participants emphasized the benefits of integrating mental health services into primary care and how CBHP lessened the burden on clinicians while providing patients with comprehensive care. Barriers to CBHP implementation included ensuring appropriate patient referrals, providing treatment for patients with higher-level needs, and incentivizing clinician engagement. Future CoCM implementation should include strategies focused on education and training, encouraging clinician buy-in, and preparing referral paths for patients with more severe conditions or diverse needs. ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04321876). Registered: March 25,2020. Retrospectively registered.
从多层面视角探讨在初级保健中实施抑郁和焦虑症协作护理模式的问题
协作护理模式(CoCM)是一种以证据为基础的初级保健心理健康治疗方法。我们需要进一步了解成功实施 CoCM 的决定因素,尤其是多层次实施者的特征。本研究是对行为健康合作计划(CBHP)研究(NCT04321876)的过程评估,在该研究中,11 家初级保健机构实施了 CoCM。CBHP 的实施包括抑郁和焦虑筛查、转诊至 CBHP 以及接受行为护理经理 (BCM) 的治疗。我们在实施后 4 个月和 15 个月分别对 BCMs、实践经理和实践倡导者(初级保健临床医生)进行了访谈。我们使用实施研究综合框架 2.0 版框架指导下的快速定性分析来分析回复数据,重点关注个人领域。这些数据代表了中层领导(业务经理)、实施团队成员(临床医生、支持人员)、创新实施者(BCMs)和创新接受者(初级保健/CBHP 患者)的角色及其特征(即需求、能力、机会、动机)。中层领导(业务经理)对 CBHP 充满热情(动机),赞赏将心理健康服务整合到初级保健中(需求),并且有时间协助临床医生(机会)。虽然 CBHP 减轻了实施团队成员(临床医生、员工;需要)的负担,但有些人对重新分配病人的 护理工作犹豫不决(动机)。创新实施者(BCMs)渴望实施 CBHP(动机),并对帮助患者充满信心(能力);他们实施 CBHP 的机会可能会受到临床医生转诊的限制(机会)。虽然 CBHP 为创新受惠者(患者;需求)减少了障碍,但对于那些病情严重的患者(能力)和某些保险类型的患者(机会)来说,很难获得服务。总体而言,受访者赞成维持 CoCM,并强调了其对实践、医疗团队和患者的积极影响。受访者强调了将心理健康服务纳入初级医疗保健的好处,以及 CBHP 如何在为患者提供全面医疗保健的同时减轻临床医生的负担。实施 CBHP 的障碍包括确保适当的患者转诊、为有更高层次需求的患者提供治疗以及激励临床医生的参与。未来 CoCM 的实施应包括以教育和培训为重点的策略,鼓励临床医生参与,并为病情较重或有不同需求的患者准备转诊途径。ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04321876).已注册:2020年3月25日。回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信