Complete ureteropelvic-junction disruption following renal trauma: conservative management.

M B Oliver Vall-Llosera, R Gander, G Royo Gomes, M Aguilera Pujabet, O Rocha Guzmán, M López Paredes, M Asensio Lorente
{"title":"Complete ureteropelvic-junction disruption following renal trauma: conservative management.","authors":"M B Oliver Vall-Llosera, R Gander, G Royo Gomes, M Aguilera Pujabet, O Rocha Guzmán, M López Paredes, M Asensio Lorente","doi":"10.54847/cp.2024.03.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical exploration in complete ureteropelvic-junction disruption (CUPJD) is still recommended by many authors. Conservative approach to pediatric renal trauma (RT) includes minimally invasive techniques such as nephrostomy, angioembolization or double-J stent placement.</p><p><strong>Case report: </strong>A 14-year-old patient with CUPJD was treated conservatively. CT-scan revealed active bleeding of the renal artery and significant urine extravasation. Coil angioembolization and nephrostomy placement were performed. An attempt to place a double-J stent was unsuccessful and surgical reconstruction was scheduled. Before surgery, methylene-blue was injected through the nephrostomy observing blue urine output through urethra. Antegrade pyelogram revealed drainage from the urinoma to the ureter. A new attempt to place an internal-external double-J-stent was successful. After 5 weeks, it was removed with total restoration of the urinary tract.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Complete urinary tract restoration in some cases of CUPJD following RT is possible through a nonoperative approach. It can be safe and effective, reducing the risk of complications associated with complex surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":94306,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","volume":"37 3","pages":"141-144"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2024.03.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical exploration in complete ureteropelvic-junction disruption (CUPJD) is still recommended by many authors. Conservative approach to pediatric renal trauma (RT) includes minimally invasive techniques such as nephrostomy, angioembolization or double-J stent placement.

Case report: A 14-year-old patient with CUPJD was treated conservatively. CT-scan revealed active bleeding of the renal artery and significant urine extravasation. Coil angioembolization and nephrostomy placement were performed. An attempt to place a double-J stent was unsuccessful and surgical reconstruction was scheduled. Before surgery, methylene-blue was injected through the nephrostomy observing blue urine output through urethra. Antegrade pyelogram revealed drainage from the urinoma to the ureter. A new attempt to place an internal-external double-J-stent was successful. After 5 weeks, it was removed with total restoration of the urinary tract.

Conclusion: Complete urinary tract restoration in some cases of CUPJD following RT is possible through a nonoperative approach. It can be safe and effective, reducing the risk of complications associated with complex surgeries.

肾外伤后输尿管肾盂连接处完全断裂:保守治疗。
简介:许多学者仍建议对完全性输尿管肾盂连接中断(CUPJD)进行手术探查。小儿肾创伤(RT)的保守治疗方法包括肾造瘘术、血管栓塞术或双J支架置入术等微创技术:病例报告:一名 14 岁的 CUPJD 患者接受了保守治疗。CT 扫描显示肾动脉有活动性出血和明显的尿液外渗。患者接受了盘状血管栓塞术和肾造瘘术。尝试放置双J支架未果,于是安排了手术重建。手术前,通过肾造口术注入亚甲基蓝,观察到蓝色尿液通过尿道排出。前行肾盂造影显示尿瘤向输尿管引流。再次尝试放置内外双 J 型支架获得成功。5 周后,支架被移除,尿路完全恢复:结论:通过非手术方法,可以使一些接受 RT 治疗的 CUPJD 病例的尿路完全恢复。结论:对于某些接受 RT 治疗的 CUPJD 病例,可以通过非手术方法完全恢复尿路功能,这种方法既安全又有效,还能降低复杂手术带来的并发症风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信