Integrating cover crops and organic amendments to mitigate the limitations of tillage on soil health and cotton productivity

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Godfred Ankomah, Solomon Amissah, Stephanie Hollifield, Mussie Y. Habteselassie, Dorcas H. Franklin, John L. Snider, Robert C. Kemerait, Philip M. Roberts, Henry Y. Sintim
{"title":"Integrating cover crops and organic amendments to mitigate the limitations of tillage on soil health and cotton productivity","authors":"Godfred Ankomah,&nbsp;Solomon Amissah,&nbsp;Stephanie Hollifield,&nbsp;Mussie Y. Habteselassie,&nbsp;Dorcas H. Franklin,&nbsp;John L. Snider,&nbsp;Robert C. Kemerait,&nbsp;Philip M. Roberts,&nbsp;Henry Y. Sintim","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Various tillage systems have limitations on soil health, such as the degradation of soil structure and organic matter under conventional tillage (CT) systems, as well as short-term soil compaction in conservation tillage systems. A 3-year field experiment was established to evaluate the integration of cover crop (CC) and organic amendments (OAs) into CT and strip tillage (ST) systems, and their impact on soil properties and cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) productivity. The CC was cereal rye (<i>Secale cereale</i>), and the combined application of animal manure and biochar constituted the OA. In the third year, differences in soil compaction between the CT and ST systems were observed when the measurements were made after tillage. Moreover, integrating CC and OA under the CT and ST systems increased the soil depth to compaction zones. Soil compaction was observed at 27.5-cm depth under CT, at 30-cm depth under CT integrated with CC and OA, at 10-cm depth under ST, and at 15-cm depth under ST integrated with CC and OA, using 2 MPa as the threshold. In general, the integration of CC and OA tended to increase soil respiration, organic matter, and available nutrients, but the effects were not consistent across years and soil depth. Despite differences in the various soil health properties, the management systems had minimum impact on cotton productivity and fiber quality, indicating the ST was effective in preparing the seedbed. Moreover, the differences in soil properties were not at yield-limiting levels within 3 years of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2615-2629"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21649","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21649","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various tillage systems have limitations on soil health, such as the degradation of soil structure and organic matter under conventional tillage (CT) systems, as well as short-term soil compaction in conservation tillage systems. A 3-year field experiment was established to evaluate the integration of cover crop (CC) and organic amendments (OAs) into CT and strip tillage (ST) systems, and their impact on soil properties and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity. The CC was cereal rye (Secale cereale), and the combined application of animal manure and biochar constituted the OA. In the third year, differences in soil compaction between the CT and ST systems were observed when the measurements were made after tillage. Moreover, integrating CC and OA under the CT and ST systems increased the soil depth to compaction zones. Soil compaction was observed at 27.5-cm depth under CT, at 30-cm depth under CT integrated with CC and OA, at 10-cm depth under ST, and at 15-cm depth under ST integrated with CC and OA, using 2 MPa as the threshold. In general, the integration of CC and OA tended to increase soil respiration, organic matter, and available nutrients, but the effects were not consistent across years and soil depth. Despite differences in the various soil health properties, the management systems had minimum impact on cotton productivity and fiber quality, indicating the ST was effective in preparing the seedbed. Moreover, the differences in soil properties were not at yield-limiting levels within 3 years of the study.

Abstract Image

整合覆盖作物和有机添加剂,减轻耕作对土壤健康和棉花产量的限制
各种耕作制度对土壤健康都有限制,例如常规耕作(CT)制度下土壤结构和有机质的退化,以及保护性耕作制度下土壤的短期板结。为了评估覆盖作物(CC)和有机添加剂(OAs)与常规耕作和条状耕作(ST)系统的结合及其对土壤特性和棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)产量的影响,我们进行了一项为期 3 年的田间试验。CC为黑麦(Secale cereale),OA为动物粪便和生物炭的联合应用。第三年,在耕作后进行测量时,观察到 CT 和 ST 系统的土壤紧实度存在差异。此外,在 CT 和 ST 系统下综合使用 CC 和 OA 增加了压实区的土壤深度。以 2 兆帕为临界值,在 CT 系统下,土壤压实深度为 27.5 厘米;在综合了 CC 和 OA 的 CT 系统下,土壤压实深度为 30 厘米;在 ST 系统下,土壤压实深度为 10 厘米;在综合了 CC 和 OA 的 ST 系统下,土壤压实深度为 15 厘米。一般来说,CC 和 OA 的整合往往会提高土壤呼吸作用、有机质和可用养分,但不同年份和不同土壤深度的效果并不一致。尽管各种土壤健康属性存在差异,但管理系统对棉花生产率和纤维质量的影响最小,这表明 ST 在准备苗床方面是有效的。此外,在研究的 3 年内,土壤特性的差异并未达到限制产量的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信