Geologic Constraints on the Formation and Evolution of Saturn's Mid-Sized Moons.

IF 9.1 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Space Science Reviews Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s11214-024-01084-z
Alyssa Rose Rhoden, Sierra N Ferguson, William Bottke, Julie C Castillo-Rogez, Emily Martin, Michael Bland, Michelle Kirchoff, Marco Zannoni, Nicolas Rambaux, Julien Salmon
{"title":"Geologic Constraints on the Formation and Evolution of Saturn's Mid-Sized Moons.","authors":"Alyssa Rose Rhoden, Sierra N Ferguson, William Bottke, Julie C Castillo-Rogez, Emily Martin, Michael Bland, Michelle Kirchoff, Marco Zannoni, Nicolas Rambaux, Julien Salmon","doi":"10.1007/s11214-024-01084-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Saturn's mid-sized icy moons have complex relationships with Saturn's interior, the rings, and with each other, which can be expressed in their shapes, interiors, and geology. Observations of their physical states can, thus, provide important constraints on the ages and formation mechanism(s) of the moons, which in turn informs our understanding of the formation and evolution of Saturn and its rings. Here, we describe the cratering records of the mid-sized moons and the value and limitations of their use for constraining the histories of the moons. We also discuss observational constraints on the interior structures of the moons and geologically-derived inferences on their thermal budgets through time. Overall, the geologic records of the moons (with the exception of Mimas) include evidence of epochs of high heat flows, short- and long-lived subsurface oceans, extensional tectonics, and considerable cratering. Curiously, Mimas presents no clear evidence of an ocean within its surface geology, but its rotation and orbit indicate a present-day ocean. While the moons need not be primordial to produce the observed levels of interior evolution and geologic activity, there is likely a minimum age associated with their development that has yet to be determined. Uncertainties in the populations impacting the moons makes it challenging to further constrain their formation timeframes using craters, whereas the characteristics of their cores and other geologic inferences of their thermal evolutions may help narrow down their potential histories. Disruptive collisions may have also played an important role in the formation and evolution of Saturn's mid-sized moons, and even the rings of Saturn, although more sophisticated modeling is needed to determine the collision conditions that produce rings and moons that fit the observational constraints. Overall, the existence and physical characteristics of Saturn's mid-sized moons provide critical benchmarks for the development of formation theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":21902,"journal":{"name":"Space Science Reviews","volume":"220 5","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255024/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space Science Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-024-01084-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Saturn's mid-sized icy moons have complex relationships with Saturn's interior, the rings, and with each other, which can be expressed in their shapes, interiors, and geology. Observations of their physical states can, thus, provide important constraints on the ages and formation mechanism(s) of the moons, which in turn informs our understanding of the formation and evolution of Saturn and its rings. Here, we describe the cratering records of the mid-sized moons and the value and limitations of their use for constraining the histories of the moons. We also discuss observational constraints on the interior structures of the moons and geologically-derived inferences on their thermal budgets through time. Overall, the geologic records of the moons (with the exception of Mimas) include evidence of epochs of high heat flows, short- and long-lived subsurface oceans, extensional tectonics, and considerable cratering. Curiously, Mimas presents no clear evidence of an ocean within its surface geology, but its rotation and orbit indicate a present-day ocean. While the moons need not be primordial to produce the observed levels of interior evolution and geologic activity, there is likely a minimum age associated with their development that has yet to be determined. Uncertainties in the populations impacting the moons makes it challenging to further constrain their formation timeframes using craters, whereas the characteristics of their cores and other geologic inferences of their thermal evolutions may help narrow down their potential histories. Disruptive collisions may have also played an important role in the formation and evolution of Saturn's mid-sized moons, and even the rings of Saturn, although more sophisticated modeling is needed to determine the collision conditions that produce rings and moons that fit the observational constraints. Overall, the existence and physical characteristics of Saturn's mid-sized moons provide critical benchmarks for the development of formation theories.

土星中型卫星形成和演化的地质制约因素。
土星的中型冰卫星与土星内部、土星环以及它们之间有着复杂的关系,这种关系可以通过它们的形状、内部结构和地质学表现出来。因此,对其物理状态的观测可以为卫星的年龄和形成机制提供重要的制约因素,进而帮助我们了解土星及其星环的形成和演变过程。在此,我们将介绍中型卫星的陨石坑记录,以及这些记录在制约卫星历史方面的价值和局限性。我们还讨论了对这些卫星内部结构的观测约束,以及从地质学角度推断出的这些卫星在不同时期的热预算。总体而言,这些卫星(除米马斯卫星外)的地质记录包括高热流时代、短期和长期的地表下海洋、伸展构造和大量陨石坑的证据。奇怪的是,米马斯的表面地质中没有海洋的明显证据,但它的自转和轨道却表明有现今的海洋。虽然这些卫星不一定是原始的,就能产生观测到的内部演化和地质活动水平,但它们的发展可能有一个最低年龄,这个年龄还有待确定。由于撞击卫星的种群存在不确定性,因此利用陨石坑来进一步确定它们的形成时间具有挑战性,而卫星内核的特征以及对其热演化的其他地质推断可能有助于缩小其潜在历史的范围。破坏性碰撞也可能在土星中型卫星甚至土星环的形成和演化过程中发挥了重要作用,不过还需要更复杂的建模来确定产生符合观测约束条件的土星环和卫星的碰撞条件。总之,土星中型卫星的存在和物理特征为形成理论的发展提供了关键基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Space Science Reviews
Space Science Reviews 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
19.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
60
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Space Science Reviews (SSRv) stands as an international journal dedicated to scientific space research, offering a contemporary synthesis across various branches of space exploration. Emphasizing scientific outcomes and instruments, SSRv spans astrophysics, physics of planetary systems, solar physics, and the physics of magnetospheres & interplanetary matter. Beyond Topical Collections and invited Review Articles, Space Science Reviews welcomes unsolicited Review Articles and Special Communications. The latter encompass papers related to a prior topical volume/collection, report-type papers, or timely contributions addressing a robust combination of space science and technology. These papers succinctly summarize both the science and technology aspects of instruments or missions in a single publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信