Kernel number and kernel weight stability can vary across corn hybrids

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Jinwook Kim, Paul Sullivan, Lindsey Caldwell, Julia Downey, David C. Hooker, Joshua Nasielski
{"title":"Kernel number and kernel weight stability can vary across corn hybrids","authors":"Jinwook Kim,&nbsp;Paul Sullivan,&nbsp;Lindsey Caldwell,&nbsp;Julia Downey,&nbsp;David C. Hooker,&nbsp;Joshua Nasielski","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The stability of a trait refers to the extent to which its expression in a given genotype varies across environments. The more stable a trait, the less variable its expression. Grain yield stability is a central consideration in corn production to ensure that hybrids perform consistently across environments and is frequently quantified given its importance. Little attention has been paid to the stability of corn yield components, kernel number per m<sup>2</sup> (KN), and kernel weight (KW). Our hypothesis is that while previous research suggests that yield stability of commercial corn hybrids is generally consistent, the stabilities of KN and KW may exhibit significant differences, even when overall yield stability remains constant. This study evaluated the yield and yield component stabilities of 23 commercial corn hybrids conducted on-farm at five location-years in Ontario, Canada, using Finlay–Wilkinson regression. Most (61%) hybrids exhibited average yield stability with <i>β</i><sub>1</sub>-values close to 1.0. But seven hybrids displaying average yield stability had KN and/or KW stabilities significantly different than average. While in absolute terms, KW was always more stable than KN across environments, the data indicate that hybrids have different mechanisms to achieve stable yields in terms of relative yield component adjustments. Overall, 14 hybrids had yield component <i>β</i><sub>1</sub>-values significantly more or less stable than average. The instances where yield component <i>β</i><sub>1</sub>-values differed significantly from 1.0 were almost equally divided between KN and KW. These findings support the potential for hybrid-specific corn management, that is, tailoring management practices to take advantage of hybrid variation in yield component stabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2446-2457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21640","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21640","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The stability of a trait refers to the extent to which its expression in a given genotype varies across environments. The more stable a trait, the less variable its expression. Grain yield stability is a central consideration in corn production to ensure that hybrids perform consistently across environments and is frequently quantified given its importance. Little attention has been paid to the stability of corn yield components, kernel number per m2 (KN), and kernel weight (KW). Our hypothesis is that while previous research suggests that yield stability of commercial corn hybrids is generally consistent, the stabilities of KN and KW may exhibit significant differences, even when overall yield stability remains constant. This study evaluated the yield and yield component stabilities of 23 commercial corn hybrids conducted on-farm at five location-years in Ontario, Canada, using Finlay–Wilkinson regression. Most (61%) hybrids exhibited average yield stability with β1-values close to 1.0. But seven hybrids displaying average yield stability had KN and/or KW stabilities significantly different than average. While in absolute terms, KW was always more stable than KN across environments, the data indicate that hybrids have different mechanisms to achieve stable yields in terms of relative yield component adjustments. Overall, 14 hybrids had yield component β1-values significantly more or less stable than average. The instances where yield component β1-values differed significantly from 1.0 were almost equally divided between KN and KW. These findings support the potential for hybrid-specific corn management, that is, tailoring management practices to take advantage of hybrid variation in yield component stabilities.

Abstract Image

不同玉米杂交种的籽粒数和籽粒重量稳定性可能不同
性状的稳定性是指性状在特定基因型中的表达在不同环境下的变化程度。性状越稳定,其表达的变化就越小。谷物产量稳定性是玉米生产中的一个核心考虑因素,可确保杂交种在不同环境中表现一致,鉴于其重要性,经常对其进行量化。人们很少关注玉米产量成分、每平方米籽粒数(KN)和籽粒重量(KW)的稳定性。我们的假设是,虽然之前的研究表明,商业玉米杂交种的产量稳定性基本一致,但 KN 和 KW 的稳定性可能会表现出显著差异,即使整体产量稳定性保持不变。这项研究使用芬莱-威尔金森回归法评估了加拿大安大略省五个地点-年的 23 个商业玉米杂交种的产量和产量成分稳定性。大多数杂交种(61%)表现出平均产量稳定性,β1 值接近 1.0。但有 7 个表现出平均产量稳定性的杂交种的 KN 和/或 KW 稳定性与平均值相差很大。虽然从绝对值来看,不同环境下 KW 的稳定性总是高于 KN,但数据表明,杂交种在相对产量成分调整方面有不同的机制来实现稳定的产量。总体而言,14 个杂交种的产量成分 β1 值明显比平均值更稳定或更不稳定。产量成分 β1 值与 1.0 显著不同的情况在 KN 和 KW 之间几乎各占一半。这些发现支持了针对杂交种的玉米管理潜力,即利用杂交种在产量成分稳定性方面的差异来调整管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信