Causal relationships between COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism: A mendelian randomization analysis.

Hui Wang, Sensen Wu, Dikang Pan, Wenzhuo Meng, Lefan Hu, Hanyu Zhang, Yachan Ning, Jianming Guo, Yongquan Gu
{"title":"Causal relationships between COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism: A mendelian randomization analysis.","authors":"Hui Wang, Sensen Wu, Dikang Pan, Wenzhuo Meng, Lefan Hu, Hanyu Zhang, Yachan Ning, Jianming Guo, Yongquan Gu","doi":"10.1177/02683555241266659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Observational studies show the correlation between COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. However, the causal effects remain uncertain. We aimed to explore the potential causal association between COVID-19 and VTE using Mendelian randomization (MR) design. <b>Methods:</b> Two-sample MR was used to evaluate the potential causality between COVID-19 and VTE by selecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables (IVs) from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode were employed as supplementary methods for MR estimations, with the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method serving as the principal analysis. In addition, we took sensitivity analyses, including Cochran's test, MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO), and leave-one-out analysis to ensure that we obtained stable and reliable results. <b>Results:</b> Our study selected 26 COVID-19 severity, 31 COVID-19 hospitalization, and 13 COVID-19 susceptibility SNPs as instrumental variables. The IVW analysis results revealed that there was no causal relationship between COVID-19 severity, hospitalization, or susceptibility and VTE, with odds ratios of 0.974 (95%CI: 0.936-1.013, <i>p</i> = 0.19), 0.976 (95%CI: 0.918-1.039, <i>p</i> = 0.447), and 0.908 (95%CI: 0.775-1.065, <i>p</i> = 0.235), respectively. The IVW approach yielded consistent results with MR-Egger, Weighted Median simple mode, and weighted mode. MR-PRESSO and sensitivity analysis further confirmed the stability and consistency of the MR results. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study did not find evidence to support a causal relationship between COVID-19 and VTE at the genetic level. Further investigation is warranted to determine if the significant association reported in previous observational studies between the two is due to confounding factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555241266659"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241266659","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Observational studies show the correlation between COVID-19 and venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk. However, the causal effects remain uncertain. We aimed to explore the potential causal association between COVID-19 and VTE using Mendelian randomization (MR) design. Methods: Two-sample MR was used to evaluate the potential causality between COVID-19 and VTE by selecting single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables (IVs) from genome-wide association studies (GWAS). The weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, and weighted mode were employed as supplementary methods for MR estimations, with the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method serving as the principal analysis. In addition, we took sensitivity analyses, including Cochran's test, MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier (MR-PRESSO), and leave-one-out analysis to ensure that we obtained stable and reliable results. Results: Our study selected 26 COVID-19 severity, 31 COVID-19 hospitalization, and 13 COVID-19 susceptibility SNPs as instrumental variables. The IVW analysis results revealed that there was no causal relationship between COVID-19 severity, hospitalization, or susceptibility and VTE, with odds ratios of 0.974 (95%CI: 0.936-1.013, p = 0.19), 0.976 (95%CI: 0.918-1.039, p = 0.447), and 0.908 (95%CI: 0.775-1.065, p = 0.235), respectively. The IVW approach yielded consistent results with MR-Egger, Weighted Median simple mode, and weighted mode. MR-PRESSO and sensitivity analysis further confirmed the stability and consistency of the MR results. Conclusions: This study did not find evidence to support a causal relationship between COVID-19 and VTE at the genetic level. Further investigation is warranted to determine if the significant association reported in previous observational studies between the two is due to confounding factors.

COVID-19 与静脉血栓栓塞之间的因果关系:孟德尔随机分析
目的:观察性研究表明,COVID-19 与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)风险之间存在相关性。然而,其因果关系仍不确定。我们旨在采用孟德尔随机化(MR)设计探讨 COVID-19 与 VTE 之间的潜在因果关系。方法:通过从全基因组关联研究(GWAS)中选择单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)作为工具变量(IVs),使用双样本 MR 评估 COVID-19 与 VTE 之间的潜在因果关系。我们采用了加权中位数法、MR-Egger 法、简单模式法和加权模式法作为 MR 估计的辅助方法,并将逆方差加权法(IVW)作为主要分析方法。此外,我们还进行了敏感性分析,包括 Cochran 检验、MR-Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier(MR-PRESSO)和leave-one-out 分析,以确保获得稳定可靠的结果。研究结果我们的研究选择了 26 个 COVID-19 严重性、31 个 COVID-19 住院治疗和 13 个 COVID-19 易感性 SNP 作为工具变量。IVW 分析结果显示,COVID-19 严重程度、住院治疗或易感性与 VTE 之间没有因果关系,几率比分别为 0.974(95%CI:0.936-1.013,p = 0.19)、0.976(95%CI:0.918-1.039,p = 0.447)和 0.908(95%CI:0.775-1.065,p = 0.235)。IVW 方法与 MR-Egger、加权中位数简单模式和加权模式的结果一致。MR-PRESSO 和敏感性分析进一步证实了 MR 结果的稳定性和一致性。结论:本研究没有发现证据支持 COVID-19 与 VTE 在基因水平上的因果关系。需要进一步调查,以确定之前的观察性研究中报告的两者之间的显著关联是否是由于混杂因素造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信